Cargando…

Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about the effect of the learning curve for different types of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We investigated the prostheses survival of THAs just after the implementation of a model new to the hospital, and compared these results with the results of THAs don...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peltola, Mikko, Malmivaara, Antti, Paavola, Mika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23368748
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.771299
_version_ 1782261043536330752
author Peltola, Mikko
Malmivaara, Antti
Paavola, Mika
author_facet Peltola, Mikko
Malmivaara, Antti
Paavola, Mika
author_sort Peltola, Mikko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about the effect of the learning curve for different types of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We investigated the prostheses survival of THAs just after the implementation of a model new to the hospital, and compared these results with the results of THAs done when more than 100 implantations had been undertaken. In addition, we investigated whether differences exist between different types of femoral stems and acetabular cups at the early implementation phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used comprehensive registry data from all units (n = 76) that performed THAs for primary osteoarthritis in Finland between 1998 and 2007. Complete data including follow-up data to December 31, 2010 or until death were available for 33,819 patients (39,125 THAs). The stems and cups used were given order numbers in each hospital and classified into 5 groups: operations with order number (a) 1–15, (b) 16–30, (c) 31–50, (d) 51–100, and (e) > 100. We used Cox’s proportional hazards modeling for calculation of the adjusted hazard ratios for the risk of revision during the 3 years following the implementation of a new THA endoprosthesis type in the groups. RESULTS: Introduction of new endoprosthesis types was common, as more than 1 in 7 patients received a type that had been previously used in 15 or less operations. For the first 15 operations after a stem or cup type was introduced, there was an elevated risk of revision (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1–1.5). There were differences in the risk of early revision between stem and cup types at implementation. INTERPRETATION: The first 15 operations with a new stem or cup model had an increased risk of early revision surgery. Stems and cups differed in their early revision risk, particularly at the implementation phase. Thus, the risk of early revision at the implementation phase should be considered when a new type of THA is brought into use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3584598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35845982013-03-07 Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations Peltola, Mikko Malmivaara, Antti Paavola, Mika Acta Orthop Register Studies BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about the effect of the learning curve for different types of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We investigated the prostheses survival of THAs just after the implementation of a model new to the hospital, and compared these results with the results of THAs done when more than 100 implantations had been undertaken. In addition, we investigated whether differences exist between different types of femoral stems and acetabular cups at the early implementation phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used comprehensive registry data from all units (n = 76) that performed THAs for primary osteoarthritis in Finland between 1998 and 2007. Complete data including follow-up data to December 31, 2010 or until death were available for 33,819 patients (39,125 THAs). The stems and cups used were given order numbers in each hospital and classified into 5 groups: operations with order number (a) 1–15, (b) 16–30, (c) 31–50, (d) 51–100, and (e) > 100. We used Cox’s proportional hazards modeling for calculation of the adjusted hazard ratios for the risk of revision during the 3 years following the implementation of a new THA endoprosthesis type in the groups. RESULTS: Introduction of new endoprosthesis types was common, as more than 1 in 7 patients received a type that had been previously used in 15 or less operations. For the first 15 operations after a stem or cup type was introduced, there was an elevated risk of revision (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1–1.5). There were differences in the risk of early revision between stem and cup types at implementation. INTERPRETATION: The first 15 operations with a new stem or cup model had an increased risk of early revision surgery. Stems and cups differed in their early revision risk, particularly at the implementation phase. Thus, the risk of early revision at the implementation phase should be considered when a new type of THA is brought into use. Informa Healthcare 2013-02 2013-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3584598/ /pubmed/23368748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.771299 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Register Studies
Peltola, Mikko
Malmivaara, Antti
Paavola, Mika
Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations
title Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations
title_full Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations
title_fullStr Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations
title_full_unstemmed Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations
title_short Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations
title_sort hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk: a nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations
topic Register Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23368748
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.771299
work_keys_str_mv AT peltolamikko hipprosthesisintroductionandearlyrevisionriskanationwidepopulationbasedstudycovering39125operations
AT malmivaaraantti hipprosthesisintroductionandearlyrevisionriskanationwidepopulationbasedstudycovering39125operations
AT paavolamika hipprosthesisintroductionandearlyrevisionriskanationwidepopulationbasedstudycovering39125operations