Cargando…
Protocols in the management of critical illness
Care of the critically ill patient is becoming increasingly complex. Protocols, which standardize care of patients with similar diseases, represent a potential solution to managing multiple simultaneous problems in critically ill patients. In this article, we examine the advantages and disadvantages...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10578 |
_version_ | 1782261056634093568 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Steven Y Sevransky, Jon Martin, Greg S |
author_facet | Chang, Steven Y Sevransky, Jon Martin, Greg S |
author_sort | Chang, Steven Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | Care of the critically ill patient is becoming increasingly complex. Protocols, which standardize care of patients with similar diseases, represent a potential solution to managing multiple simultaneous problems in critically ill patients. In this article, we examine the advantages and disadvantages to care protocolization, and posit that careful and thoughtful implementation of protocols is likely to benefit patients. We also discuss the potential for unintended consequences, and even harm, with protocolization in critically ill patients using the Critical Illness Outcomes Study as a model to examine the effects of protocolization in large populations of intensive care patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3584719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35847192013-03-16 Protocols in the management of critical illness Chang, Steven Y Sevransky, Jon Martin, Greg S Crit Care Viewpoint Care of the critically ill patient is becoming increasingly complex. Protocols, which standardize care of patients with similar diseases, represent a potential solution to managing multiple simultaneous problems in critically ill patients. In this article, we examine the advantages and disadvantages to care protocolization, and posit that careful and thoughtful implementation of protocols is likely to benefit patients. We also discuss the potential for unintended consequences, and even harm, with protocolization in critically ill patients using the Critical Illness Outcomes Study as a model to examine the effects of protocolization in large populations of intensive care patients. BioMed Central 2012 2012-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3584719/ /pubmed/22424130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10578 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Chang, Steven Y Sevransky, Jon Martin, Greg S Protocols in the management of critical illness |
title | Protocols in the management of critical illness |
title_full | Protocols in the management of critical illness |
title_fullStr | Protocols in the management of critical illness |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocols in the management of critical illness |
title_short | Protocols in the management of critical illness |
title_sort | protocols in the management of critical illness |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10578 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changsteveny protocolsinthemanagementofcriticalillness AT sevranskyjon protocolsinthemanagementofcriticalillness AT martingregs protocolsinthemanagementofcriticalillness |