Cargando…
Centre Selection for Clinical Trials and the Generalisability of Results: A Mixed Methods Study
BACKGROUND: The rationale for centre selection in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often unclear but may have important implications for the generalisability of trial results. The aims of this study were to evaluate the factors which currently influence centre selection in RCTs and consider ho...
Autores principales: | Gheorghe, Adrian, Roberts, Tracy E., Ives, Jonathan C., Fletcher, Benjamin R., Calvert, Melanie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056560 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is ‘In-Trial’ Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review
por: Kyte, Derek G., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Correction: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is ‘In-Trial’ Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review
por: Kyte, Derek G., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Systematic Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Content of Clinical Trial Protocols
por: Kyte, Derek, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Assessment in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Guidance for Trial Protocol Writers
por: Calvert, Melanie, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Geography, generalisability, and susceptibility in clinical trials
por: Clougherty, Jane E, et al.
Publicado: (2021)