Cargando…

Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are one of the major complications in transplantation medicine. Vaccination-based prevention is desirable, but data on the response to active vaccination after SOT are conflicting. METHODS: In this systematic review, we identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eckerle, Isabella, Rosenberger, Kerstin Daniela, Zwahlen, Marcel, Junghanss, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056974
_version_ 1782260191799017472
author Eckerle, Isabella
Rosenberger, Kerstin Daniela
Zwahlen, Marcel
Junghanss, Thomas
author_facet Eckerle, Isabella
Rosenberger, Kerstin Daniela
Zwahlen, Marcel
Junghanss, Thomas
author_sort Eckerle, Isabella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are one of the major complications in transplantation medicine. Vaccination-based prevention is desirable, but data on the response to active vaccination after SOT are conflicting. METHODS: In this systematic review, we identify the serologic response rate of SOT recipients to post-transplantation vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, polio, hepatitis A and B, influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitides, tick-borne encephalitis, rabies, varicella, mumps, measles, and rubella. RESULTS: Of the 2478 papers initially identified, 72 were included in the final review. The most important findings are that (1) most clinical trials conducted and published over more than 30 years have all been small and highly heterogeneous regarding trial design, patient cohorts selected, patient inclusion criteria, dosing and vaccination schemes, follow up periods and outcomes assessed, (2) the individual vaccines investigated have been studied predominately only in one group of SOT recipients, i.e. tetanus, diphtheria and polio in RTX recipients, hepatitis A exclusively in adult LTX recipients and mumps, measles and rubella in paediatric LTX recipients, (3) SOT recipients mount an immune response which is for most vaccines lower than in healthy controls. The degree to which this response is impaired varies with the type of vaccine, age and organ transplanted and (4) for some vaccines antibodies decline rapidly. CONCLUSION: Vaccine-based prevention of infectious diseases is far from satisfactory in SOT recipients. Despite the large number of vaccination studies preformed over the past decades, knowledge on vaccination response is still limited. Even though the protection, which can be achieved in SOT recipients through vaccination, appears encouraging on the basis of available data, current vaccination guidelines and recommendations for post-SOT recipients remain poorly supported by evidence. There is an urgent need to conduct appropriately powered vaccination trials in well-defined SOT recipient cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3579937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35799372013-02-28 Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review Eckerle, Isabella Rosenberger, Kerstin Daniela Zwahlen, Marcel Junghanss, Thomas PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are one of the major complications in transplantation medicine. Vaccination-based prevention is desirable, but data on the response to active vaccination after SOT are conflicting. METHODS: In this systematic review, we identify the serologic response rate of SOT recipients to post-transplantation vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, polio, hepatitis A and B, influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitides, tick-borne encephalitis, rabies, varicella, mumps, measles, and rubella. RESULTS: Of the 2478 papers initially identified, 72 were included in the final review. The most important findings are that (1) most clinical trials conducted and published over more than 30 years have all been small and highly heterogeneous regarding trial design, patient cohorts selected, patient inclusion criteria, dosing and vaccination schemes, follow up periods and outcomes assessed, (2) the individual vaccines investigated have been studied predominately only in one group of SOT recipients, i.e. tetanus, diphtheria and polio in RTX recipients, hepatitis A exclusively in adult LTX recipients and mumps, measles and rubella in paediatric LTX recipients, (3) SOT recipients mount an immune response which is for most vaccines lower than in healthy controls. The degree to which this response is impaired varies with the type of vaccine, age and organ transplanted and (4) for some vaccines antibodies decline rapidly. CONCLUSION: Vaccine-based prevention of infectious diseases is far from satisfactory in SOT recipients. Despite the large number of vaccination studies preformed over the past decades, knowledge on vaccination response is still limited. Even though the protection, which can be achieved in SOT recipients through vaccination, appears encouraging on the basis of available data, current vaccination guidelines and recommendations for post-SOT recipients remain poorly supported by evidence. There is an urgent need to conduct appropriately powered vaccination trials in well-defined SOT recipient cohorts. Public Library of Science 2013-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3579937/ /pubmed/23451126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056974 Text en © 2013 Eckerle et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eckerle, Isabella
Rosenberger, Kerstin Daniela
Zwahlen, Marcel
Junghanss, Thomas
Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_full Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_short Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_sort serologic vaccination response after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056974
work_keys_str_mv AT eckerleisabella serologicvaccinationresponseaftersolidorgantransplantationasystematicreview
AT rosenbergerkerstindaniela serologicvaccinationresponseaftersolidorgantransplantationasystematicreview
AT zwahlenmarcel serologicvaccinationresponseaftersolidorgantransplantationasystematicreview
AT junghanssthomas serologicvaccinationresponseaftersolidorgantransplantationasystematicreview