Cargando…
The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a frequent form of acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients, and several detection tools for it have been developed for use in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The objective of this study is to evaluate the current evidence on the accuracy of the Confusion Assessmen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22759376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11407 |
_version_ | 1782260308475117568 |
---|---|
author | Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila Quarantini, Lucas C |
author_facet | Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila Quarantini, Lucas C |
author_sort | Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a frequent form of acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients, and several detection tools for it have been developed for use in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The objective of this study is to evaluate the current evidence on the accuracy of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium in critically ill patients. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify articles on the evaluation of the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC in ICU patients. A MEDLINE, SciELO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases search was performed for articles published in the English language, involving adult populations and comparing these diagnostic tools with the gold standard, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Results were summarized by meta-analysis. The QUADAS scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluating the CAM-ICU (including 969 patients) and four evaluating the ICDSC (n = 361 patients) were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity of the CAM-ICU was 80.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 77.1 to 82.6%), and the pooled specificity was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.8 to 96.8%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 103.2 (95% CI: 39.6 to 268.8). The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.97. The pooled sensitivity of the ICDSC was 74% (95% CI: 65.3 to 81.5%), and the pooled specificity was 81.9% (95% CI: 76.7 to 86.4%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 21.5 (95% CI: 8.51 to 54.4). The AUC was 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: The CAM-ICU is an excellent diagnostic tool in critically ill ICU patients, whereas the ICDSC has moderate sensitivity and good specificity. The available data suggest that both CAM-ICU and the ICDSC can be used as a screening tool for the diagnosis of delirium in critically ill patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3580690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35806902013-02-26 The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila Quarantini, Lucas C Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a frequent form of acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients, and several detection tools for it have been developed for use in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The objective of this study is to evaluate the current evidence on the accuracy of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium in critically ill patients. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify articles on the evaluation of the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC in ICU patients. A MEDLINE, SciELO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases search was performed for articles published in the English language, involving adult populations and comparing these diagnostic tools with the gold standard, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Results were summarized by meta-analysis. The QUADAS scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluating the CAM-ICU (including 969 patients) and four evaluating the ICDSC (n = 361 patients) were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity of the CAM-ICU was 80.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 77.1 to 82.6%), and the pooled specificity was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.8 to 96.8%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 103.2 (95% CI: 39.6 to 268.8). The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.97. The pooled sensitivity of the ICDSC was 74% (95% CI: 65.3 to 81.5%), and the pooled specificity was 81.9% (95% CI: 76.7 to 86.4%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 21.5 (95% CI: 8.51 to 54.4). The AUC was 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: The CAM-ICU is an excellent diagnostic tool in critically ill ICU patients, whereas the ICDSC has moderate sensitivity and good specificity. The available data suggest that both CAM-ICU and the ICDSC can be used as a screening tool for the diagnosis of delirium in critically ill patients. BioMed Central 2012 2012-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3580690/ /pubmed/22759376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11407 Text en Copyright ©2012 Gusmao-Flores et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila Quarantini, Lucas C The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
title | The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
title_full | The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
title_fullStr | The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
title_full_unstemmed | The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
title_short | The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
title_sort | confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (cam-icu) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (icdsc) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22759376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11407 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gusmaofloresdimitri theconfusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies AT salluhjorgeibrainfigueira theconfusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies AT chalhubricardoavila theconfusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies AT quarantinilucasc theconfusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies AT gusmaofloresdimitri confusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies AT salluhjorgeibrainfigueira confusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies AT chalhubricardoavila confusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies AT quarantinilucasc confusionassessmentmethodfortheintensivecareunitcamicuandintensivecaredeliriumscreeningchecklisticdscforthediagnosisofdeliriumasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalstudies |