Cargando…

A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer

Individualized approaches to prognosis are crucial to effective management of cancer patients. We developed a methodology to assign individualized 5-year disease-specific death probabilities to 1,222 patients with melanoma and to 1,225 patients with breast cancer. For each cancer, three risk subgrou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed, Sagebiel, Richard W., Joensuu, Heikki, Miller, James R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23460802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056435
_version_ 1782260976070950912
author Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
Sagebiel, Richard W.
Joensuu, Heikki
Miller, James R.
author_facet Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
Sagebiel, Richard W.
Joensuu, Heikki
Miller, James R.
author_sort Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description Individualized approaches to prognosis are crucial to effective management of cancer patients. We developed a methodology to assign individualized 5-year disease-specific death probabilities to 1,222 patients with melanoma and to 1,225 patients with breast cancer. For each cancer, three risk subgroups were identified by stratifying patients according to initial stage, and prediction probabilities were generated based on the factors most closely related to 5-year disease-specific death. Separate subgroup probabilities were merged to form a single composite index, and its predictive efficacy was assessed by several measures, including the area (AUC) under its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The patient-centered methodology achieved an AUC of 0.867 in the prediction of 5-year disease-specific death, compared with 0.787 using the AJCC staging classification alone. When applied to breast cancer patients, it achieved an AUC of 0.907, compared with 0.802 using the AJCC staging classification alone. A prognostic algorithm produced from a randomly selected training subsample of 800 melanoma patients preserved 92.5% of its prognostic efficacy (as measured by AUC) when the same algorithm was applied to a validation subsample containing the remaining patients. Finally, the tailored prognostic approach enhanced the identification of high-risk candidates for adjuvant therapy in melanoma. These results describe a novel patient-centered prognostic methodology with improved predictive efficacy when compared with AJCC stage alone in two distinct malignancies drawn from two separate populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3584071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35840712013-03-04 A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed Sagebiel, Richard W. Joensuu, Heikki Miller, James R. PLoS One Research Article Individualized approaches to prognosis are crucial to effective management of cancer patients. We developed a methodology to assign individualized 5-year disease-specific death probabilities to 1,222 patients with melanoma and to 1,225 patients with breast cancer. For each cancer, three risk subgroups were identified by stratifying patients according to initial stage, and prediction probabilities were generated based on the factors most closely related to 5-year disease-specific death. Separate subgroup probabilities were merged to form a single composite index, and its predictive efficacy was assessed by several measures, including the area (AUC) under its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The patient-centered methodology achieved an AUC of 0.867 in the prediction of 5-year disease-specific death, compared with 0.787 using the AJCC staging classification alone. When applied to breast cancer patients, it achieved an AUC of 0.907, compared with 0.802 using the AJCC staging classification alone. A prognostic algorithm produced from a randomly selected training subsample of 800 melanoma patients preserved 92.5% of its prognostic efficacy (as measured by AUC) when the same algorithm was applied to a validation subsample containing the remaining patients. Finally, the tailored prognostic approach enhanced the identification of high-risk candidates for adjuvant therapy in melanoma. These results describe a novel patient-centered prognostic methodology with improved predictive efficacy when compared with AJCC stage alone in two distinct malignancies drawn from two separate populations. Public Library of Science 2013-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3584071/ /pubmed/23460802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056435 Text en © 2013 Kashani-Sabet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
Sagebiel, Richard W.
Joensuu, Heikki
Miller, James R.
A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer
title A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer
title_full A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer
title_fullStr A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer
title_short A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer
title_sort patient-centered methodology that improves the accuracy of prognostic predictions in cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23460802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056435
work_keys_str_mv AT kashanisabetmohammed apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer
AT sagebielrichardw apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer
AT joensuuheikki apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer
AT millerjamesr apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer
AT kashanisabetmohammed patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer
AT sagebielrichardw patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer
AT joensuuheikki patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer
AT millerjamesr patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer