Cargando…
Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability
BACKGROUND: Incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability is a very devastating event for the patient and the family. It is estimated that up to 25% of all traumatic spinal cord lesions belong to this category. The treatment for this type of spinal cord lesion is still subject of disc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-52 |
_version_ | 1782260598896066560 |
---|---|
author | Bartels, Ronald HMA Hosman, Allard JF van de Meent, Henk Hofmeijer, Jeannette Vos, Pieter E Slooff, Willem Bart Öner, F Cumhur Coppes, Maarten H Peul, Wilco C Verbeek, André LM |
author_facet | Bartels, Ronald HMA Hosman, Allard JF van de Meent, Henk Hofmeijer, Jeannette Vos, Pieter E Slooff, Willem Bart Öner, F Cumhur Coppes, Maarten H Peul, Wilco C Verbeek, André LM |
author_sort | Bartels, Ronald HMA |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability is a very devastating event for the patient and the family. It is estimated that up to 25% of all traumatic spinal cord lesions belong to this category. The treatment for this type of spinal cord lesion is still subject of discussion. From a biological point of view early surgery could prevent secondary damage due to ongoing compression of the already damaged spinal cord. Historically, however, conservative treatment was propagated with good clinical results. Proponents for early surgery as well those favoring conservative treatment are still in debate. The proposed trial will contribute to the discussion and hopefully also to a decrease in the variability of clinical practice. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the clinical outcome of early surgical strategy versus a conservative approach. The primary outcome is clinical outcome according to mJOA. This also measured by ASIA score, DASH score and SCIM III score. Other endpoints are duration of the stay at a high care department (medium care, intensive care), duration of the stay at the hospital, complication rate, mortality rate, sort of rehabilitation, and quality of life. A sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated to reach a power of 95%. The data will be analyzed as intention-to-treat at regular intervals, but the end evaluation will take place at two years post-injury. DISCUSSION: At the end of the study, clinical outcomes between treatments attitudes can be compared. Efficacy, but also efficiency can be determined. A goal of the study is to determine which treatment will result in the best quality of life for the patients. This study will certainly contribute to more uniformity of treatment offered to patients with a special sort of spinal cord injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Gov: NCT01367405 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3582592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35825922013-02-27 Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability Bartels, Ronald HMA Hosman, Allard JF van de Meent, Henk Hofmeijer, Jeannette Vos, Pieter E Slooff, Willem Bart Öner, F Cumhur Coppes, Maarten H Peul, Wilco C Verbeek, André LM BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability is a very devastating event for the patient and the family. It is estimated that up to 25% of all traumatic spinal cord lesions belong to this category. The treatment for this type of spinal cord lesion is still subject of discussion. From a biological point of view early surgery could prevent secondary damage due to ongoing compression of the already damaged spinal cord. Historically, however, conservative treatment was propagated with good clinical results. Proponents for early surgery as well those favoring conservative treatment are still in debate. The proposed trial will contribute to the discussion and hopefully also to a decrease in the variability of clinical practice. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the clinical outcome of early surgical strategy versus a conservative approach. The primary outcome is clinical outcome according to mJOA. This also measured by ASIA score, DASH score and SCIM III score. Other endpoints are duration of the stay at a high care department (medium care, intensive care), duration of the stay at the hospital, complication rate, mortality rate, sort of rehabilitation, and quality of life. A sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated to reach a power of 95%. The data will be analyzed as intention-to-treat at regular intervals, but the end evaluation will take place at two years post-injury. DISCUSSION: At the end of the study, clinical outcomes between treatments attitudes can be compared. Efficacy, but also efficiency can be determined. A goal of the study is to determine which treatment will result in the best quality of life for the patients. This study will certainly contribute to more uniformity of treatment offered to patients with a special sort of spinal cord injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Gov: NCT01367405 BioMed Central 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3582592/ /pubmed/23369169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-52 Text en Copyright ©2013 Bartels et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bartels, Ronald HMA Hosman, Allard JF van de Meent, Henk Hofmeijer, Jeannette Vos, Pieter E Slooff, Willem Bart Öner, F Cumhur Coppes, Maarten H Peul, Wilco C Verbeek, André LM Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability |
title | Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability |
title_full | Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability |
title_fullStr | Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability |
title_full_unstemmed | Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability |
title_short | Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability |
title_sort | design of cosmic: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-52 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartelsronaldhma designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT hosmanallardjf designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT vandemeenthenk designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT hofmeijerjeannette designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT vospietere designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT slooffwillembart designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT onerfcumhur designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT coppesmaartenh designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT peulwilcoc designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability AT verbeekandrelm designofcosmicarandomizedmulticentrecontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeorearlysurgicalmanagementofincompletecervicalcordsyndromewithoutspinalinstability |