Cargando…
Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?
Etomidate is an induction agent known for its smooth intubating conditions and cardiovascular stability. Studies, however, have shown that a single dose of etomidate can result in a prolonged adrenal insufficiency. The impact of this in patients with sepsis has been a matter for debate. This review...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22809235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11242 |
_version_ | 1782260304276619264 |
---|---|
author | Flynn, Gordon Shehabi, Yahya |
author_facet | Flynn, Gordon Shehabi, Yahya |
author_sort | Flynn, Gordon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Etomidate is an induction agent known for its smooth intubating conditions and cardiovascular stability. Studies, however, have shown that a single dose of etomidate can result in a prolonged adrenal insufficiency. The impact of this in patients with sepsis has been a matter for debate. This review presents a pro/con case for using etomidate in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients and provides guidance for alternative induction techniques and when the use of etomidate might be justified despite these concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3580672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35806722013-07-19 Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? Flynn, Gordon Shehabi, Yahya Crit Care Review Etomidate is an induction agent known for its smooth intubating conditions and cardiovascular stability. Studies, however, have shown that a single dose of etomidate can result in a prolonged adrenal insufficiency. The impact of this in patients with sepsis has been a matter for debate. This review presents a pro/con case for using etomidate in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients and provides guidance for alternative induction techniques and when the use of etomidate might be justified despite these concerns. BioMed Central 2012 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3580672/ /pubmed/22809235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11242 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Flynn, Gordon Shehabi, Yahya Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? |
title | Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? |
title_full | Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? |
title_fullStr | Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? |
title_short | Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? |
title_sort | pro/con debate: is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22809235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flynngordon procondebateisetomidatesafeinhemodynamicallyunstablecriticallyillpatients AT shehabiyahya procondebateisetomidatesafeinhemodynamicallyunstablecriticallyillpatients |