Cargando…

EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values

Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (EADC) is an indicator of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and reflects the pathological changes of tissues quantitatively. However, no study has been investigated in the space-occupying kidney disease using EADC values. This study aims to evaluate the diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yue-Lang, Yu, Bo-Lang, Ren, Juan, Qu, Kai, Wang, Ke, Qiang, Yong-Qian, Li, Chen-Xia, Sun, Xing-Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23476099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00723-012-0376-z
_version_ 1782261251358851072
author Zhang, Yue-Lang
Yu, Bo-Lang
Ren, Juan
Qu, Kai
Wang, Ke
Qiang, Yong-Qian
Li, Chen-Xia
Sun, Xing-Wang
author_facet Zhang, Yue-Lang
Yu, Bo-Lang
Ren, Juan
Qu, Kai
Wang, Ke
Qiang, Yong-Qian
Li, Chen-Xia
Sun, Xing-Wang
author_sort Zhang, Yue-Lang
collection PubMed
description Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (EADC) is an indicator of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and reflects the pathological changes of tissues quantitatively. However, no study has been investigated in the space-occupying kidney disease using EADC values. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic role of EADC values at a high magnetic field strength (3.0 T) in kidney neoplastic lesions, compared with that of the ADC values. Ninety patients with suspected renal tumors (including 101 suspected renal lesions) and 20 healthy volunteers were performed MRI scanning. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed with a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequence at a diffusion gradient of b = 500 s/mm(2). We found renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be distinguished from angiomyolipoma, and clear cell carcinoma can be distinguished from non-clear cell carcinoma by EADC value. There was significant difference in overall EADC values between renal cell carcinoma (0.150 ± 0.059) and angiomyolipoma (0.270 ± 0.108) when b value was 500 s/mm(2). When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was higher than 0.192, the sensitivity and specificity of EADC value of renal cell carcinoma were 84.6 and 81.1 %, respectively. In conclusion, EADC map shows the internal structure of the kidney tumor more intuitively than the ADC map dose, and is also in line with the observation habits of the clinicians. EADC can be used as an effective imaging method for tumor diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3585986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35859862013-03-07 EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values Zhang, Yue-Lang Yu, Bo-Lang Ren, Juan Qu, Kai Wang, Ke Qiang, Yong-Qian Li, Chen-Xia Sun, Xing-Wang Appl Magn Reson Article Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (EADC) is an indicator of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and reflects the pathological changes of tissues quantitatively. However, no study has been investigated in the space-occupying kidney disease using EADC values. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic role of EADC values at a high magnetic field strength (3.0 T) in kidney neoplastic lesions, compared with that of the ADC values. Ninety patients with suspected renal tumors (including 101 suspected renal lesions) and 20 healthy volunteers were performed MRI scanning. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed with a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequence at a diffusion gradient of b = 500 s/mm(2). We found renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be distinguished from angiomyolipoma, and clear cell carcinoma can be distinguished from non-clear cell carcinoma by EADC value. There was significant difference in overall EADC values between renal cell carcinoma (0.150 ± 0.059) and angiomyolipoma (0.270 ± 0.108) when b value was 500 s/mm(2). When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was higher than 0.192, the sensitivity and specificity of EADC value of renal cell carcinoma were 84.6 and 81.1 %, respectively. In conclusion, EADC map shows the internal structure of the kidney tumor more intuitively than the ADC map dose, and is also in line with the observation habits of the clinicians. EADC can be used as an effective imaging method for tumor diagnosis. Springer Vienna 2012-07-05 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3585986/ /pubmed/23476099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00723-012-0376-z Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Yue-Lang
Yu, Bo-Lang
Ren, Juan
Qu, Kai
Wang, Ke
Qiang, Yong-Qian
Li, Chen-Xia
Sun, Xing-Wang
EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values
title EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values
title_full EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values
title_fullStr EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values
title_full_unstemmed EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values
title_short EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values
title_sort eadc values in diagnosis of renal lesions by 3.0 t diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: compared with the adc values
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3585986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23476099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00723-012-0376-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuelang eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues
AT yubolang eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues
AT renjuan eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues
AT qukai eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues
AT wangke eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues
AT qiangyongqian eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues
AT lichenxia eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues
AT sunxingwang eadcvaluesindiagnosisofrenallesionsby30tdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingcomparedwiththeadcvalues