Cargando…

Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation

INTRODUCTION: The influence of genetic background on the ability to generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has the potential to impact future applications, but has yet to be examined in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine if genetic background affects the efficiency of genera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnabel, Lauren V, Abratte, Christian M, Schimenti, John C, Southard, Teresa L, Fortier, Lisa A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22862934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/scrt121
_version_ 1782260254716723200
author Schnabel, Lauren V
Abratte, Christian M
Schimenti, John C
Southard, Teresa L
Fortier, Lisa A
author_facet Schnabel, Lauren V
Abratte, Christian M
Schimenti, John C
Southard, Teresa L
Fortier, Lisa A
author_sort Schnabel, Lauren V
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The influence of genetic background on the ability to generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has the potential to impact future applications, but has yet to be examined in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine if genetic background affects the efficiency of generating iPSCs during early reprograming as well as the pluripotent stability of the iPSCs during later stages of reprograming. METHODS: Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were isolated from six strains of mice (NON/LtJ; C57BL/6J; DBA/2J; BALB/cJ; 129S1/SvlmJ; CAST/EiJ) that were selected based on genetic diversity and differences in ability to produce embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines. MEFs were reprogramed via doxycycline-inducible lentiviral transduction of murine Oct4, Klf4, Sox2, and c-Myc. Differences in efficiency to generate iPSCs were assessed by comparing the total number of colonies, the percentage of colonies positive for alkaline phosphatase staining and the percentage of cells positive for SSEA1. iPSC colonies were expanded to establish doxycycline-independent cell lines whose pluripotency was then evaluated via ability to form teratomas in NOD.CB17-Prkdc(scid)/J mice. Proliferation of non-transduced parent MEFs from each strain was also examined over ten days under conditions that simulated reprograming. RESULTS: NON/LtJ and CAST/EiJ strains were more efficient than other strains in generating iPSCs for all parameters measured and parent MEFs from these strains were more proliferative than those from other strains. Doxycycline-independent iPSC lines were established using standard conditions for all strains except BALB/cJ, which required a higher concentration (5x) of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). iPSCs from all strains were capable of producing teratomas in NOD.CB17-Prkdc(scid)/J mice. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that genetic background does affect iPSC generation and pluripotent stability. In addition, our results demonstrate that strain differences in efficiency to generate iPSCs during the early stages of reprograming are correlated with those observed in proliferation of parent MEFs. These findings have important implications both for future iPSC applications as well as for future investigation into determining the genes responsible for reprograming efficiency and stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35804682013-02-26 Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation Schnabel, Lauren V Abratte, Christian M Schimenti, John C Southard, Teresa L Fortier, Lisa A Stem Cell Res Ther Research INTRODUCTION: The influence of genetic background on the ability to generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has the potential to impact future applications, but has yet to be examined in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine if genetic background affects the efficiency of generating iPSCs during early reprograming as well as the pluripotent stability of the iPSCs during later stages of reprograming. METHODS: Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were isolated from six strains of mice (NON/LtJ; C57BL/6J; DBA/2J; BALB/cJ; 129S1/SvlmJ; CAST/EiJ) that were selected based on genetic diversity and differences in ability to produce embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines. MEFs were reprogramed via doxycycline-inducible lentiviral transduction of murine Oct4, Klf4, Sox2, and c-Myc. Differences in efficiency to generate iPSCs were assessed by comparing the total number of colonies, the percentage of colonies positive for alkaline phosphatase staining and the percentage of cells positive for SSEA1. iPSC colonies were expanded to establish doxycycline-independent cell lines whose pluripotency was then evaluated via ability to form teratomas in NOD.CB17-Prkdc(scid)/J mice. Proliferation of non-transduced parent MEFs from each strain was also examined over ten days under conditions that simulated reprograming. RESULTS: NON/LtJ and CAST/EiJ strains were more efficient than other strains in generating iPSCs for all parameters measured and parent MEFs from these strains were more proliferative than those from other strains. Doxycycline-independent iPSC lines were established using standard conditions for all strains except BALB/cJ, which required a higher concentration (5x) of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). iPSCs from all strains were capable of producing teratomas in NOD.CB17-Prkdc(scid)/J mice. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that genetic background does affect iPSC generation and pluripotent stability. In addition, our results demonstrate that strain differences in efficiency to generate iPSCs during the early stages of reprograming are correlated with those observed in proliferation of parent MEFs. These findings have important implications both for future iPSC applications as well as for future investigation into determining the genes responsible for reprograming efficiency and stability. BioMed Central 2012-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3580468/ /pubmed/22862934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/scrt121 Text en Copyright ©2012 Schnabel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Schnabel, Lauren V
Abratte, Christian M
Schimenti, John C
Southard, Teresa L
Fortier, Lisa A
Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation
title Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation
title_full Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation
title_fullStr Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation
title_full_unstemmed Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation
title_short Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation
title_sort genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22862934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/scrt121
work_keys_str_mv AT schnabellaurenv geneticbackgroundaffectsinducedpluripotentstemcellgeneration
AT abrattechristianm geneticbackgroundaffectsinducedpluripotentstemcellgeneration
AT schimentijohnc geneticbackgroundaffectsinducedpluripotentstemcellgeneration
AT southardteresal geneticbackgroundaffectsinducedpluripotentstemcellgeneration
AT fortierlisaa geneticbackgroundaffectsinducedpluripotentstemcellgeneration