Cargando…

Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score

INTRODUCTION: A key aim of triage is to identify those with high risk of cardiac arrest, as they require intensive monitoring, resuscitation facilities, and early intervention. We aim to validate a novel machine learning (ML) score incorporating heart rate variability (HRV) for triage of critically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Marcus Eng Hock, Lee Ng, Christina Hui, Goh, Ken, Liu, Nan, Koh, Zhi Xiong, Shahidah, Nur, Zhang, Tong Tong, Fook-Chong, Stephanie, Lin, Zhiping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22715923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11396
_version_ 1782260302852653056
author Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
Lee Ng, Christina Hui
Goh, Ken
Liu, Nan
Koh, Zhi Xiong
Shahidah, Nur
Zhang, Tong Tong
Fook-Chong, Stephanie
Lin, Zhiping
author_facet Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
Lee Ng, Christina Hui
Goh, Ken
Liu, Nan
Koh, Zhi Xiong
Shahidah, Nur
Zhang, Tong Tong
Fook-Chong, Stephanie
Lin, Zhiping
author_sort Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A key aim of triage is to identify those with high risk of cardiac arrest, as they require intensive monitoring, resuscitation facilities, and early intervention. We aim to validate a novel machine learning (ML) score incorporating heart rate variability (HRV) for triage of critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department by comparing the area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity with the modified early warning score (MEWS). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of critically ill patients (Patient Acuity Category Scale 1 and 2) in an emergency department of a tertiary hospital. At presentation, HRV parameters generated from a 5-minute electrocardiogram recording are incorporated with age and vital signs to generate the ML score for each patient. The patients are then followed up for outcomes of cardiac arrest or death. RESULTS: From June 2006 to June 2008 we enrolled 925 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for ML scores in predicting cardiac arrest within 72 hours is 0.781, compared with 0.680 for MEWS (difference in AUROC: 0.101, 95% confidence interval: 0.006 to 0.197). As for in-hospital death, the area under the curve for ML score is 0.741, compared with 0.693 for MEWS (difference in AUROC: 0.048, 95% confidence interval: -0.023 to 0.119). A cutoff ML score ≥ 60 predicted cardiac arrest with a sensitivity of 84.1%, specificity of 72.3% and negative predictive value of 98.8%. A cutoff MEWS ≥ 3 predicted cardiac arrest with a sensitivity of 74.4%, specificity of 54.2% and negative predictive value of 97.8%. CONCLUSION: We found ML scores to be more accurate than the MEWS in predicting cardiac arrest within 72 hours. There is potential to develop bedside devices for risk stratification based on cardiac arrest prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35806662013-02-26 Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score Ong, Marcus Eng Hock Lee Ng, Christina Hui Goh, Ken Liu, Nan Koh, Zhi Xiong Shahidah, Nur Zhang, Tong Tong Fook-Chong, Stephanie Lin, Zhiping Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: A key aim of triage is to identify those with high risk of cardiac arrest, as they require intensive monitoring, resuscitation facilities, and early intervention. We aim to validate a novel machine learning (ML) score incorporating heart rate variability (HRV) for triage of critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department by comparing the area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity with the modified early warning score (MEWS). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of critically ill patients (Patient Acuity Category Scale 1 and 2) in an emergency department of a tertiary hospital. At presentation, HRV parameters generated from a 5-minute electrocardiogram recording are incorporated with age and vital signs to generate the ML score for each patient. The patients are then followed up for outcomes of cardiac arrest or death. RESULTS: From June 2006 to June 2008 we enrolled 925 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for ML scores in predicting cardiac arrest within 72 hours is 0.781, compared with 0.680 for MEWS (difference in AUROC: 0.101, 95% confidence interval: 0.006 to 0.197). As for in-hospital death, the area under the curve for ML score is 0.741, compared with 0.693 for MEWS (difference in AUROC: 0.048, 95% confidence interval: -0.023 to 0.119). A cutoff ML score ≥ 60 predicted cardiac arrest with a sensitivity of 84.1%, specificity of 72.3% and negative predictive value of 98.8%. A cutoff MEWS ≥ 3 predicted cardiac arrest with a sensitivity of 74.4%, specificity of 54.2% and negative predictive value of 97.8%. CONCLUSION: We found ML scores to be more accurate than the MEWS in predicting cardiac arrest within 72 hours. There is potential to develop bedside devices for risk stratification based on cardiac arrest prediction. BioMed Central 2012 2012-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3580666/ /pubmed/22715923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11396 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
Lee Ng, Christina Hui
Goh, Ken
Liu, Nan
Koh, Zhi Xiong
Shahidah, Nur
Zhang, Tong Tong
Fook-Chong, Stephanie
Lin, Zhiping
Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score
title Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score
title_full Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score
title_fullStr Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score
title_short Prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score
title_sort prediction of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department using a machine learning score incorporating heart rate variability compared with the modified early warning score
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22715923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11396
work_keys_str_mv AT ongmarcusenghock predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT leengchristinahui predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT gohken predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT liunan predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT kohzhixiong predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT shahidahnur predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT zhangtongtong predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT fookchongstephanie predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore
AT linzhiping predictionofcardiacarrestincriticallyillpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentusingamachinelearningscoreincorporatingheartratevariabilitycomparedwiththemodifiedearlywarningscore