Cargando…

What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies

OBJECTIVE: Largely, watchful waiting is the initial policy for patients with small-sized or medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, because of slow growth and relatively minor complaints, that do not improve by an intervention. If intervention (microsurgery, radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy) be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolbers, John G, Dallenga, Alof HG, Mendez Romero, Alejandra, van Linge, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23435793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001345
_version_ 1782261282549792768
author Wolbers, John G
Dallenga, Alof HG
Mendez Romero, Alejandra
van Linge, Anne
author_facet Wolbers, John G
Dallenga, Alof HG
Mendez Romero, Alejandra
van Linge, Anne
author_sort Wolbers, John G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Largely, watchful waiting is the initial policy for patients with small-sized or medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, because of slow growth and relatively minor complaints, that do not improve by an intervention. If intervention (microsurgery, radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy) becomes necessary, the choice of intervention appears to be driven by the patient's or clinician's preference rather than by evidence based. This study addresses the existing evidence based on controlled studies of these interventions. DESIGN: A systematic Boolean search was performed focused on controlled intervention studies. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed based on the Sign-50 criteria on cohort studies. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Six eligibility criteria included a controlled intervention study on a newly diagnosed solitary, vestibular schwannoma reporting on clinical outcomes. Two prospective and four retrospective observational, controlled studies published before November 2011 were selected. DATA ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies and extracted the outcome data using predefined formats. RESULTS: Neither randomised studies, nor controlled studies on fractionated radiotherapy were retrieved. Six studies compared radiosurgery and microsurgery in a controlled way. All but one were confined to solitary tumours less than 30 mm in diameter and had no earlier interventions. Four studies qualified for trustworthy conclusions. Among all four, radiosurgery showed the best outcomes: there were no direct mortality, no surgical or anaesthesiological complications, but better facial nerve outcome, better preservation of useful hearing and better quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates radiosurgery to be the best practice for solitary vestibular schwannomas up to 30 mm in cisternal diameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3586173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35861732013-03-11 What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies Wolbers, John G Dallenga, Alof HG Mendez Romero, Alejandra van Linge, Anne BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: Largely, watchful waiting is the initial policy for patients with small-sized or medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, because of slow growth and relatively minor complaints, that do not improve by an intervention. If intervention (microsurgery, radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy) becomes necessary, the choice of intervention appears to be driven by the patient's or clinician's preference rather than by evidence based. This study addresses the existing evidence based on controlled studies of these interventions. DESIGN: A systematic Boolean search was performed focused on controlled intervention studies. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed based on the Sign-50 criteria on cohort studies. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Six eligibility criteria included a controlled intervention study on a newly diagnosed solitary, vestibular schwannoma reporting on clinical outcomes. Two prospective and four retrospective observational, controlled studies published before November 2011 were selected. DATA ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies and extracted the outcome data using predefined formats. RESULTS: Neither randomised studies, nor controlled studies on fractionated radiotherapy were retrieved. Six studies compared radiosurgery and microsurgery in a controlled way. All but one were confined to solitary tumours less than 30 mm in diameter and had no earlier interventions. Four studies qualified for trustworthy conclusions. Among all four, radiosurgery showed the best outcomes: there were no direct mortality, no surgical or anaesthesiological complications, but better facial nerve outcome, better preservation of useful hearing and better quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates radiosurgery to be the best practice for solitary vestibular schwannomas up to 30 mm in cisternal diameter. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3586173/ /pubmed/23435793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001345 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Wolbers, John G
Dallenga, Alof HG
Mendez Romero, Alejandra
van Linge, Anne
What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies
title What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies
title_full What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies
title_fullStr What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies
title_full_unstemmed What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies
title_short What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies
title_sort what intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? a systematic review of controlled studies
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23435793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001345
work_keys_str_mv AT wolbersjohng whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies
AT dallengaalofhg whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies
AT mendezromeroalejandra whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies
AT vanlingeanne whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies