Cargando…

Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent

BACKGROUND: As part of national policy to manage the increasing burden of chronic diseases, the Department of Health in England has launched the NHS Health Checks programme, which aims to reduce the burden of the major vascular diseases on the health service. METHODS: A cross-sectional review of res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cochrane, Thomas, Gidlow, Christopher J., Kumar, Jagdish, Mawby, Yvonne, Iqbal, Zafar, Chambers, Ruth M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23104892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds088
_version_ 1782260201001320448
author Cochrane, Thomas
Gidlow, Christopher J.
Kumar, Jagdish
Mawby, Yvonne
Iqbal, Zafar
Chambers, Ruth M.
author_facet Cochrane, Thomas
Gidlow, Christopher J.
Kumar, Jagdish
Mawby, Yvonne
Iqbal, Zafar
Chambers, Ruth M.
author_sort Cochrane, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As part of national policy to manage the increasing burden of chronic diseases, the Department of Health in England has launched the NHS Health Checks programme, which aims to reduce the burden of the major vascular diseases on the health service. METHODS: A cross-sectional review of response, attendance and treatment uptake over the first year of the programme in Stoke on Trent was carried out. Patients aged between 32 and 74 years and estimated to be at ≥20% risk of developing cardiovascular disease were identified from electronic medical records. Multi-level regression modelling was used to evaluate the influence of individual- and practice-level factors on health check outcomes. RESULTS: Overall 63.3% of patients responded, 43.7% attended and 29.8% took up a treatment following their health check invitation. The response was higher for older age and more affluent areas; attendance and treatment uptake were higher for males and older age. Variance between practices was significant (P < 0.001) for response (13.4%), attendance (12.7%) and uptake (23%). CONCLUSIONS: The attendance rate of 43.7% following invitation to a health check was considerably lower than the benchmark of 75%. The lack of public interest and the prevalence of significant comorbidity are challenges to this national policy innovation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35800532013-02-25 Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent Cochrane, Thomas Gidlow, Christopher J. Kumar, Jagdish Mawby, Yvonne Iqbal, Zafar Chambers, Ruth M. J Public Health (Oxf) Health Services BACKGROUND: As part of national policy to manage the increasing burden of chronic diseases, the Department of Health in England has launched the NHS Health Checks programme, which aims to reduce the burden of the major vascular diseases on the health service. METHODS: A cross-sectional review of response, attendance and treatment uptake over the first year of the programme in Stoke on Trent was carried out. Patients aged between 32 and 74 years and estimated to be at ≥20% risk of developing cardiovascular disease were identified from electronic medical records. Multi-level regression modelling was used to evaluate the influence of individual- and practice-level factors on health check outcomes. RESULTS: Overall 63.3% of patients responded, 43.7% attended and 29.8% took up a treatment following their health check invitation. The response was higher for older age and more affluent areas; attendance and treatment uptake were higher for males and older age. Variance between practices was significant (P < 0.001) for response (13.4%), attendance (12.7%) and uptake (23%). CONCLUSIONS: The attendance rate of 43.7% following invitation to a health check was considerably lower than the benchmark of 75%. The lack of public interest and the prevalence of significant comorbidity are challenges to this national policy innovation. Oxford University Press 2013-03 2012-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3580053/ /pubmed/23104892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds088 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Health Services
Cochrane, Thomas
Gidlow, Christopher J.
Kumar, Jagdish
Mawby, Yvonne
Iqbal, Zafar
Chambers, Ruth M.
Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent
title Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent
title_full Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent
title_fullStr Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent
title_short Cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the NHS Health Checks programme in Stoke on Trent
title_sort cross-sectional review of the response and treatment uptake from the nhs health checks programme in stoke on trent
topic Health Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23104892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds088
work_keys_str_mv AT cochranethomas crosssectionalreviewoftheresponseandtreatmentuptakefromthenhshealthchecksprogrammeinstokeontrent
AT gidlowchristopherj crosssectionalreviewoftheresponseandtreatmentuptakefromthenhshealthchecksprogrammeinstokeontrent
AT kumarjagdish crosssectionalreviewoftheresponseandtreatmentuptakefromthenhshealthchecksprogrammeinstokeontrent
AT mawbyyvonne crosssectionalreviewoftheresponseandtreatmentuptakefromthenhshealthchecksprogrammeinstokeontrent
AT iqbalzafar crosssectionalreviewoftheresponseandtreatmentuptakefromthenhshealthchecksprogrammeinstokeontrent
AT chambersruthm crosssectionalreviewoftheresponseandtreatmentuptakefromthenhshealthchecksprogrammeinstokeontrent