Cargando…

Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?

Etomidate is an induction agent known for its smooth intubating conditions and cardiovascular stability. Studies, however, have shown that a single dose of etomidate can result in a prolonged adrenal insufficiency. The impact of this in patients with sepsis has been a matter for debate. This review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flynn, Gordon, Shehabi, Yahya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22809235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11242
_version_ 1782260304276619264
author Flynn, Gordon
Shehabi, Yahya
author_facet Flynn, Gordon
Shehabi, Yahya
author_sort Flynn, Gordon
collection PubMed
description Etomidate is an induction agent known for its smooth intubating conditions and cardiovascular stability. Studies, however, have shown that a single dose of etomidate can result in a prolonged adrenal insufficiency. The impact of this in patients with sepsis has been a matter for debate. This review presents a pro/con case for using etomidate in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients and provides guidance for alternative induction techniques and when the use of etomidate might be justified despite these concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3580672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35806722013-07-19 Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? Flynn, Gordon Shehabi, Yahya Crit Care Review Etomidate is an induction agent known for its smooth intubating conditions and cardiovascular stability. Studies, however, have shown that a single dose of etomidate can result in a prolonged adrenal insufficiency. The impact of this in patients with sepsis has been a matter for debate. This review presents a pro/con case for using etomidate in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients and provides guidance for alternative induction techniques and when the use of etomidate might be justified despite these concerns. BioMed Central 2012 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3580672/ /pubmed/22809235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11242 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Flynn, Gordon
Shehabi, Yahya
Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
title Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
title_full Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
title_fullStr Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
title_full_unstemmed Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
title_short Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
title_sort pro/con debate: is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22809235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11242
work_keys_str_mv AT flynngordon procondebateisetomidatesafeinhemodynamicallyunstablecriticallyillpatients
AT shehabiyahya procondebateisetomidatesafeinhemodynamicallyunstablecriticallyillpatients