Cargando…

Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling

Poly implant prostheses (PIP) implants have raised concern due to the increased reporting of ruptures prompting a UK review in 2012 recommending that symptomatic patients only undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explantation as necessary. Literature suggests two of three implant ruptures ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mylvaganam, Senthurun, Taylor, Rebecca, Thrush, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24964409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjs044
_version_ 1782260170855809024
author Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Taylor, Rebecca
Thrush, Steven
author_facet Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Taylor, Rebecca
Thrush, Steven
author_sort Mylvaganam, Senthurun
collection PubMed
description Poly implant prostheses (PIP) implants have raised concern due to the increased reporting of ruptures prompting a UK review in 2012 recommending that symptomatic patients only undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explantation as necessary. Literature suggests two of three implant ruptures are asymptomatic. In this case, a 45-year-old woman with bilateral breast implants for cosmesis presented due to publicity of PIP implants. She was asymptomatic with no clinical signs suggestive of rupture. Due to patient intention for explanation of rupture, an MRI scan was undertaken which showed extensive silicone between the chest wall and lung bilaterally. The lung multidisciplinary team did not recommend removal of the lung silicone infiltrate. The implants were removed confirming rupture. Symptoms and signs cannot be relied upon to diagnose implant ruptures. Where patient concern exists with expressed intent for explantation if proven rupture, MRI assessment is a reliable tool where clinical uncertainty over rupture is present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3579812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35798122013-02-25 Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling Mylvaganam, Senthurun Taylor, Rebecca Thrush, Steven J Surg Case Rep Case Reports Poly implant prostheses (PIP) implants have raised concern due to the increased reporting of ruptures prompting a UK review in 2012 recommending that symptomatic patients only undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explantation as necessary. Literature suggests two of three implant ruptures are asymptomatic. In this case, a 45-year-old woman with bilateral breast implants for cosmesis presented due to publicity of PIP implants. She was asymptomatic with no clinical signs suggestive of rupture. Due to patient intention for explanation of rupture, an MRI scan was undertaken which showed extensive silicone between the chest wall and lung bilaterally. The lung multidisciplinary team did not recommend removal of the lung silicone infiltrate. The implants were removed confirming rupture. Symptoms and signs cannot be relied upon to diagnose implant ruptures. Where patient concern exists with expressed intent for explantation if proven rupture, MRI assessment is a reliable tool where clinical uncertainty over rupture is present. Oxford University Press 2013-02 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3579812/ /pubmed/24964409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjs044 Text en Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved. © The Author 2013. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Mylvaganam, Senthurun
Taylor, Rebecca
Thrush, Steven
Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling
title Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling
title_full Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling
title_fullStr Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling
title_full_unstemmed Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling
title_short Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling
title_sort poly implant breast implants (pip) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24964409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjs044
work_keys_str_mv AT mylvaganamsenthurun polyimplantbreastimplantspipandtheruptureriskinasymptomaticpatientsawarningforgreatercliniciansuspicioninassessmentandcounselling
AT taylorrebecca polyimplantbreastimplantspipandtheruptureriskinasymptomaticpatientsawarningforgreatercliniciansuspicioninassessmentandcounselling
AT thrushsteven polyimplantbreastimplantspipandtheruptureriskinasymptomaticpatientsawarningforgreatercliniciansuspicioninassessmentandcounselling