Cargando…

Perceptions of Emergency Department Crowding in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Introduction: The state of emergency department (ED) crowding in Pennsylvania has not previously been reported. Methods: We assessed perceptions of ED crowding by surveying medical directors/chairs from Pennsylvania EDs in the spring of 2008. Results: A total of 106 completed the questionnaire (68%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pines, Jesse M., Isserman, Joshua A., Kelly, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3583278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451289
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.5.6700
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: The state of emergency department (ED) crowding in Pennsylvania has not previously been reported. Methods: We assessed perceptions of ED crowding by surveying medical directors/chairs from Pennsylvania EDs in the spring of 2008. Results: A total of 106 completed the questionnaire (68% response rate). A total of 83% (86/104) agreed that ED crowding was a problem; 26% (27/105) reported that at least half of admitted patients boarded for more than 4 hours. Ninety-eight percent (102/104) agreed that patient satisfaction suffers during crowding and 79% (84/106) stated that quality suffers. Sixty-five percent (68/105) reported that crowding had worsened during the past 2 years. Several hospital interventions were used to alleviate crowding: expediting discharges, 81% (86/106); prioritizing ED patients for inpatient beds, 79% (84/106); and ambulance diversion, 55% (57/105). Almost all respondents who had improved ED operations reported that it had reduced crowding. Conclusion: ED crowding is a common problem in Pennsylvania and is worsening in the majority of hospitals, despite the implementation of a variety of interventions.