Cargando…

Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models

Pulsus paradoxus is an exaggeration of the normal inspiratory decrease in systolic blood pressure. Despite a century of attempts to explain this sign consensus is still lacking. To solve the controversy and reveal the exact mechanism, we reexamined the characteristic anatomic arrangement of the circ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Chang-yang, Cao, Tie-sheng, Yuan, Li-jun, Wang, Zhen, Wang, Kun, Ren, Hua-ri, Yang, Yong, Duan, Yun-you
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057512
_version_ 1782261152291487744
author Xing, Chang-yang
Cao, Tie-sheng
Yuan, Li-jun
Wang, Zhen
Wang, Kun
Ren, Hua-ri
Yang, Yong
Duan, Yun-you
author_facet Xing, Chang-yang
Cao, Tie-sheng
Yuan, Li-jun
Wang, Zhen
Wang, Kun
Ren, Hua-ri
Yang, Yong
Duan, Yun-you
author_sort Xing, Chang-yang
collection PubMed
description Pulsus paradoxus is an exaggeration of the normal inspiratory decrease in systolic blood pressure. Despite a century of attempts to explain this sign consensus is still lacking. To solve the controversy and reveal the exact mechanism, we reexamined the characteristic anatomic arrangement of the circulation system in the chest and designed these mechanical models based on related hydromechanic principles. Model 1 was designed to observe the primary influence of respiratory intrathoracic pressure change (RIPC) on systemic and pulmonary venous return systems (SVR and PVR) respectively. Model 2, as an equivalent mechanical model of septal swing, was to study the secondary influence of RIPC on the motion of the interventriclar septum (IVS), which might be the direct cause for pulsus paradoxus. Model 1 demonstrated that the simulated RIPC had different influence on the simulated SVR and PVR. It increased the volume of the simulated right ventricle (SRV) when the internal pressure was kept constant (8.16 cmH(2)O), while it had the opposite effect on PVR. Model 2 revealed the three major factors determining the respiratory displacement of IVS in normal and different pathophysiological conditions: the magnitude of RIPC, the pressure difference between the two ventricles and the intrapericardial pressure. Our models demonstrate that the different anatomical arrangement of the two venous return systems leads to a different effect of RIPC on right and left ventricles, and thus a pressure gradient across IVS that tends to shift IVS left- and rightwards. When the leftward displacement of IVS reaches a considerable amplitude in some pathologic condition such as cardiac tamponade, the pulsus paradoxus occurs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3585346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35853462013-03-06 Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models Xing, Chang-yang Cao, Tie-sheng Yuan, Li-jun Wang, Zhen Wang, Kun Ren, Hua-ri Yang, Yong Duan, Yun-you PLoS One Research Article Pulsus paradoxus is an exaggeration of the normal inspiratory decrease in systolic blood pressure. Despite a century of attempts to explain this sign consensus is still lacking. To solve the controversy and reveal the exact mechanism, we reexamined the characteristic anatomic arrangement of the circulation system in the chest and designed these mechanical models based on related hydromechanic principles. Model 1 was designed to observe the primary influence of respiratory intrathoracic pressure change (RIPC) on systemic and pulmonary venous return systems (SVR and PVR) respectively. Model 2, as an equivalent mechanical model of septal swing, was to study the secondary influence of RIPC on the motion of the interventriclar septum (IVS), which might be the direct cause for pulsus paradoxus. Model 1 demonstrated that the simulated RIPC had different influence on the simulated SVR and PVR. It increased the volume of the simulated right ventricle (SRV) when the internal pressure was kept constant (8.16 cmH(2)O), while it had the opposite effect on PVR. Model 2 revealed the three major factors determining the respiratory displacement of IVS in normal and different pathophysiological conditions: the magnitude of RIPC, the pressure difference between the two ventricles and the intrapericardial pressure. Our models demonstrate that the different anatomical arrangement of the two venous return systems leads to a different effect of RIPC on right and left ventricles, and thus a pressure gradient across IVS that tends to shift IVS left- and rightwards. When the leftward displacement of IVS reaches a considerable amplitude in some pathologic condition such as cardiac tamponade, the pulsus paradoxus occurs. Public Library of Science 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3585346/ /pubmed/23469010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057512 Text en © 2013 Xing et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xing, Chang-yang
Cao, Tie-sheng
Yuan, Li-jun
Wang, Zhen
Wang, Kun
Ren, Hua-ri
Yang, Yong
Duan, Yun-you
Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models
title Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models
title_full Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models
title_fullStr Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models
title_full_unstemmed Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models
title_short Mechanism Study of Pulsus Paradoxus Using Mechanical Models
title_sort mechanism study of pulsus paradoxus using mechanical models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057512
work_keys_str_mv AT xingchangyang mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels
AT caotiesheng mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels
AT yuanlijun mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels
AT wangzhen mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels
AT wangkun mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels
AT renhuari mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels
AT yangyong mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels
AT duanyunyou mechanismstudyofpulsusparadoxususingmechanicalmodels