Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex process that may be influenced by many factors, including polymorphism in microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH). Previous work suggests an association between the Tyr113His and His139Arg mEH polymorphisms and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Jian-Hong, Xiang, Bang-De, Ma, Liang, You, Xue-Mei, Li, Le-Qun, Xie, Gui-Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3581564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057064
_version_ 1782260439736909824
author Zhong, Jian-Hong
Xiang, Bang-De
Ma, Liang
You, Xue-Mei
Li, Le-Qun
Xie, Gui-Sheng
author_facet Zhong, Jian-Hong
Xiang, Bang-De
Ma, Liang
You, Xue-Mei
Li, Le-Qun
Xie, Gui-Sheng
author_sort Zhong, Jian-Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex process that may be influenced by many factors, including polymorphism in microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH). Previous work suggests an association between the Tyr113His and His139Arg mEH polymorphisms and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results have been inconsistent. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between Tyr113His and His139Arg mEH polymorphism and susceptibility to HCC. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1,696 HCC cases and 3,600 controls. The 113His- mEH allele was significantly associated with increased risk of HCC based on allelic contrast (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04–1.75, p = 0.02), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07–2.54, p = 0.02) and a recessive genetic model (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.21–1.96, p<0.001), while individuals carrying the Arg139Arg mEH genotype had no association with increased or decreased risk of HCC. CONCLUSION: The 113His- allele polymorphism in mEH may be a risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis, while the mEH 139Arg- allele may not be a risk or protective factor. There is substantial evidence that mEH polymorphisms interact synergistically with other genes and the environment to modulate risk of HCC. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3581564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35815642013-02-28 Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Zhong, Jian-Hong Xiang, Bang-De Ma, Liang You, Xue-Mei Li, Le-Qun Xie, Gui-Sheng PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex process that may be influenced by many factors, including polymorphism in microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH). Previous work suggests an association between the Tyr113His and His139Arg mEH polymorphisms and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results have been inconsistent. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between Tyr113His and His139Arg mEH polymorphism and susceptibility to HCC. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1,696 HCC cases and 3,600 controls. The 113His- mEH allele was significantly associated with increased risk of HCC based on allelic contrast (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04–1.75, p = 0.02), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07–2.54, p = 0.02) and a recessive genetic model (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.21–1.96, p<0.001), while individuals carrying the Arg139Arg mEH genotype had no association with increased or decreased risk of HCC. CONCLUSION: The 113His- allele polymorphism in mEH may be a risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis, while the mEH 139Arg- allele may not be a risk or protective factor. There is substantial evidence that mEH polymorphisms interact synergistically with other genes and the environment to modulate risk of HCC. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm these conclusions. Public Library of Science 2013-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3581564/ /pubmed/23451147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057064 Text en © 2013 Zhong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhong, Jian-Hong
Xiang, Bang-De
Ma, Liang
You, Xue-Mei
Li, Le-Qun
Xie, Gui-Sheng
Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort meta-analysis of microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene polymorphism and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3581564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057064
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongjianhong metaanalysisofmicrosomalepoxidehydrolasegenepolymorphismandriskofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT xiangbangde metaanalysisofmicrosomalepoxidehydrolasegenepolymorphismandriskofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT maliang metaanalysisofmicrosomalepoxidehydrolasegenepolymorphismandriskofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT youxuemei metaanalysisofmicrosomalepoxidehydrolasegenepolymorphismandriskofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lilequn metaanalysisofmicrosomalepoxidehydrolasegenepolymorphismandriskofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT xieguisheng metaanalysisofmicrosomalepoxidehydrolasegenepolymorphismandriskofhepatocellularcarcinoma