Cargando…

Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify risk factors for active porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection at farm level and to assess the probability of an infected farm being detected through passive disease surveillance in England. Data were obtained from a cross-secti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velasova, Martina, Alarcon, Pablo, Williamson, Susanna, Wieland, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-184
_version_ 1782261235422593024
author Velasova, Martina
Alarcon, Pablo
Williamson, Susanna
Wieland, Barbara
author_facet Velasova, Martina
Alarcon, Pablo
Williamson, Susanna
Wieland, Barbara
author_sort Velasova, Martina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify risk factors for active porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection at farm level and to assess the probability of an infected farm being detected through passive disease surveillance in England. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study on 147 farrow-to-finish farms conducted from April 2008 – April 2009. The risk factors for active PRRSV infection were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The surveillance system was evaluated using a stochastic scenario tree model. RESULTS: Evidence of PRRSV circulation was confirmed on 35.1% (95%CI: 26.8-43.4) of farms in the cross sectional study, with a higher proportion of infected farms in areas with high pig density (more than 15000 pigs within 10 km radius from the farm). Farms were more likely to have active PRRSV infection if they used the live virus vaccine-Porcilis PRRS (OR=7.5, 95%CI: 2.5-22.8), were located in high pig density areas (OR=2.9, 95%CI: 1.0-8.3) or had dead pigs collected (OR=5.6, 95%CI: 1.7-18.3). Farms that weaned pigs at 28 days of age or later had lower odds of being PRRSV positive compared to those weaning at 21-27 days (OR=0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.7). The probability of detecting an infected farm through passive surveillance for disease was low (mode=0.074, 5th and 95th percentiles: 0.067; 0.083 respectively). In particular farms which used live virus vaccine had lower probabilities for detection compared to those which did not. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors identified highlight the importance of biosecurity measures for the incursion of PRRSV infection. The results further indicate that a combined approach of surveillance for infection and disease diagnosis is needed to assist effective control and/or elimination of PRRSV from the pig population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3585917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35859172013-03-12 Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance Velasova, Martina Alarcon, Pablo Williamson, Susanna Wieland, Barbara BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify risk factors for active porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection at farm level and to assess the probability of an infected farm being detected through passive disease surveillance in England. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study on 147 farrow-to-finish farms conducted from April 2008 – April 2009. The risk factors for active PRRSV infection were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The surveillance system was evaluated using a stochastic scenario tree model. RESULTS: Evidence of PRRSV circulation was confirmed on 35.1% (95%CI: 26.8-43.4) of farms in the cross sectional study, with a higher proportion of infected farms in areas with high pig density (more than 15000 pigs within 10 km radius from the farm). Farms were more likely to have active PRRSV infection if they used the live virus vaccine-Porcilis PRRS (OR=7.5, 95%CI: 2.5-22.8), were located in high pig density areas (OR=2.9, 95%CI: 1.0-8.3) or had dead pigs collected (OR=5.6, 95%CI: 1.7-18.3). Farms that weaned pigs at 28 days of age or later had lower odds of being PRRSV positive compared to those weaning at 21-27 days (OR=0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.7). The probability of detecting an infected farm through passive surveillance for disease was low (mode=0.074, 5th and 95th percentiles: 0.067; 0.083 respectively). In particular farms which used live virus vaccine had lower probabilities for detection compared to those which did not. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors identified highlight the importance of biosecurity measures for the incursion of PRRSV infection. The results further indicate that a combined approach of surveillance for infection and disease diagnosis is needed to assist effective control and/or elimination of PRRSV from the pig population. BioMed Central 2012-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3585917/ /pubmed/23034160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-184 Text en Copyright ©2012 Velasova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Velasova, Martina
Alarcon, Pablo
Williamson, Susanna
Wieland, Barbara
Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance
title Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance
title_full Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance
title_fullStr Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance
title_short Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance
title_sort risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection and resulting challenges for effective disease surveillance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-184
work_keys_str_mv AT velasovamartina riskfactorsforporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusinfectionandresultingchallengesforeffectivediseasesurveillance
AT alarconpablo riskfactorsforporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusinfectionandresultingchallengesforeffectivediseasesurveillance
AT williamsonsusanna riskfactorsforporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusinfectionandresultingchallengesforeffectivediseasesurveillance
AT wielandbarbara riskfactorsforporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusinfectionandresultingchallengesforeffectivediseasesurveillance