Cargando…

Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical investigations of spinal motion preserving implants help in the understanding of their in vivo behavior. In this study, we hypothesized that the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) would exhibit decreased dynamic stiffness and more rapid ener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniels, Alan H., Paller, David J., Koruprolu, Sarath, Palumbo, Mark A., Crisco, Joseph J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3581457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057412
_version_ 1782260412738174976
author Daniels, Alan H.
Paller, David J.
Koruprolu, Sarath
Palumbo, Mark A.
Crisco, Joseph J.
author_facet Daniels, Alan H.
Paller, David J.
Koruprolu, Sarath
Palumbo, Mark A.
Crisco, Joseph J.
author_sort Daniels, Alan H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biomechanical investigations of spinal motion preserving implants help in the understanding of their in vivo behavior. In this study, we hypothesized that the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) would exhibit decreased dynamic stiffness and more rapid energy absorption compared to native functional spinal units under simulated physiologic motion when tested with the pendulum system. METHODS: Five unembalmed, frozen human lumbar functional spinal units were tested on the pendulum system with axial compressive loads of 181 N, 282 N, 385 N, and 488 N before and after Flexuspine total spinal segment replacement implantation. Testing in flexion, extension, and lateral bending began by rotating the pendulum to 5°; resulting in unconstrained oscillatory motion. The number of rotations to equilibrium was recorded and bending stiffness (N-m/°) was calculated and compared for each testing mode. RESULTS: The total spinal segment replacement reached equilibrium with significantly fewer cycles to equilibrium compared to the intact functional spinal unit at all loads in flexion (p<0.011), and at loads of 385 N and 488 N in lateral bending (p<0.020). Mean bending stiffness in flexion, extension, and lateral bending increased with increasing load for both the intact functional spinal unit and total spinal segment replacement constructs (p<0.001), with no significant differences in stiffness between the intact functional spinal unit and total spinal segment replacement in any of the test modes (p>0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar functional spinal units with implanted total spinal segment replacement were found to have similar dynamic bending stiffness, but absorbed energy at a more rapid rate than intact functional spinal units during cyclic loading with an unconstrained pendulum system. Although the effects on clinical performance of motion preserving devices is not fully known, these results provide further insight into the biomechanical behavior of this device under approximated physiologic loading conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3581457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35814572013-02-28 Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System Daniels, Alan H. Paller, David J. Koruprolu, Sarath Palumbo, Mark A. Crisco, Joseph J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Biomechanical investigations of spinal motion preserving implants help in the understanding of their in vivo behavior. In this study, we hypothesized that the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) would exhibit decreased dynamic stiffness and more rapid energy absorption compared to native functional spinal units under simulated physiologic motion when tested with the pendulum system. METHODS: Five unembalmed, frozen human lumbar functional spinal units were tested on the pendulum system with axial compressive loads of 181 N, 282 N, 385 N, and 488 N before and after Flexuspine total spinal segment replacement implantation. Testing in flexion, extension, and lateral bending began by rotating the pendulum to 5°; resulting in unconstrained oscillatory motion. The number of rotations to equilibrium was recorded and bending stiffness (N-m/°) was calculated and compared for each testing mode. RESULTS: The total spinal segment replacement reached equilibrium with significantly fewer cycles to equilibrium compared to the intact functional spinal unit at all loads in flexion (p<0.011), and at loads of 385 N and 488 N in lateral bending (p<0.020). Mean bending stiffness in flexion, extension, and lateral bending increased with increasing load for both the intact functional spinal unit and total spinal segment replacement constructs (p<0.001), with no significant differences in stiffness between the intact functional spinal unit and total spinal segment replacement in any of the test modes (p>0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar functional spinal units with implanted total spinal segment replacement were found to have similar dynamic bending stiffness, but absorbed energy at a more rapid rate than intact functional spinal units during cyclic loading with an unconstrained pendulum system. Although the effects on clinical performance of motion preserving devices is not fully known, these results provide further insight into the biomechanical behavior of this device under approximated physiologic loading conditions. Public Library of Science 2013-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3581457/ /pubmed/23451222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057412 Text en © 2013 Daniels et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Daniels, Alan H.
Paller, David J.
Koruprolu, Sarath
Palumbo, Mark A.
Crisco, Joseph J.
Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System
title Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System
title_full Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System
title_fullStr Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System
title_short Dynamic Biomechanical Examination of the Lumbar Spine with Implanted Total Spinal Segment Replacement (TSSR) Utilizing a Pendulum Testing System
title_sort dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (tssr) utilizing a pendulum testing system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3581457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057412
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsalanh dynamicbiomechanicalexaminationofthelumbarspinewithimplantedtotalspinalsegmentreplacementtssrutilizingapendulumtestingsystem
AT pallerdavidj dynamicbiomechanicalexaminationofthelumbarspinewithimplantedtotalspinalsegmentreplacementtssrutilizingapendulumtestingsystem
AT koruprolusarath dynamicbiomechanicalexaminationofthelumbarspinewithimplantedtotalspinalsegmentreplacementtssrutilizingapendulumtestingsystem
AT palumbomarka dynamicbiomechanicalexaminationofthelumbarspinewithimplantedtotalspinalsegmentreplacementtssrutilizingapendulumtestingsystem
AT criscojosephj dynamicbiomechanicalexaminationofthelumbarspinewithimplantedtotalspinalsegmentreplacementtssrutilizingapendulumtestingsystem