Cargando…

Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression

Although objective measures of memory performance typically indicate memory declines with age, self-reported memory failures often show no relation to age. In contrast, self-reported attention failures are reliably negatively correlated with age. This contrast suggests the possibility that age-relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheyne, James Allan, Carriere, Jonathan S. A., Smilek, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23459560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00099
_version_ 1782261169218650112
author Cheyne, James Allan
Carriere, Jonathan S. A.
Smilek, Daniel
author_facet Cheyne, James Allan
Carriere, Jonathan S. A.
Smilek, Daniel
author_sort Cheyne, James Allan
collection PubMed
description Although objective measures of memory performance typically indicate memory declines with age, self-reported memory failures often show no relation to age. In contrast, self-reported attention failures are reliably negatively correlated with age. This contrast suggests the possibility that age-related awareness and reporting of memory failures might be masked by a concurrent decrease in attention failures, which would reduce encoding failures with age and hence reduce perceived memory failures. Self-reported problems of attention and memory were evaluated in two samples with the ages spanning eight decades. Initial analysis indicated that attention failures significantly decreased with age, whereas memory problems did not to differ across age. The association of self-reported memory failures became significantly positive, however, when residualized on attention lapses. In contrast, the correlation between attention lapses and age was modestly affected when memory failures were controlled. These results highlight the close relation of attention lapses and memory problems and, beyond the implications of individual differences in attention for memory research, suggest the advisability of assessing attention failures for a full evaluation of memory problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3585424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35854242013-03-04 Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression Cheyne, James Allan Carriere, Jonathan S. A. Smilek, Daniel Front Psychol Psychology Although objective measures of memory performance typically indicate memory declines with age, self-reported memory failures often show no relation to age. In contrast, self-reported attention failures are reliably negatively correlated with age. This contrast suggests the possibility that age-related awareness and reporting of memory failures might be masked by a concurrent decrease in attention failures, which would reduce encoding failures with age and hence reduce perceived memory failures. Self-reported problems of attention and memory were evaluated in two samples with the ages spanning eight decades. Initial analysis indicated that attention failures significantly decreased with age, whereas memory problems did not to differ across age. The association of self-reported memory failures became significantly positive, however, when residualized on attention lapses. In contrast, the correlation between attention lapses and age was modestly affected when memory failures were controlled. These results highlight the close relation of attention lapses and memory problems and, beyond the implications of individual differences in attention for memory research, suggest the advisability of assessing attention failures for a full evaluation of memory problems. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3585424/ /pubmed/23459560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00099 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cheyne, Carriere and Smilek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Cheyne, James Allan
Carriere, Jonathan S. A.
Smilek, Daniel
Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression
title Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression
title_full Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression
title_fullStr Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression
title_full_unstemmed Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression
title_short Age Differences in Attention Lapses Mask Age Differences in Memory Failures: A Methodological Note on Suppression
title_sort age differences in attention lapses mask age differences in memory failures: a methodological note on suppression
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23459560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00099
work_keys_str_mv AT cheynejamesallan agedifferencesinattentionlapsesmaskagedifferencesinmemoryfailuresamethodologicalnoteonsuppression
AT carrierejonathansa agedifferencesinattentionlapsesmaskagedifferencesinmemoryfailuresamethodologicalnoteonsuppression
AT smilekdaniel agedifferencesinattentionlapsesmaskagedifferencesinmemoryfailuresamethodologicalnoteonsuppression