Cargando…

The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to identify and characterize the most highly cited clinical research articles published on sepsis. METHODS: A comprehensive list of citation classics in sepsis was generated by searching the database of Web of Science-Expanded (1970 to present) using key...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Tianzhu, Zhao, Xiaohong, Lou, Jingsheng, Bo, Lulong, Wang, Fei, Li, Jinbao, Deng, Xiaoming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22731930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11401
_version_ 1782260303336046592
author Tao, Tianzhu
Zhao, Xiaohong
Lou, Jingsheng
Bo, Lulong
Wang, Fei
Li, Jinbao
Deng, Xiaoming
author_facet Tao, Tianzhu
Zhao, Xiaohong
Lou, Jingsheng
Bo, Lulong
Wang, Fei
Li, Jinbao
Deng, Xiaoming
author_sort Tao, Tianzhu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to identify and characterize the most highly cited clinical research articles published on sepsis. METHODS: A comprehensive list of citation classics in sepsis was generated by searching the database of Web of Science-Expanded (1970 to present) using keywords 'sepsis' or 'septic shock'. The top 50 cited clinical research papers were retrieved by reading the abstract or full text if needed. Each eligible article was reviewed for basic information, including country of origin, article type, journals, authors, and funding sources. RESULTS: A total of 2,151 articles were cited more than 100 times; the 50 top-cited clinical articles were published between 1974 and 2008. The number of citations ranged from 372 to 2,932, with a mean of 678 citations per article. These citation classics came from nine countries, of which 26 articles came from the United States. Rush University and the University of Pittsburgh lead the list of classics with six papers each. The 50 top-cited articles were published in 17 journals, with the New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Association topping the list. The top 50 articles consisted of 21 clinical trials and 29 observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our bibliometric analysis provides a historical perspective on the progress of clinical research on sepsis. Articles originating from the United States and published in high-impact journals are most likely to be cited in the field of sepsis research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35806682013-02-26 The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis Tao, Tianzhu Zhao, Xiaohong Lou, Jingsheng Bo, Lulong Wang, Fei Li, Jinbao Deng, Xiaoming Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to identify and characterize the most highly cited clinical research articles published on sepsis. METHODS: A comprehensive list of citation classics in sepsis was generated by searching the database of Web of Science-Expanded (1970 to present) using keywords 'sepsis' or 'septic shock'. The top 50 cited clinical research papers were retrieved by reading the abstract or full text if needed. Each eligible article was reviewed for basic information, including country of origin, article type, journals, authors, and funding sources. RESULTS: A total of 2,151 articles were cited more than 100 times; the 50 top-cited clinical articles were published between 1974 and 2008. The number of citations ranged from 372 to 2,932, with a mean of 678 citations per article. These citation classics came from nine countries, of which 26 articles came from the United States. Rush University and the University of Pittsburgh lead the list of classics with six papers each. The 50 top-cited articles were published in 17 journals, with the New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Association topping the list. The top 50 articles consisted of 21 clinical trials and 29 observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our bibliometric analysis provides a historical perspective on the progress of clinical research on sepsis. Articles originating from the United States and published in high-impact journals are most likely to be cited in the field of sepsis research. BioMed Central 2012 2012-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3580668/ /pubmed/22731930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11401 Text en Copyright ©2012 Tao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tao, Tianzhu
Zhao, Xiaohong
Lou, Jingsheng
Bo, Lulong
Wang, Fei
Li, Jinbao
Deng, Xiaoming
The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis
title The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis
title_full The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis
title_short The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis
title_sort top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22731930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11401
work_keys_str_mv AT taotianzhu thetopcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT zhaoxiaohong thetopcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT loujingsheng thetopcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT bolulong thetopcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT wangfei thetopcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT lijinbao thetopcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT dengxiaoming thetopcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT taotianzhu topcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT zhaoxiaohong topcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT loujingsheng topcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT bolulong topcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT wangfei topcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT lijinbao topcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis
AT dengxiaoming topcitedclinicalresearcharticlesonsepsisabibliometricanalysis