Cargando…

A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR

BACKGROUND: Genetically manipulated animals like mice or rabbits play an important role in the exploration of human cardiovascular diseases. It is therefore important to identify animal models that closely mimic physiological and pathological human cardiac function. METHODS: In-vivo phase contrast c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Bernd, Odening, Katja E, Dall’Armellina, Erica, Föll, Daniela, Menza, Marius, Markl, Michael, Schneider, Jürgen E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-87
_version_ 1782260156611952640
author Jung, Bernd
Odening, Katja E
Dall’Armellina, Erica
Föll, Daniela
Menza, Marius
Markl, Michael
Schneider, Jürgen E
author_facet Jung, Bernd
Odening, Katja E
Dall’Armellina, Erica
Föll, Daniela
Menza, Marius
Markl, Michael
Schneider, Jürgen E
author_sort Jung, Bernd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetically manipulated animals like mice or rabbits play an important role in the exploration of human cardiovascular diseases. It is therefore important to identify animal models that closely mimic physiological and pathological human cardiac function. METHODS: In-vivo phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was used to measure regional three-directional left ventricular myocardial motion with high temporal resolution in mice (N=18), rabbits (N=8), and humans (N=20). Radial, long-axis, and rotational myocardial velocities were acquired in left ventricular basal, mid-ventricular, and apical short-axis locations. RESULTS: Regional analysis revealed different patterns of motion: 1) In humans and rabbits, the apex showed slower radial velocities compared to the base. 2) Significant differences within species were seen in the pattern of long-axis motion. Long-axis velocities during systole were fairly homogeneously distributed in mice, whereas humans showed a dominant component in the lateral wall and rabbits in the base. 3) Rotational velocities and twist showed the most distinct patterns in both temporal evolution and relative contribution of base, mid-ventricle and apex, respectively. Interestingly, a marked difference in rotational behavior during early-systole was found in mice, which exhibited clockwise rotation in all slice locations compared to counter-clockwise rotation in rabbits and humans. CONCLUSIONS: Phase contrast CMR revealed subtle, but significantly different regional myocardial motion patterns in mice, rabbits and humans. This finding has to be considered when investigating myocardial motion pattern in small animal models of heart disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3579745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35797452013-03-02 A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR Jung, Bernd Odening, Katja E Dall’Armellina, Erica Föll, Daniela Menza, Marius Markl, Michael Schneider, Jürgen E J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Genetically manipulated animals like mice or rabbits play an important role in the exploration of human cardiovascular diseases. It is therefore important to identify animal models that closely mimic physiological and pathological human cardiac function. METHODS: In-vivo phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was used to measure regional three-directional left ventricular myocardial motion with high temporal resolution in mice (N=18), rabbits (N=8), and humans (N=20). Radial, long-axis, and rotational myocardial velocities were acquired in left ventricular basal, mid-ventricular, and apical short-axis locations. RESULTS: Regional analysis revealed different patterns of motion: 1) In humans and rabbits, the apex showed slower radial velocities compared to the base. 2) Significant differences within species were seen in the pattern of long-axis motion. Long-axis velocities during systole were fairly homogeneously distributed in mice, whereas humans showed a dominant component in the lateral wall and rabbits in the base. 3) Rotational velocities and twist showed the most distinct patterns in both temporal evolution and relative contribution of base, mid-ventricle and apex, respectively. Interestingly, a marked difference in rotational behavior during early-systole was found in mice, which exhibited clockwise rotation in all slice locations compared to counter-clockwise rotation in rabbits and humans. CONCLUSIONS: Phase contrast CMR revealed subtle, but significantly different regional myocardial motion patterns in mice, rabbits and humans. This finding has to be considered when investigating myocardial motion pattern in small animal models of heart disease. BioMed Central 2012-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3579745/ /pubmed/23270566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-87 Text en Copyright ©2012 Jung et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jung, Bernd
Odening, Katja E
Dall’Armellina, Erica
Föll, Daniela
Menza, Marius
Markl, Michael
Schneider, Jürgen E
A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR
title A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR
title_full A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR
title_fullStr A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR
title_short A quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast CMR
title_sort quantitative comparison of regional myocardial motion in mice, rabbits and humans using in-vivo phase contrast cmr
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-87
work_keys_str_mv AT jungbernd aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT odeningkatjae aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT dallarmellinaerica aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT folldaniela aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT menzamarius aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT marklmichael aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT schneiderjurgene aquantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT jungbernd quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT odeningkatjae quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT dallarmellinaerica quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT folldaniela quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT menzamarius quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT marklmichael quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr
AT schneiderjurgene quantitativecomparisonofregionalmyocardialmotioninmicerabbitsandhumansusinginvivophasecontrastcmr