Cargando…

Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND: The aims of this retrospective analysis were to evaluate the effect of combined superficial and deep groin dissection on disease-free and melanoma-specific survival, and to identify the most important factors for predicting the involvement of deep nodes according to clinically or microsc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mozzillo, Nicola, Caracò, Corrado, Marone, Ugo, Di Monta, Gianluca, Crispo, Anna, Botti, Gerardo, Montella, Maurizio, Ascierto, Paolo Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23379355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-36
_version_ 1782261192676343808
author Mozzillo, Nicola
Caracò, Corrado
Marone, Ugo
Di Monta, Gianluca
Crispo, Anna
Botti, Gerardo
Montella, Maurizio
Ascierto, Paolo Antonio
author_facet Mozzillo, Nicola
Caracò, Corrado
Marone, Ugo
Di Monta, Gianluca
Crispo, Anna
Botti, Gerardo
Montella, Maurizio
Ascierto, Paolo Antonio
author_sort Mozzillo, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aims of this retrospective analysis were to evaluate the effect of combined superficial and deep groin dissection on disease-free and melanoma-specific survival, and to identify the most important factors for predicting the involvement of deep nodes according to clinically or microscopically detected nodal metastases. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 133 consecutive patients with groin lymph node metastases underwent superficial and deep dissection at the National Cancer Institute, Naples. Lymph node involvement was clinically evident in 84 patients and detected by sentinel node biopsy in 49 cases. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival was significantly better for patients with superficial lymph node metastases than for patients with involvement of both superficial and deep lymph nodes (34.9% vs. 19.0%; P = 0.001). The 5-year melanoma-specific survival was also significantly better for patients with superficial node metastases only (55.6% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasis in the deep nodes is the strongest predictor of both disease-free and melanoma-specific survival. Deep groin dissection should be considered for all patients with groin clinical nodal involvement, but might be spared in patients with a positive sentinel node. Prospective studies will clarify the issue further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3585715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35857152013-03-03 Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors Mozzillo, Nicola Caracò, Corrado Marone, Ugo Di Monta, Gianluca Crispo, Anna Botti, Gerardo Montella, Maurizio Ascierto, Paolo Antonio World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aims of this retrospective analysis were to evaluate the effect of combined superficial and deep groin dissection on disease-free and melanoma-specific survival, and to identify the most important factors for predicting the involvement of deep nodes according to clinically or microscopically detected nodal metastases. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 133 consecutive patients with groin lymph node metastases underwent superficial and deep dissection at the National Cancer Institute, Naples. Lymph node involvement was clinically evident in 84 patients and detected by sentinel node biopsy in 49 cases. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival was significantly better for patients with superficial lymph node metastases than for patients with involvement of both superficial and deep lymph nodes (34.9% vs. 19.0%; P = 0.001). The 5-year melanoma-specific survival was also significantly better for patients with superficial node metastases only (55.6% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasis in the deep nodes is the strongest predictor of both disease-free and melanoma-specific survival. Deep groin dissection should be considered for all patients with groin clinical nodal involvement, but might be spared in patients with a positive sentinel node. Prospective studies will clarify the issue further. BioMed Central 2013-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3585715/ /pubmed/23379355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-36 Text en Copyright ©2013 Mozzillo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mozzillo, Nicola
Caracò, Corrado
Marone, Ugo
Di Monta, Gianluca
Crispo, Anna
Botti, Gerardo
Montella, Maurizio
Ascierto, Paolo Antonio
Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
title Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
title_full Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
title_fullStr Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
title_full_unstemmed Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
title_short Superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage III cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
title_sort superficial and deep lymph node dissection for stage iii cutaneous melanoma: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23379355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-36
work_keys_str_mv AT mozzillonicola superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors
AT caracocorrado superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors
AT maroneugo superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors
AT dimontagianluca superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors
AT crispoanna superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors
AT bottigerardo superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors
AT montellamaurizio superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors
AT asciertopaoloantonio superficialanddeeplymphnodedissectionforstageiiicutaneousmelanomaclinicaloutcomeandprognosticfactors