Cargando…

Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers

Discrimination among viable/active or dead/inactive cells in a microbial community is a vital question to address issues on ecological microbiology or microbiological quality control. It is commonly assumed that metabolically active cells (ChemchromeV6 [CV6] procedure) correspond to viable cells (di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ducret, Adrien, Dukan, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23281341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.62
_version_ 1782260997700976640
author Ducret, Adrien
Dukan, Sam
author_facet Ducret, Adrien
Dukan, Sam
author_sort Ducret, Adrien
collection PubMed
description Discrimination among viable/active or dead/inactive cells in a microbial community is a vital question to address issues on ecological microbiology or microbiological quality control. It is commonly assumed that metabolically active cells (ChemchromeV6 [CV6] procedure) correspond to viable cells (direct viable count procedure [DVC]), although this assumption has never been demonstrated and is therefore a matter of debate. Indeed, simultaneous determination of cell viability and metabolic activity has never been performed on the same cells. Here, we developed a microfluidic device to investigate the viability and the metabolic activity of Escherichia coli cells at single-cell level. Cells were immobilized in a flow chamber in which different solutions were sequentially injected according to different scenarios. By using time-lapse microscopy combined with automated tracking procedures, we first successfully assessed the ability of cells to divide and their metabolic activity at single-cell level. Applying these two procedures on the same cells after a hypochlorous acid (HOCl) treatment, we showed that the ability of cells to divide and their metabolic activity were anticorrelated. These results indicate that the relation between CV6 uptake and cell viability may be partially incorrect. Care must be taken in using the terms “CV6-positive” and “viable” synonymously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3584218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35842182013-03-07 Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers Ducret, Adrien Dukan, Sam Microbiologyopen Original Research Discrimination among viable/active or dead/inactive cells in a microbial community is a vital question to address issues on ecological microbiology or microbiological quality control. It is commonly assumed that metabolically active cells (ChemchromeV6 [CV6] procedure) correspond to viable cells (direct viable count procedure [DVC]), although this assumption has never been demonstrated and is therefore a matter of debate. Indeed, simultaneous determination of cell viability and metabolic activity has never been performed on the same cells. Here, we developed a microfluidic device to investigate the viability and the metabolic activity of Escherichia coli cells at single-cell level. Cells were immobilized in a flow chamber in which different solutions were sequentially injected according to different scenarios. By using time-lapse microscopy combined with automated tracking procedures, we first successfully assessed the ability of cells to divide and their metabolic activity at single-cell level. Applying these two procedures on the same cells after a hypochlorous acid (HOCl) treatment, we showed that the ability of cells to divide and their metabolic activity were anticorrelated. These results indicate that the relation between CV6 uptake and cell viability may be partially incorrect. Care must be taken in using the terms “CV6-positive” and “viable” synonymously. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-02 2012-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3584218/ /pubmed/23281341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.62 Text en Copyright © 2012 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ducret, Adrien
Dukan, Sam
Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers
title Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers
title_full Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers
title_fullStr Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers
title_full_unstemmed Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers
title_short Single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers
title_sort single-cell analysis of cell viability after a biocide treatment unveils an absence of positive correlation between two commonly used viability markers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23281341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.62
work_keys_str_mv AT ducretadrien singlecellanalysisofcellviabilityafterabiocidetreatmentunveilsanabsenceofpositivecorrelationbetweentwocommonlyusedviabilitymarkers
AT dukansam singlecellanalysisofcellviabilityafterabiocidetreatmentunveilsanabsenceofpositivecorrelationbetweentwocommonlyusedviabilitymarkers