Cargando…
A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR
BACKGROUND: Genetically manipulated animals like mice or rabbits play an important role in the exploration of human cardiovascular diseases. It is therefore important to identify animal models that closely mimic physiological and pathological human cardiac function. METHODS: In-vivo phase contrast c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-87 |
_version_ | 1782260156611952640 |
---|---|
author | Jung, Bernd Odening, Katja E Dall’Armellina, Erica Föll, Daniela Menza, Marius Markl, Michael Schneider, Jürgen E |
author_facet | Jung, Bernd Odening, Katja E Dall’Armellina, Erica Föll, Daniela Menza, Marius Markl, Michael Schneider, Jürgen E |
author_sort | Jung, Bernd |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genetically manipulated animals like mice or rabbits play an important role in the exploration of human cardiovascular diseases. It is therefore important to identify animal models that closely mimic physiological and pathological human cardiac function. METHODS: In-vivo phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was used to measure regional three-directional left ventricular myocardial motion with high temporal resolution in mice (N=18), rabbits (N=8), and humans (N=20). Radial, long-axis, and rotational myocardial velocities were acquired in left ventricular basal, mid-ventricular, and apical short-axis locations. RESULTS: Regional analysis revealed different patterns of motion: 1) In humans and rabbits, the apex showed slower radial velocities compared to the base. 2) Significant differences within species were seen in the pattern of long-axis motion. Long-axis velocities during systole were fairly homogeneously distributed in mice, whereas humans showed a dominant component in the lateral wall and rabbits in the base. 3) Rotational velocities and twist showed the most distinct patterns in both temporal evolution and relative contribution of base, mid-ventricle and apex, respectively. Interestingly, a marked difference in rotational behavior during early-systole was found in mice, which exhibited clockwise rotation in all slice locations compared to counter-clockwise rotation in rabbits and humans. CONCLUSIONS: Phase contrast CMR revealed subtle, but significantly different regional myocardial motion patterns in mice, rabbits and humans. This finding has to be considered when investigating myocardial motion pattern in small animal models of heart disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3579745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35797452013-03-02 A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR Jung, Bernd Odening, Katja E Dall’Armellina, Erica Föll, Daniela Menza, Marius Markl, Michael Schneider, Jürgen E J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Genetically manipulated animals like mice or rabbits play an important role in the exploration of human cardiovascular diseases. It is therefore important to identify animal models that closely mimic physiological and pathological human cardiac function. METHODS: In-vivo phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was used to measure regional three-directional left ventricular myocardial motion with high temporal resolution in mice (N=18), rabbits (N=8), and humans (N=20). Radial, long-axis, and rotational myocardial velocities were acquired in left ventricular basal, mid-ventricular, and apical short-axis locations. RESULTS: Regional analysis revealed different patterns of motion: 1) In humans and rabbits, the apex showed slower radial velocities compared to the base. 2) Significant differences within species were seen in the pattern of long-axis motion. Long-axis velocities during systole were fairly homogeneously distributed in mice, whereas humans showed a dominant component in the lateral wall and rabbits in the base. 3) Rotational velocities and twist showed the most distinct patterns in both temporal evolution and relative contribution of base, mid-ventricle and apex, respectively. Interestingly, a marked difference in rotational behavior during early-systole was found in mice, which exhibited clockwise rotation in all slice locations compared to counter-clockwise rotation in rabbits and humans. CONCLUSIONS: Phase contrast CMR revealed subtle, but significantly different regional myocardial motion patterns in mice, rabbits and humans. This finding has to be considered when investigating myocardial motion pattern in small animal models of heart disease. BioMed Central 2012-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3579745/ /pubmed/23270566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-87 Text en Copyright ©2012 Jung et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Jung, Bernd Odening, Katja E Dall’Armellina, Erica Föll, Daniela Menza, Marius Markl, Michael Schneider, Jürgen E A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR |
title | A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR |
title_full | A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR |
title_fullStr | A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR |
title_full_unstemmed | A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR |
title_short | A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast cmr |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-87 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jungbernd aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT odeningkatjae aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT dallarmellinaerica aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT folldaniela aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT menzamarius aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT marklmichael aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT schneiderjurgene aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT jungbernd quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT odeningkatjae quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT dallarmellinaerica quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT folldaniela quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT menzamarius quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT marklmichael quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr AT schneiderjurgene quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr |