Cargando…

Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings

BACKGROUND: Bacteria grown on semi-solid media can build two types of multicellular structures, depending on the circumstances. Bodies (colonies) arise when a single clone is grown axenically (germ-free), whereas multispecies chimeric consortia contain monoclonal microcolonies of participants. Growt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pátková, Irena, Čepl, Jaroslav J, Rieger, Tomáš, Blahůšková, Anna, Neubauer, Zdeněk, Markoš, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3583141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22894147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-178
_version_ 1782260670179311616
author Pátková, Irena
Čepl, Jaroslav J
Rieger, Tomáš
Blahůšková, Anna
Neubauer, Zdeněk
Markoš, Anton
author_facet Pátková, Irena
Čepl, Jaroslav J
Rieger, Tomáš
Blahůšková, Anna
Neubauer, Zdeněk
Markoš, Anton
author_sort Pátková, Irena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacteria grown on semi-solid media can build two types of multicellular structures, depending on the circumstances. Bodies (colonies) arise when a single clone is grown axenically (germ-free), whereas multispecies chimeric consortia contain monoclonal microcolonies of participants. Growth of an axenic colony, mutual interactions of colonies, and negotiation of the morphospace in consortial ecosystems are results of intricate regulatory and metabolic networks. Multicellular structures developed by Serratia sp. are characteristically shaped and colored, forming patterns that reflect their growth conditions (in particular medium composition and the presence of other bacteria). RESULTS: Building on our previous work, we developed a model system for studying ontogeny of multicellular bacterial structures formed by five Serratia sp. morphotypes of two species grown in either "germ-free" or "gnotobiotic" settings (i.e. in the presence of bacteria of other conspecific morphotype, other Serratia species, or E. coli). Monoclonal bodies show regular and reproducible macroscopic appearance of the colony, as well as microscopic pattern of its growing margin. Standard development can be modified in a characteristic and reproducible manner in close vicinity of other bacterial structures (or in the presence of their products). Encounters of colonies with neighbors of a different morphotype or species reveal relationships of dominance, cooperation, or submission; multiple interactions can be summarized in "rock – paper – scissors" network of interrelationships. Chimerical (mixed) plantings consisting of two morphotypes usually produced a “consortium” whose structure is consistent with the model derived from interaction patterns observed in colonies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that development of a bacterial colony can be considered analogous to embryogenesis in animals, plants, or fungi: to proceed, early stages require thorough insulation from the rest of the biosphere. Only later, the newly developing body gets connected to the ecological interactions in the biosphere. Mixed “anlagen” cannot accomplish the first, germ-free phase of development; hence, they will result in the consortium of small colonies. To map early development and subsequent interactions with the rest of the biospheric web, simplified gnotobiotic systems described here may turn to be of general use, complementing similar studies on developing multicellular eukaryots under germ-free or gnotobiotic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3583141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35831412013-02-28 Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings Pátková, Irena Čepl, Jaroslav J Rieger, Tomáš Blahůšková, Anna Neubauer, Zdeněk Markoš, Anton BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Bacteria grown on semi-solid media can build two types of multicellular structures, depending on the circumstances. Bodies (colonies) arise when a single clone is grown axenically (germ-free), whereas multispecies chimeric consortia contain monoclonal microcolonies of participants. Growth of an axenic colony, mutual interactions of colonies, and negotiation of the morphospace in consortial ecosystems are results of intricate regulatory and metabolic networks. Multicellular structures developed by Serratia sp. are characteristically shaped and colored, forming patterns that reflect their growth conditions (in particular medium composition and the presence of other bacteria). RESULTS: Building on our previous work, we developed a model system for studying ontogeny of multicellular bacterial structures formed by five Serratia sp. morphotypes of two species grown in either "germ-free" or "gnotobiotic" settings (i.e. in the presence of bacteria of other conspecific morphotype, other Serratia species, or E. coli). Monoclonal bodies show regular and reproducible macroscopic appearance of the colony, as well as microscopic pattern of its growing margin. Standard development can be modified in a characteristic and reproducible manner in close vicinity of other bacterial structures (or in the presence of their products). Encounters of colonies with neighbors of a different morphotype or species reveal relationships of dominance, cooperation, or submission; multiple interactions can be summarized in "rock – paper – scissors" network of interrelationships. Chimerical (mixed) plantings consisting of two morphotypes usually produced a “consortium” whose structure is consistent with the model derived from interaction patterns observed in colonies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that development of a bacterial colony can be considered analogous to embryogenesis in animals, plants, or fungi: to proceed, early stages require thorough insulation from the rest of the biosphere. Only later, the newly developing body gets connected to the ecological interactions in the biosphere. Mixed “anlagen” cannot accomplish the first, germ-free phase of development; hence, they will result in the consortium of small colonies. To map early development and subsequent interactions with the rest of the biospheric web, simplified gnotobiotic systems described here may turn to be of general use, complementing similar studies on developing multicellular eukaryots under germ-free or gnotobiotic conditions. BioMed Central 2012-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3583141/ /pubmed/22894147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-178 Text en Copyright © 2012 Pátková et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pátková, Irena
Čepl, Jaroslav J
Rieger, Tomáš
Blahůšková, Anna
Neubauer, Zdeněk
Markoš, Anton
Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings
title Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings
title_full Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings
title_fullStr Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings
title_full_unstemmed Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings
title_short Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings
title_sort developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3583141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22894147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-178
work_keys_str_mv AT patkovairena developmentalplasticityofbacterialcoloniesandconsortiaingermfreeandgnotobioticsettings
AT cepljaroslavj developmentalplasticityofbacterialcoloniesandconsortiaingermfreeandgnotobioticsettings
AT riegertomas developmentalplasticityofbacterialcoloniesandconsortiaingermfreeandgnotobioticsettings
AT blahuskovaanna developmentalplasticityofbacterialcoloniesandconsortiaingermfreeandgnotobioticsettings
AT neubauerzdenek developmentalplasticityofbacterialcoloniesandconsortiaingermfreeandgnotobioticsettings
AT markosanton developmentalplasticityofbacterialcoloniesandconsortiaingermfreeandgnotobioticsettings