Cargando…

Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?

Heparin-binding protein (HBP), also known as azurocidin, has multiple functions in the inflammatory process, especially during severe infections. Beside its antimicrobial properties, HBP may induce vascular leakage leading to extravascular efflux, which is an important pathophysiologic event in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holub, Michal, Beran, Ondřj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11379
_version_ 1782260300512231424
author Holub, Michal
Beran, Ondřj
author_facet Holub, Michal
Beran, Ondřj
author_sort Holub, Michal
collection PubMed
description Heparin-binding protein (HBP), also known as azurocidin, has multiple functions in the inflammatory process, especially during severe infections. Beside its antimicrobial properties, HBP may induce vascular leakage leading to extravascular efflux, which is an important pathophysiologic event in the development of septic shock. Not surprisingly, high HBP plasma levels are found in severe sepsis patients and in septic shock patients as well as in serious infections associated with endothelial damage. In the present issue of Critical Care, Linder and colleagues demonstrate new aspects of HBP daily monitoring in ICU patients. The authors observed that high HBP plasma levels are associated with an increased mortality rate in both septic and nonseptic critically ill patients, indicating that HBP may be a reliable prognostic biomarker. However, there are some limitations hindering rapid translation of these interesting findings into the daily routine. First, the group of nonseptic critically ill patients (n = 28) enrolled in the study was rather small as compared with the septic group (n = 151). Moreover, 50% of nonseptic patients developed infection while hospitalized in the ICU, and to classify them as truly nonseptic patients is problematic. Second, there is a lack of a routine diagnostic method for HBP analysis. Nevertheless, if the results of the present study are validated in large clinical trials in different ICU populations and cost-effectiveness data become available, the serial HBP measurements will have a promising future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35806562013-06-28 Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? Holub, Michal Beran, Ondřj Crit Care Commentary Heparin-binding protein (HBP), also known as azurocidin, has multiple functions in the inflammatory process, especially during severe infections. Beside its antimicrobial properties, HBP may induce vascular leakage leading to extravascular efflux, which is an important pathophysiologic event in the development of septic shock. Not surprisingly, high HBP plasma levels are found in severe sepsis patients and in septic shock patients as well as in serious infections associated with endothelial damage. In the present issue of Critical Care, Linder and colleagues demonstrate new aspects of HBP daily monitoring in ICU patients. The authors observed that high HBP plasma levels are associated with an increased mortality rate in both septic and nonseptic critically ill patients, indicating that HBP may be a reliable prognostic biomarker. However, there are some limitations hindering rapid translation of these interesting findings into the daily routine. First, the group of nonseptic critically ill patients (n = 28) enrolled in the study was rather small as compared with the septic group (n = 151). Moreover, 50% of nonseptic patients developed infection while hospitalized in the ICU, and to classify them as truly nonseptic patients is problematic. Second, there is a lack of a routine diagnostic method for HBP analysis. Nevertheless, if the results of the present study are validated in large clinical trials in different ICU populations and cost-effectiveness data become available, the serial HBP measurements will have a promising future. BioMed Central 2012 2012-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3580656/ /pubmed/22748111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11379 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Holub, Michal
Beran, Ondřj
Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
title Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
title_full Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
title_fullStr Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
title_full_unstemmed Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
title_short Should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
title_sort should heparin-binding protein levels be routinely monitored in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22748111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11379
work_keys_str_mv AT holubmichal shouldheparinbindingproteinlevelsberoutinelymonitoredinpatientswithseveresepsisandsepticshock
AT beranondrj shouldheparinbindingproteinlevelsberoutinelymonitoredinpatientswithseveresepsisandsepticshock