Cargando…

Protocols in the management of critical illness

Care of the critically ill patient is becoming increasingly complex. Protocols, which standardize care of patients with similar diseases, represent a potential solution to managing multiple simultaneous problems in critically ill patients. In this article, we examine the advantages and disadvantages...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Steven Y, Sevransky, Jon, Martin, Greg S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10578
_version_ 1782261056634093568
author Chang, Steven Y
Sevransky, Jon
Martin, Greg S
author_facet Chang, Steven Y
Sevransky, Jon
Martin, Greg S
author_sort Chang, Steven Y
collection PubMed
description Care of the critically ill patient is becoming increasingly complex. Protocols, which standardize care of patients with similar diseases, represent a potential solution to managing multiple simultaneous problems in critically ill patients. In this article, we examine the advantages and disadvantages to care protocolization, and posit that careful and thoughtful implementation of protocols is likely to benefit patients. We also discuss the potential for unintended consequences, and even harm, with protocolization in critically ill patients using the Critical Illness Outcomes Study as a model to examine the effects of protocolization in large populations of intensive care patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3584719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35847192013-03-16 Protocols in the management of critical illness Chang, Steven Y Sevransky, Jon Martin, Greg S Crit Care Viewpoint Care of the critically ill patient is becoming increasingly complex. Protocols, which standardize care of patients with similar diseases, represent a potential solution to managing multiple simultaneous problems in critically ill patients. In this article, we examine the advantages and disadvantages to care protocolization, and posit that careful and thoughtful implementation of protocols is likely to benefit patients. We also discuss the potential for unintended consequences, and even harm, with protocolization in critically ill patients using the Critical Illness Outcomes Study as a model to examine the effects of protocolization in large populations of intensive care patients. BioMed Central 2012 2012-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3584719/ /pubmed/22424130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10578 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Chang, Steven Y
Sevransky, Jon
Martin, Greg S
Protocols in the management of critical illness
title Protocols in the management of critical illness
title_full Protocols in the management of critical illness
title_fullStr Protocols in the management of critical illness
title_full_unstemmed Protocols in the management of critical illness
title_short Protocols in the management of critical illness
title_sort protocols in the management of critical illness
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10578
work_keys_str_mv AT changsteveny protocolsinthemanagementofcriticalillness
AT sevranskyjon protocolsinthemanagementofcriticalillness
AT martingregs protocolsinthemanagementofcriticalillness