Cargando…
A pilot prospective study on closed loop controlled ventilation and oxygenation in ventilated children during the weaning phase
INTRODUCTION: The present study is a pilot prospective safety evaluation of a new closed loop computerised protocol on ventilation and oxygenation in stable, spontaneously breathing children weighing more than 7 kg, during the weaning phase of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11343 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: The present study is a pilot prospective safety evaluation of a new closed loop computerised protocol on ventilation and oxygenation in stable, spontaneously breathing children weighing more than 7 kg, during the weaning phase of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated children ready to start the weaning process were ventilated for five periods of 60 minutes in the following order: pressure support ventilation, adaptive support ventilation (ASV), ASV plus a ventilation controller (ASV-CO(2)), ASV-CO(2 )plus an oxygenation controller (ASV-CO(2)-O(2)) and pressure support ventilation again. Based on breath-by-breath analysis, the percentage of time with normal ventilation as defined by a respiratory rate between 10 and 40 breaths/minute, tidal volume > 5 ml/kg predicted body weight and end-tidal CO(2 )between 25 and 55 mmHg was determined. The number of manipulations and changes on the ventilator were also recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen children, median aged 45 months, were investigated. No adverse event and no premature protocol termination were reported. ASV-CO(2 )and ASV-CO(2)-O(2 )kept the patients within normal ventilation for, respectively, 94% (91 to 96%) and 94% (87 to 96%) of the time. The tidal volume, respiratory rate, peak inspiratory airway pressure and minute ventilation were equivalent for all modalities, although there were more automatic setting changes in ASV-CO(2 )and ASV-CO(2)-O(2). Positive end-expiratory pressure modifications by ASV-CO(2)-O(2 )require further investigation. CONCLUSION: Over the short study period and in this specific population, ASV-CO(2 )and ASV-CO(2)-O(2 )were safe and kept the patient under normal ventilation most of the time. Further research is needed, especially for positive end-expiratory pressure modifications by ASV-CO(2)-O(2). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01095406 |
---|