Cargando…

Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations

The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence of two formulations of 40 mg pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets: Tripepsa as the test and Pantocid as the reference. The two products were administered as a single oral dose according to a randomized two-phase crossover with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamdi, Sandesh P., Palkar, Prashant J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23476803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/347457
_version_ 1782260531601604608
author Kamdi, Sandesh P.
Palkar, Prashant J.
author_facet Kamdi, Sandesh P.
Palkar, Prashant J.
author_sort Kamdi, Sandesh P.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence of two formulations of 40 mg pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets: Tripepsa as the test and Pantocid as the reference. The two products were administered as a single oral dose according to a randomized two-phase crossover with a 1-month washout period in 25 healthy Indian volunteers. After drug administration, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 30 hours. Plasma pantoprazole concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed based on noncompartmental analysis. The logarithmically transformed data of AUC(0−∞) and C (max) were analyzed for 90% confidence intervals (CI) using ANOVA. The mean (90% CI) values for the ratio of AUC(0−∞) and C (max) values of the test product over those of the reference product were 90.21 (83.69–97.24) and 108.68 (100.21–117.86), respectively (within the bioequivalence range of 80–125%). On the basis of pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0−∞), AUC(0−t), and C (max) values, both the formulations were bioequivalent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3582054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35820542013-03-09 Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations Kamdi, Sandesh P. Palkar, Prashant J. ISRN Pharmacol Research Article The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence of two formulations of 40 mg pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets: Tripepsa as the test and Pantocid as the reference. The two products were administered as a single oral dose according to a randomized two-phase crossover with a 1-month washout period in 25 healthy Indian volunteers. After drug administration, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 30 hours. Plasma pantoprazole concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed based on noncompartmental analysis. The logarithmically transformed data of AUC(0−∞) and C (max) were analyzed for 90% confidence intervals (CI) using ANOVA. The mean (90% CI) values for the ratio of AUC(0−∞) and C (max) values of the test product over those of the reference product were 90.21 (83.69–97.24) and 108.68 (100.21–117.86), respectively (within the bioequivalence range of 80–125%). On the basis of pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0−∞), AUC(0−t), and C (max) values, both the formulations were bioequivalent. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3582054/ /pubmed/23476803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/347457 Text en Copyright © 2013 S. P. Kamdi and P. J. Palkar. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kamdi, Sandesh P.
Palkar, Prashant J.
Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations
title Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations
title_full Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations
title_fullStr Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations
title_full_unstemmed Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations
title_short Bioequivalence Study of Pantoprazole Sodium-HPBCD and Conventional Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablet Formulations
title_sort bioequivalence study of pantoprazole sodium-hpbcd and conventional pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated tablet formulations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23476803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/347457
work_keys_str_mv AT kamdisandeshp bioequivalencestudyofpantoprazolesodiumhpbcdandconventionalpantoprazolesodiumentericcoatedtabletformulations
AT palkarprashantj bioequivalencestudyofpantoprazolesodiumhpbcdandconventionalpantoprazolesodiumentericcoatedtabletformulations