Cargando…
Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
Heparin-binding protein (HBP), also known as azurocidin, has multiple functions in the inflammatory process, especially during severe infections. Beside its antimicrobial properties, HBP may induce vascular leakage leading to extravascular efflux, which is an important pathophysiologic event in the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11379 |
_version_ | 1782260300512231424 |
---|---|
author | Holub, Michal Beran, Ondřj |
author_facet | Holub, Michal Beran, Ondřj |
author_sort | Holub, Michal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Heparin-binding protein (HBP), also known as azurocidin, has multiple functions in the inflammatory process, especially during severe infections. Beside its antimicrobial properties, HBP may induce vascular leakage leading to extravascular efflux, which is an important pathophysiologic event in the development of septic shock. Not surprisingly, high HBP plasma levels are found in severe sepsis patients and in septic shock patients as well as in serious infections associated with endothelial damage. In the present issue of Critical Care, Linder and colleagues demonstrate new aspects of HBP daily monitoring in ICU patients. The authors observed that high HBP plasma levels are associated with an increased mortality rate in both septic and nonseptic critically ill patients, indicating that HBP may be a reliable prognostic biomarker. However, there are some limitations hindering rapid translation of these interesting findings into the daily routine. First, the group of nonseptic critically ill patients (n = 28) enrolled in the study was rather small as compared with the septic group (n = 151). Moreover, 50% of nonseptic patients developed infection while hospitalized in the ICU, and to classify them as truly nonseptic patients is problematic. Second, there is a lack of a routine diagnostic method for HBP analysis. Nevertheless, if the results of the present study are validated in large clinical trials in different ICU populations and cost-effectiveness data become available, the serial HBP measurements will have a promising future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3580656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35806562013-06-28 Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? Holub, Michal Beran, Ondřj Crit Care Commentary Heparin-binding protein (HBP), also known as azurocidin, has multiple functions in the inflammatory process, especially during severe infections. Beside its antimicrobial properties, HBP may induce vascular leakage leading to extravascular efflux, which is an important pathophysiologic event in the development of septic shock. Not surprisingly, high HBP plasma levels are found in severe sepsis patients and in septic shock patients as well as in serious infections associated with endothelial damage. In the present issue of Critical Care, Linder and colleagues demonstrate new aspects of HBP daily monitoring in ICU patients. The authors observed that high HBP plasma levels are associated with an increased mortality rate in both septic and nonseptic critically ill patients, indicating that HBP may be a reliable prognostic biomarker. However, there are some limitations hindering rapid translation of these interesting findings into the daily routine. First, the group of nonseptic critically ill patients (n = 28) enrolled in the study was rather small as compared with the septic group (n = 151). Moreover, 50% of nonseptic patients developed infection while hospitalized in the ICU, and to classify them as truly nonseptic patients is problematic. Second, there is a lack of a routine diagnostic method for HBP analysis. Nevertheless, if the results of the present study are validated in large clinical trials in different ICU populations and cost-effectiveness data become available, the serial HBP measurements will have a promising future. BioMed Central 2012 2012-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3580656/ /pubmed/22748111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11379 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Holub, Michal Beran, Ondřj Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? |
title | Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? |
title_full | Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? |
title_fullStr | Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? |
title_short | Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? |
title_sort | should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holubmichal shouldheparinbindingproteinlevelsberoutinelymonitoredinpatientswithseveresepsisandsepticshock AT beranondrj shouldheparinbindingproteinlevelsberoutinelymonitoredinpatientswithseveresepsisandsepticshock |