Cargando…

Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting

INTRODUCTION: In the emergency setting, focused cardiac ultrasound has become a fundamental tool for diagnostic, initial emergency treatment and triage decisions. A new ultra-miniaturized pocket ultrasound device (PUD) may be suited to this specific setting. Therefore, we aimed to compare the diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biais, Matthieu, Carrié, Cédric, Delaunay, François, Morel, Nicolas, Revel, Philippe, Janvier, Gérard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11340
_version_ 1782260293057904640
author Biais, Matthieu
Carrié, Cédric
Delaunay, François
Morel, Nicolas
Revel, Philippe
Janvier, Gérard
author_facet Biais, Matthieu
Carrié, Cédric
Delaunay, François
Morel, Nicolas
Revel, Philippe
Janvier, Gérard
author_sort Biais, Matthieu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the emergency setting, focused cardiac ultrasound has become a fundamental tool for diagnostic, initial emergency treatment and triage decisions. A new ultra-miniaturized pocket ultrasound device (PUD) may be suited to this specific setting. Therefore, we aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of an ultra-miniaturized ultrasound device (Vscan™, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI) and of a conventional high-quality echocardiography system (Vivid S5™, GE Healthcare) for a cardiac focused ultrasonography in patients admitted to the emergency department. METHODS: During 4 months, patients admitted to our emergency department and requiring transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were included in this single-center, prospective and observational study. Patients underwent TTE using a PUD and a conventional echocardiography system. Each examination was performed independently by a physician experienced in echocardiography, unaware of the results found by the alternative device. During the focused cardiac echocardiography, the following parameters were assessed: global cardiac systolic function, identification of ventricular enlargement or hypertrophy, assessment for pericardial effusion and estimation of the size and the respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one (151) patients were analyzed. With the tested PUD, the image quality was sufficient to perform focused cardiac ultrasonography in all patients. Examination using PUD adequately qualified with a very good agreement global left ventricular systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.76-0.97), severe right ventricular dilation (κ = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.71-1.00), inferior vena cava dilation (κ = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.80-1.00), respiratory-induced variations in inferior vena cava size in spontaneous breathing (κ = 0.84; 95%CI: 0.71-0.98), pericardial effusion (κ = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.55-0.95) and compressive pericardial effusion (κ = 1.00; 95%CI: 1.00-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: In an emergency setting, this new ultraportable echoscope (PUD) was reliable for the real-time detection of focused cardiac abnormalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35806252013-02-26 Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting Biais, Matthieu Carrié, Cédric Delaunay, François Morel, Nicolas Revel, Philippe Janvier, Gérard Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: In the emergency setting, focused cardiac ultrasound has become a fundamental tool for diagnostic, initial emergency treatment and triage decisions. A new ultra-miniaturized pocket ultrasound device (PUD) may be suited to this specific setting. Therefore, we aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of an ultra-miniaturized ultrasound device (Vscan™, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI) and of a conventional high-quality echocardiography system (Vivid S5™, GE Healthcare) for a cardiac focused ultrasonography in patients admitted to the emergency department. METHODS: During 4 months, patients admitted to our emergency department and requiring transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were included in this single-center, prospective and observational study. Patients underwent TTE using a PUD and a conventional echocardiography system. Each examination was performed independently by a physician experienced in echocardiography, unaware of the results found by the alternative device. During the focused cardiac echocardiography, the following parameters were assessed: global cardiac systolic function, identification of ventricular enlargement or hypertrophy, assessment for pericardial effusion and estimation of the size and the respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one (151) patients were analyzed. With the tested PUD, the image quality was sufficient to perform focused cardiac ultrasonography in all patients. Examination using PUD adequately qualified with a very good agreement global left ventricular systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.76-0.97), severe right ventricular dilation (κ = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.71-1.00), inferior vena cava dilation (κ = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.80-1.00), respiratory-induced variations in inferior vena cava size in spontaneous breathing (κ = 0.84; 95%CI: 0.71-0.98), pericardial effusion (κ = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.55-0.95) and compressive pericardial effusion (κ = 1.00; 95%CI: 1.00-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: In an emergency setting, this new ultraportable echoscope (PUD) was reliable for the real-time detection of focused cardiac abnormalities. BioMed Central 2012 2012-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3580625/ /pubmed/22583539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11340 Text en Copyright ©2012 Biais et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Biais, Matthieu
Carrié, Cédric
Delaunay, François
Morel, Nicolas
Revel, Philippe
Janvier, Gérard
Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting
title Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting
title_full Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting
title_short Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting
title_sort evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11340
work_keys_str_mv AT biaismatthieu evaluationofanewpocketechoscopicdeviceforfocusedcardiacultrasonographyinanemergencysetting
AT carriecedric evaluationofanewpocketechoscopicdeviceforfocusedcardiacultrasonographyinanemergencysetting
AT delaunayfrancois evaluationofanewpocketechoscopicdeviceforfocusedcardiacultrasonographyinanemergencysetting
AT morelnicolas evaluationofanewpocketechoscopicdeviceforfocusedcardiacultrasonographyinanemergencysetting
AT revelphilippe evaluationofanewpocketechoscopicdeviceforfocusedcardiacultrasonographyinanemergencysetting
AT janviergerard evaluationofanewpocketechoscopicdeviceforfocusedcardiacultrasonographyinanemergencysetting