Cargando…
A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer
Individualized approaches to prognosis are crucial to effective management of cancer patients. We developed a methodology to assign individualized 5-year disease-specific death probabilities to 1,222 patients with melanoma and to 1,225 patients with breast cancer. For each cancer, three risk subgrou...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23460802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056435 |
_version_ | 1782260976070950912 |
---|---|
author | Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed Sagebiel, Richard W. Joensuu, Heikki Miller, James R. |
author_facet | Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed Sagebiel, Richard W. Joensuu, Heikki Miller, James R. |
author_sort | Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individualized approaches to prognosis are crucial to effective management of cancer patients. We developed a methodology to assign individualized 5-year disease-specific death probabilities to 1,222 patients with melanoma and to 1,225 patients with breast cancer. For each cancer, three risk subgroups were identified by stratifying patients according to initial stage, and prediction probabilities were generated based on the factors most closely related to 5-year disease-specific death. Separate subgroup probabilities were merged to form a single composite index, and its predictive efficacy was assessed by several measures, including the area (AUC) under its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The patient-centered methodology achieved an AUC of 0.867 in the prediction of 5-year disease-specific death, compared with 0.787 using the AJCC staging classification alone. When applied to breast cancer patients, it achieved an AUC of 0.907, compared with 0.802 using the AJCC staging classification alone. A prognostic algorithm produced from a randomly selected training subsample of 800 melanoma patients preserved 92.5% of its prognostic efficacy (as measured by AUC) when the same algorithm was applied to a validation subsample containing the remaining patients. Finally, the tailored prognostic approach enhanced the identification of high-risk candidates for adjuvant therapy in melanoma. These results describe a novel patient-centered prognostic methodology with improved predictive efficacy when compared with AJCC stage alone in two distinct malignancies drawn from two separate populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3584071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35840712013-03-04 A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed Sagebiel, Richard W. Joensuu, Heikki Miller, James R. PLoS One Research Article Individualized approaches to prognosis are crucial to effective management of cancer patients. We developed a methodology to assign individualized 5-year disease-specific death probabilities to 1,222 patients with melanoma and to 1,225 patients with breast cancer. For each cancer, three risk subgroups were identified by stratifying patients according to initial stage, and prediction probabilities were generated based on the factors most closely related to 5-year disease-specific death. Separate subgroup probabilities were merged to form a single composite index, and its predictive efficacy was assessed by several measures, including the area (AUC) under its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The patient-centered methodology achieved an AUC of 0.867 in the prediction of 5-year disease-specific death, compared with 0.787 using the AJCC staging classification alone. When applied to breast cancer patients, it achieved an AUC of 0.907, compared with 0.802 using the AJCC staging classification alone. A prognostic algorithm produced from a randomly selected training subsample of 800 melanoma patients preserved 92.5% of its prognostic efficacy (as measured by AUC) when the same algorithm was applied to a validation subsample containing the remaining patients. Finally, the tailored prognostic approach enhanced the identification of high-risk candidates for adjuvant therapy in melanoma. These results describe a novel patient-centered prognostic methodology with improved predictive efficacy when compared with AJCC stage alone in two distinct malignancies drawn from two separate populations. Public Library of Science 2013-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3584071/ /pubmed/23460802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056435 Text en © 2013 Kashani-Sabet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed Sagebiel, Richard W. Joensuu, Heikki Miller, James R. A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer |
title | A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer |
title_full | A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer |
title_fullStr | A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer |
title_short | A Patient-Centered Methodology That Improves the Accuracy of Prognostic Predictions in Cancer |
title_sort | patient-centered methodology that improves the accuracy of prognostic predictions in cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23460802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kashanisabetmohammed apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer AT sagebielrichardw apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer AT joensuuheikki apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer AT millerjamesr apatientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer AT kashanisabetmohammed patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer AT sagebielrichardw patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer AT joensuuheikki patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer AT millerjamesr patientcenteredmethodologythatimprovestheaccuracyofprognosticpredictionsincancer |