Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of Irritable Bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stamuli, Eugena, Bloor, Karen, MacPherson, Hugh, Tilbrook, Helen, Stuardi, Tracy, Brabyn, Sally, Torgerson, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23095351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-149
_version_ 1782260145845174272
author Stamuli, Eugena
Bloor, Karen
MacPherson, Hugh
Tilbrook, Helen
Stuardi, Tracy
Brabyn, Sally
Torgerson, David
author_facet Stamuli, Eugena
Bloor, Karen
MacPherson, Hugh
Tilbrook, Helen
Stuardi, Tracy
Brabyn, Sally
Torgerson, David
author_sort Stamuli, Eugena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). METHODS: Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. 233 patients with irritable bowel syndrome were randomly allocated to either acupuncture plus usual care, or usual care alone. Cost-effectiveness outcomes are expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) at one year after randomisation. Costs were estimated from the UK National Health Service perspective for a time horizon of one year. Cost-utility ratios were estimated based on complete case analysis for the base case analysis, where only patients with available EQ-5D and cost data were included. Sensitivity analyses comprised a multiple imputation approach for missing data and a subgroup analysis for the more severe cases of IBS. RESULTS: The base case analysis showed acupuncture to be marginally more effective than usual care (gain of 0.0035 QALYs, 95% CI: -0.00395 to 0.0465) and more expensive (incremental cost of £218 per patient (95% CI: 55.87 to 492.87) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £62,500. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data resulted in acupuncture appearing less effective and more costly than usual care, so usual care is dominant. Subgroup analysis selecting the most severe cases of IBS (Symptom Severity Score of over 300) suggested that acupuncture may be a cost-effective treatment option for this group, with a cost-per-QALY of £6,500. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care is not a cost-effective option for the whole IBS population; however it may be cost-effective for those with more severe irritable bowel syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN08827905
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3579701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35797012013-02-23 Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care Stamuli, Eugena Bloor, Karen MacPherson, Hugh Tilbrook, Helen Stuardi, Tracy Brabyn, Sally Torgerson, David BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). METHODS: Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. 233 patients with irritable bowel syndrome were randomly allocated to either acupuncture plus usual care, or usual care alone. Cost-effectiveness outcomes are expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) at one year after randomisation. Costs were estimated from the UK National Health Service perspective for a time horizon of one year. Cost-utility ratios were estimated based on complete case analysis for the base case analysis, where only patients with available EQ-5D and cost data were included. Sensitivity analyses comprised a multiple imputation approach for missing data and a subgroup analysis for the more severe cases of IBS. RESULTS: The base case analysis showed acupuncture to be marginally more effective than usual care (gain of 0.0035 QALYs, 95% CI: -0.00395 to 0.0465) and more expensive (incremental cost of £218 per patient (95% CI: 55.87 to 492.87) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £62,500. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data resulted in acupuncture appearing less effective and more costly than usual care, so usual care is dominant. Subgroup analysis selecting the most severe cases of IBS (Symptom Severity Score of over 300) suggested that acupuncture may be a cost-effective treatment option for this group, with a cost-per-QALY of £6,500. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care is not a cost-effective option for the whole IBS population; however it may be cost-effective for those with more severe irritable bowel syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN08827905 BioMed Central 2012-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3579701/ /pubmed/23095351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-149 Text en Copyright ©2012 Stamuli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stamuli, Eugena
Bloor, Karen
MacPherson, Hugh
Tilbrook, Helen
Stuardi, Tracy
Brabyn, Sally
Torgerson, David
Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
title Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
title_full Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
title_short Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
title_sort cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23095351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-149
work_keys_str_mv AT stamulieugena costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare
AT bloorkaren costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare
AT macphersonhugh costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare
AT tilbrookhelen costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare
AT stuarditracy costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare
AT brabynsally costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare
AT torgersondavid costeffectivenessofacupunctureforirritablebowelsyndromefindingsfromaneconomicevaluationconductedalongsideapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimarycare