Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of Irritable Bo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23095351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-149 |
_version_ | 1782260145845174272 |
---|---|
author | Stamuli, Eugena Bloor, Karen MacPherson, Hugh Tilbrook, Helen Stuardi, Tracy Brabyn, Sally Torgerson, David |
author_facet | Stamuli, Eugena Bloor, Karen MacPherson, Hugh Tilbrook, Helen Stuardi, Tracy Brabyn, Sally Torgerson, David |
author_sort | Stamuli, Eugena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). METHODS: Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. 233 patients with irritable bowel syndrome were randomly allocated to either acupuncture plus usual care, or usual care alone. Cost-effectiveness outcomes are expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) at one year after randomisation. Costs were estimated from the UK National Health Service perspective for a time horizon of one year. Cost-utility ratios were estimated based on complete case analysis for the base case analysis, where only patients with available EQ-5D and cost data were included. Sensitivity analyses comprised a multiple imputation approach for missing data and a subgroup analysis for the more severe cases of IBS. RESULTS: The base case analysis showed acupuncture to be marginally more effective than usual care (gain of 0.0035 QALYs, 95% CI: -0.00395 to 0.0465) and more expensive (incremental cost of £218 per patient (95% CI: 55.87 to 492.87) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £62,500. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data resulted in acupuncture appearing less effective and more costly than usual care, so usual care is dominant. Subgroup analysis selecting the most severe cases of IBS (Symptom Severity Score of over 300) suggested that acupuncture may be a cost-effective treatment option for this group, with a cost-per-QALY of £6,500. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care is not a cost-effective option for the whole IBS population; however it may be cost-effective for those with more severe irritable bowel syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN08827905 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3579701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35797012013-02-23 Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care Stamuli, Eugena Bloor, Karen MacPherson, Hugh Tilbrook, Helen Stuardi, Tracy Brabyn, Sally Torgerson, David BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). METHODS: Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. 233 patients with irritable bowel syndrome were randomly allocated to either acupuncture plus usual care, or usual care alone. Cost-effectiveness outcomes are expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) at one year after randomisation. Costs were estimated from the UK National Health Service perspective for a time horizon of one year. Cost-utility ratios were estimated based on complete case analysis for the base case analysis, where only patients with available EQ-5D and cost data were included. Sensitivity analyses comprised a multiple imputation approach for missing data and a subgroup analysis for the more severe cases of IBS. RESULTS: The base case analysis showed acupuncture to be marginally more effective than usual care (gain of 0.0035 QALYs, 95% CI: -0.00395 to 0.0465) and more expensive (incremental cost of £218 per patient (95% CI: 55.87 to 492.87) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £62,500. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data resulted in acupuncture appearing less effective and more costly than usual care, so usual care is dominant. Subgroup analysis selecting the most severe cases of IBS (Symptom Severity Score of over 300) suggested that acupuncture may be a cost-effective treatment option for this group, with a cost-per-QALY of £6,500. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care is not a cost-effective option for the whole IBS population; however it may be cost-effective for those with more severe irritable bowel syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN08827905 BioMed Central 2012-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3579701/ /pubmed/23095351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-149 Text en Copyright ©2012 Stamuli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stamuli, Eugena Bloor, Karen MacPherson, Hugh Tilbrook, Helen Stuardi, Tracy Brabyn, Sally Torgerson, David Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care |
title | Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23095351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stamulieugena costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare AT bloorkaren costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare AT macphersonhugh costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare AT tilbrookhelen costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare AT stuarditracy costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare AT brabynsally costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare AT torgersondavid costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare |