Cargando…

Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a widely used patient reported outcome in osteoarthritis. An important, but frequently overlooked, aspect of validating health outcome measures is to establish if items exhibit differential item functioning (DI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollard, Beth, Johnston, Marie, Dixon, Diane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23273389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-265
_version_ 1782260597251899392
author Pollard, Beth
Johnston, Marie
Dixon, Diane
author_facet Pollard, Beth
Johnston, Marie
Dixon, Diane
author_sort Pollard, Beth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a widely used patient reported outcome in osteoarthritis. An important, but frequently overlooked, aspect of validating health outcome measures is to establish if items exhibit differential item functioning (DIF). That is, if respondents have the same underlying level of an attribute, does the item give the same score in different subgroups or is it biased towards one subgroup or another. The aim of the study was to explore DIF in the Likert format WOMAC for the first time in a UK osteoarthritis population with respect to demographic, social, clinical and psychological factors. METHODS: The sample comprised a community sample of 763 people with osteoarthritis who participated in the Somerset and Avon Survey of Health. The WOMAC was explored for DIF by gender, age, social deprivation, social class, employment status, distress, body mass index and clinical factors. Ordinal regression models were used to identify DIF items. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, two items were identified for the physical functioning subscale as having DIF with age identified as the DIF factor for 2 items, gender for 1 item and body mass index for 1 item. For the WOMAC pain subscale, for people with hip osteoarthritis one item was identified with age-related DIF. The impact of the DIF items rarely had a significant effect on the conclusions of group comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the WOMAC performed well with only a small number of DIF items identified. However, as DIF items were identified in for the WOMAC physical functioning subscale it would be advisable to analyse data taking into account the possible impact of the DIF items when weight, gender or especially age effects, are the focus of interest in UK-based osteoarthritis studies. Similarly for the WOMAC pain subscale in people with hip osteoarthritis it would be worthwhile to analyse data taking into account the possible impact of the DIF item when age comparisons are of primary interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3582585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35825852013-02-27 Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pollard, Beth Johnston, Marie Dixon, Diane BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a widely used patient reported outcome in osteoarthritis. An important, but frequently overlooked, aspect of validating health outcome measures is to establish if items exhibit differential item functioning (DIF). That is, if respondents have the same underlying level of an attribute, does the item give the same score in different subgroups or is it biased towards one subgroup or another. The aim of the study was to explore DIF in the Likert format WOMAC for the first time in a UK osteoarthritis population with respect to demographic, social, clinical and psychological factors. METHODS: The sample comprised a community sample of 763 people with osteoarthritis who participated in the Somerset and Avon Survey of Health. The WOMAC was explored for DIF by gender, age, social deprivation, social class, employment status, distress, body mass index and clinical factors. Ordinal regression models were used to identify DIF items. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, two items were identified for the physical functioning subscale as having DIF with age identified as the DIF factor for 2 items, gender for 1 item and body mass index for 1 item. For the WOMAC pain subscale, for people with hip osteoarthritis one item was identified with age-related DIF. The impact of the DIF items rarely had a significant effect on the conclusions of group comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the WOMAC performed well with only a small number of DIF items identified. However, as DIF items were identified in for the WOMAC physical functioning subscale it would be advisable to analyse data taking into account the possible impact of the DIF items when weight, gender or especially age effects, are the focus of interest in UK-based osteoarthritis studies. Similarly for the WOMAC pain subscale in people with hip osteoarthritis it would be worthwhile to analyse data taking into account the possible impact of the DIF item when age comparisons are of primary interest. BioMed Central 2012-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3582585/ /pubmed/23273389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-265 Text en Copyright ©2012 Pollard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pollard, Beth
Johnston, Marie
Dixon, Diane
Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
title Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
title_full Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
title_fullStr Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
title_full_unstemmed Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
title_short Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
title_sort exploring differential item functioning in the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (womac)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23273389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-265
work_keys_str_mv AT pollardbeth exploringdifferentialitemfunctioninginthewesternontarioandmcmasteruniversitiesosteoarthritisindexwomac
AT johnstonmarie exploringdifferentialitemfunctioninginthewesternontarioandmcmasteruniversitiesosteoarthritisindexwomac
AT dixondiane exploringdifferentialitemfunctioninginthewesternontarioandmcmasteruniversitiesosteoarthritisindexwomac