Cargando…

Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention

INTRODUCTION: In the past two decades, healthcare adopted industrial strategies for process measurement and control. In the industry model, care is taken to avoid minimal deviations from a standard. In healthcare there is scarce data to support that a similar strategy can lead to better outcomes. Br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amaral, Andre CKB, Kure, Lars, Jeffs, Angie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22568970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11335
_version_ 1782260291871965184
author Amaral, Andre CKB
Kure, Lars
Jeffs, Angie
author_facet Amaral, Andre CKB
Kure, Lars
Jeffs, Angie
author_sort Amaral, Andre CKB
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the past two decades, healthcare adopted industrial strategies for process measurement and control. In the industry model, care is taken to avoid minimal deviations from a standard. In healthcare there is scarce data to support that a similar strategy can lead to better outcomes. Briefly, when compliance is high, further attempts to improve uptake of a process are seldom made. Our intensive care unit (ICU) improved the compliance with minimizing sedation from a high baseline of 80.4% (95% CI: 66.9 to 90.2) to 96.2% (95% CI: 95.2 to 97.0) 12 months after a quality improvement initiative. We sought to measure whether this minute improvement in compliance led to a reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We collected data on compliance with the process during 12 months. A trained data collector abstracted data from charts every other day. Our database contains data for length of mechanical ventilation, mortality, type of admission, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores for the 12 months before and after the process improvement. To control for secular trends we used an interrupted-time series with adjustment for auto-correlation. We calculated the expected length of mechanical ventilation on each month by the end of the intervention period, and calculated the fitted value for the post-intervention months. RESULTS: We included 1556 patients. There was an immediate effect of the intervention (regression coefficient = -0.129, P value < 0.001) and the secular trend was a determinant of length of mechanical ventilation (regression coefficient = 0.010, P value = 0.004). The trend post-intervention was not significant (regression coefficient = 0.004, P value = 0.380). The relative change in the length of mechanical ventilation was 14.5% (IQR 13.8% to 15.8%) and the total expected decrease in mechanical ventilation days was 502.7 days (95% CI 300.9 to 729.1) over one year. CONCLUSIONS: In a system already working at high levels of compliance, outcomes can still be improved. Our intervention was successful in reducing the length of mechanical ventilation. ICUs should have a process of quality assurance in place to provide constant monitoring of key quality of care processes and correct deviations from the proposed standard.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35806202013-02-26 Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention Amaral, Andre CKB Kure, Lars Jeffs, Angie Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: In the past two decades, healthcare adopted industrial strategies for process measurement and control. In the industry model, care is taken to avoid minimal deviations from a standard. In healthcare there is scarce data to support that a similar strategy can lead to better outcomes. Briefly, when compliance is high, further attempts to improve uptake of a process are seldom made. Our intensive care unit (ICU) improved the compliance with minimizing sedation from a high baseline of 80.4% (95% CI: 66.9 to 90.2) to 96.2% (95% CI: 95.2 to 97.0) 12 months after a quality improvement initiative. We sought to measure whether this minute improvement in compliance led to a reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We collected data on compliance with the process during 12 months. A trained data collector abstracted data from charts every other day. Our database contains data for length of mechanical ventilation, mortality, type of admission, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores for the 12 months before and after the process improvement. To control for secular trends we used an interrupted-time series with adjustment for auto-correlation. We calculated the expected length of mechanical ventilation on each month by the end of the intervention period, and calculated the fitted value for the post-intervention months. RESULTS: We included 1556 patients. There was an immediate effect of the intervention (regression coefficient = -0.129, P value < 0.001) and the secular trend was a determinant of length of mechanical ventilation (regression coefficient = 0.010, P value = 0.004). The trend post-intervention was not significant (regression coefficient = 0.004, P value = 0.380). The relative change in the length of mechanical ventilation was 14.5% (IQR 13.8% to 15.8%) and the total expected decrease in mechanical ventilation days was 502.7 days (95% CI 300.9 to 729.1) over one year. CONCLUSIONS: In a system already working at high levels of compliance, outcomes can still be improved. Our intervention was successful in reducing the length of mechanical ventilation. ICUs should have a process of quality assurance in place to provide constant monitoring of key quality of care processes and correct deviations from the proposed standard. BioMed Central 2012 2012-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3580620/ /pubmed/22568970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11335 Text en Copyright ©2012 Amaral et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Amaral, Andre CKB
Kure, Lars
Jeffs, Angie
Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention
title Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention
title_full Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention
title_fullStr Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention
title_full_unstemmed Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention
title_short Effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention
title_sort effects of increasing compliance with minimal sedation on duration of mechanical ventilation: a quality improvement intervention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22568970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11335
work_keys_str_mv AT amaralandreckb effectsofincreasingcompliancewithminimalsedationondurationofmechanicalventilationaqualityimprovementintervention
AT kurelars effectsofincreasingcompliancewithminimalsedationondurationofmechanicalventilationaqualityimprovementintervention
AT jeffsangie effectsofincreasingcompliancewithminimalsedationondurationofmechanicalventilationaqualityimprovementintervention