Cargando…

Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10)

Although the temperature response of soil respiration (R(s)) has been studied extensively, several issues remain unresolved, including hysteresis in the R(s)–temperature relationship and differences in the long- vs. short-term R(s) sensitivity to temperature. Progress on these issues will contribute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Xin, Zha, Tianshan, Wu, Bin, Zhang, Yuqing, Chen, Wenjing, Wang, Xiaoping, Yu, Haiqun, He, Guimei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057858
_version_ 1782261102637219840
author Jia, Xin
Zha, Tianshan
Wu, Bin
Zhang, Yuqing
Chen, Wenjing
Wang, Xiaoping
Yu, Haiqun
He, Guimei
author_facet Jia, Xin
Zha, Tianshan
Wu, Bin
Zhang, Yuqing
Chen, Wenjing
Wang, Xiaoping
Yu, Haiqun
He, Guimei
author_sort Jia, Xin
collection PubMed
description Although the temperature response of soil respiration (R(s)) has been studied extensively, several issues remain unresolved, including hysteresis in the R(s)–temperature relationship and differences in the long- vs. short-term R(s) sensitivity to temperature. Progress on these issues will contribute to reduced uncertainties in carbon cycle modeling. We monitored soil CO(2) efflux with an automated chamber system in a Pinus tabulaeformis plantation near Beijing throughout 2011. Soil temperature at 10-cm depth (T(s)) exerted a strong control over R(s), with the annual temperature sensitivity (Q (10)) and basal rate at 10°C (R(s) (10)) being 2.76 and 1.40 µmol m(−2) s(−1), respectively. Both R(s) and short-term (i.e., daily) estimates of R(s) (10) showed pronounced seasonal hysteresis with respect to T(s), with the efflux in the second half of the year being larger than that early in the season for a given temperature. The hysteresis may be associated with the confounding effects of microbial population dynamics and/or litter input. As a result, all of the applied regression models failed to yield unbiased estimates of R(s) over the entire annual cycle. Lags between R(s) and T(s) were observed at the diel scale in the early and late growing season, but not in summer. The seasonality in these lags may be due to the use of a single T(s) measurement depth, which failed to represent seasonal changes in the depth of CO(2) production. Daily estimates of Q (10) averaged 2.04, smaller than the value obtained from the seasonal relationship. In addition, daily Q (10) decreased with increasing T(s), which may contribute feedback to the climate system under global warming scenarios. The use of a fixed, universal Q (10) is considered adequate when modeling annual carbon budgets across large spatial extents. In contrast, a seasonally-varying, environmentally-controlled Q (10) should be used when short-term accuracy is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3585128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35851282013-03-06 Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10) Jia, Xin Zha, Tianshan Wu, Bin Zhang, Yuqing Chen, Wenjing Wang, Xiaoping Yu, Haiqun He, Guimei PLoS One Research Article Although the temperature response of soil respiration (R(s)) has been studied extensively, several issues remain unresolved, including hysteresis in the R(s)–temperature relationship and differences in the long- vs. short-term R(s) sensitivity to temperature. Progress on these issues will contribute to reduced uncertainties in carbon cycle modeling. We monitored soil CO(2) efflux with an automated chamber system in a Pinus tabulaeformis plantation near Beijing throughout 2011. Soil temperature at 10-cm depth (T(s)) exerted a strong control over R(s), with the annual temperature sensitivity (Q (10)) and basal rate at 10°C (R(s) (10)) being 2.76 and 1.40 µmol m(−2) s(−1), respectively. Both R(s) and short-term (i.e., daily) estimates of R(s) (10) showed pronounced seasonal hysteresis with respect to T(s), with the efflux in the second half of the year being larger than that early in the season for a given temperature. The hysteresis may be associated with the confounding effects of microbial population dynamics and/or litter input. As a result, all of the applied regression models failed to yield unbiased estimates of R(s) over the entire annual cycle. Lags between R(s) and T(s) were observed at the diel scale in the early and late growing season, but not in summer. The seasonality in these lags may be due to the use of a single T(s) measurement depth, which failed to represent seasonal changes in the depth of CO(2) production. Daily estimates of Q (10) averaged 2.04, smaller than the value obtained from the seasonal relationship. In addition, daily Q (10) decreased with increasing T(s), which may contribute feedback to the climate system under global warming scenarios. The use of a fixed, universal Q (10) is considered adequate when modeling annual carbon budgets across large spatial extents. In contrast, a seasonally-varying, environmentally-controlled Q (10) should be used when short-term accuracy is required. Public Library of Science 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3585128/ /pubmed/23469089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057858 Text en © 2013 Jia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jia, Xin
Zha, Tianshan
Wu, Bin
Zhang, Yuqing
Chen, Wenjing
Wang, Xiaoping
Yu, Haiqun
He, Guimei
Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10)
title Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10)
title_full Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10)
title_fullStr Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10)
title_full_unstemmed Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10)
title_short Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q (10)
title_sort temperature response of soil respiration in a chinese pine plantation: hysteresis and seasonal vs. diel q (10)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057858
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaxin temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10
AT zhatianshan temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10
AT wubin temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10
AT zhangyuqing temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10
AT chenwenjing temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10
AT wangxiaoping temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10
AT yuhaiqun temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10
AT heguimei temperatureresponseofsoilrespirationinachinesepineplantationhysteresisandseasonalvsdielq10