Cargando…

Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities

BACKGROUND: The skeletal muscle mass is the largest organ in the healthy body, comprising 30–40 % of the body weight of an adult man. It confers protection from trauma, locomotion, ventilation, and it represents a “sink” in glucose metabolism and a reservoir of amino acids to other tissues such as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nedergaard, Anders, Karsdal, Morten A., Sun, Shu, Henriksen, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3581612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22996343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13539-012-0086-2
_version_ 1782260448769343488
author Nedergaard, Anders
Karsdal, Morten A.
Sun, Shu
Henriksen, Kim
author_facet Nedergaard, Anders
Karsdal, Morten A.
Sun, Shu
Henriksen, Kim
author_sort Nedergaard, Anders
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The skeletal muscle mass is the largest organ in the healthy body, comprising 30–40 % of the body weight of an adult man. It confers protection from trauma, locomotion, ventilation, and it represents a “sink” in glucose metabolism and a reservoir of amino acids to other tissues such as the brain and blood cells. Naturally, loss of muscle has dire consequences for health as well as functionality. Muscle loss is a natural consequence of especially aging, inactivity, and their associated metabolic dysfunction, but it is strongly accelerated in critical illness such as organ failure, sepsis, or cancer. Whether this muscle loss is considered a primary or secondary condition, it is known that muscle loss is a symptom that predicts morbidity and mortality and one that is known to impact quality of life and independence. Therefore, monitoring of muscle mass is relevant in a number of pathologies as well as in clinical trials as measures of efficacy as well as safety. METHODS AND RESULTS: Existing biomarkers of muscle mass or muscle loss have shown to be either too unreliable or too impractical in relation to the perceived clinical benefit to reach regular clinical research or use. We suggest serological neoepitope biomarkers as a possible technology to address some of these problems. Blood biomarkers of this kind have previously been shown to respond with high sensitivity and shorter time to minimum significant change than available biomarkers of muscle mass. We provide brief reviews of existing muscle mass or function biomarker technologies, muscle protein biology, and existing neoepitope biomarkers and proceed to present tentative recommendations on how to select and detect neoepitope biomarkers. CONCLUSION: We suggest that serological peptide biomarkers whose tissue and pathology specificity are derived from post-translational modification of proteins in tissues of interest, presenting so-called neoepitopes, represents an exciting candidate technology to fill out an empty niche in biomarker technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3581612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35816122013-03-01 Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities Nedergaard, Anders Karsdal, Morten A. Sun, Shu Henriksen, Kim J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Review BACKGROUND: The skeletal muscle mass is the largest organ in the healthy body, comprising 30–40 % of the body weight of an adult man. It confers protection from trauma, locomotion, ventilation, and it represents a “sink” in glucose metabolism and a reservoir of amino acids to other tissues such as the brain and blood cells. Naturally, loss of muscle has dire consequences for health as well as functionality. Muscle loss is a natural consequence of especially aging, inactivity, and their associated metabolic dysfunction, but it is strongly accelerated in critical illness such as organ failure, sepsis, or cancer. Whether this muscle loss is considered a primary or secondary condition, it is known that muscle loss is a symptom that predicts morbidity and mortality and one that is known to impact quality of life and independence. Therefore, monitoring of muscle mass is relevant in a number of pathologies as well as in clinical trials as measures of efficacy as well as safety. METHODS AND RESULTS: Existing biomarkers of muscle mass or muscle loss have shown to be either too unreliable or too impractical in relation to the perceived clinical benefit to reach regular clinical research or use. We suggest serological neoepitope biomarkers as a possible technology to address some of these problems. Blood biomarkers of this kind have previously been shown to respond with high sensitivity and shorter time to minimum significant change than available biomarkers of muscle mass. We provide brief reviews of existing muscle mass or function biomarker technologies, muscle protein biology, and existing neoepitope biomarkers and proceed to present tentative recommendations on how to select and detect neoepitope biomarkers. CONCLUSION: We suggest that serological peptide biomarkers whose tissue and pathology specificity are derived from post-translational modification of proteins in tissues of interest, presenting so-called neoepitopes, represents an exciting candidate technology to fill out an empty niche in biomarker technology. Springer-Verlag 2012-09-21 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3581612/ /pubmed/22996343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13539-012-0086-2 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2012
spellingShingle Review
Nedergaard, Anders
Karsdal, Morten A.
Sun, Shu
Henriksen, Kim
Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities
title Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities
title_full Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities
title_fullStr Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities
title_full_unstemmed Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities
title_short Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities
title_sort serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3581612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22996343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13539-012-0086-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nedergaardanders serologicalmusclelossbiomarkersanoverviewofcurrentconceptsandfuturepossibilities
AT karsdalmortena serologicalmusclelossbiomarkersanoverviewofcurrentconceptsandfuturepossibilities
AT sunshu serologicalmusclelossbiomarkersanoverviewofcurrentconceptsandfuturepossibilities
AT henriksenkim serologicalmusclelossbiomarkersanoverviewofcurrentconceptsandfuturepossibilities