Cargando…
Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis
Objective To compare the cost effectiveness of the three most commonly chosen types of prosthesis for total hip replacement. Design Lifetime cost effectiveness model with parameters estimated from individual patient data obtained from three large national databases. Setting English National Health S...
Autores principales: | Pennington, Mark, Grieve, Richard, Sekhon, Jasjeet S, Gregg, Paul, Black, Nick, van der Meulen, Jan H |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3583598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23447338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1026 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Medium-term Outcomes of Cemented Prostheses and Cementless Modular Prostheses in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
por: Wang, Long, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Functional Outcome, Revision Rates and Mortality after Primary Total Hip Replacement – A National Comparison of Nine Prosthesis Brands in England
por: Pennington, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Total hip replacement: A meta-analysis to evaluate survival of cemented, cementless and hybrid implants
por: Phedy, Phedy, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Cost-Effectiveness of Five Commonly Used Prosthesis Brands for Total Knee Replacement in the UK: A Study Using the NJR Dataset
por: Pennington, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Cementless Hydroxyapatite Coated Hip Prostheses
por: Herrera, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)