Cargando…
Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an incr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23525326 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(02)R01 |
_version_ | 1782261004359434240 |
---|---|
author | Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli de Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa |
author_facet | Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli de Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa |
author_sort | Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli |
collection | PubMed |
description | Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how “weak” sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from “stronger” sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3584266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35842662013-03-01 Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli de Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how “weak” sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from “stronger” sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3584266/ /pubmed/23525326 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(02)R01 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli de Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title | Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_full | Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_fullStr | Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_full_unstemmed | Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_short | Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_sort | muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23525326 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(02)R01 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minozzofabiocarderelli muscleresidualforceenhancementabriefreview AT deliraclaudioandrebarbosa muscleresidualforceenhancementabriefreview |