Cargando…
What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies
OBJECTIVE: Largely, watchful waiting is the initial policy for patients with small-sized or medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, because of slow growth and relatively minor complaints, that do not improve by an intervention. If intervention (microsurgery, radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy) be...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23435793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001345 |
_version_ | 1782261282549792768 |
---|---|
author | Wolbers, John G Dallenga, Alof HG Mendez Romero, Alejandra van Linge, Anne |
author_facet | Wolbers, John G Dallenga, Alof HG Mendez Romero, Alejandra van Linge, Anne |
author_sort | Wolbers, John G |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Largely, watchful waiting is the initial policy for patients with small-sized or medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, because of slow growth and relatively minor complaints, that do not improve by an intervention. If intervention (microsurgery, radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy) becomes necessary, the choice of intervention appears to be driven by the patient's or clinician's preference rather than by evidence based. This study addresses the existing evidence based on controlled studies of these interventions. DESIGN: A systematic Boolean search was performed focused on controlled intervention studies. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed based on the Sign-50 criteria on cohort studies. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Six eligibility criteria included a controlled intervention study on a newly diagnosed solitary, vestibular schwannoma reporting on clinical outcomes. Two prospective and four retrospective observational, controlled studies published before November 2011 were selected. DATA ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies and extracted the outcome data using predefined formats. RESULTS: Neither randomised studies, nor controlled studies on fractionated radiotherapy were retrieved. Six studies compared radiosurgery and microsurgery in a controlled way. All but one were confined to solitary tumours less than 30 mm in diameter and had no earlier interventions. Four studies qualified for trustworthy conclusions. Among all four, radiosurgery showed the best outcomes: there were no direct mortality, no surgical or anaesthesiological complications, but better facial nerve outcome, better preservation of useful hearing and better quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates radiosurgery to be the best practice for solitary vestibular schwannomas up to 30 mm in cisternal diameter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3586173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35861732013-03-11 What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies Wolbers, John G Dallenga, Alof HG Mendez Romero, Alejandra van Linge, Anne BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: Largely, watchful waiting is the initial policy for patients with small-sized or medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, because of slow growth and relatively minor complaints, that do not improve by an intervention. If intervention (microsurgery, radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy) becomes necessary, the choice of intervention appears to be driven by the patient's or clinician's preference rather than by evidence based. This study addresses the existing evidence based on controlled studies of these interventions. DESIGN: A systematic Boolean search was performed focused on controlled intervention studies. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed based on the Sign-50 criteria on cohort studies. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Six eligibility criteria included a controlled intervention study on a newly diagnosed solitary, vestibular schwannoma reporting on clinical outcomes. Two prospective and four retrospective observational, controlled studies published before November 2011 were selected. DATA ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies and extracted the outcome data using predefined formats. RESULTS: Neither randomised studies, nor controlled studies on fractionated radiotherapy were retrieved. Six studies compared radiosurgery and microsurgery in a controlled way. All but one were confined to solitary tumours less than 30 mm in diameter and had no earlier interventions. Four studies qualified for trustworthy conclusions. Among all four, radiosurgery showed the best outcomes: there were no direct mortality, no surgical or anaesthesiological complications, but better facial nerve outcome, better preservation of useful hearing and better quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates radiosurgery to be the best practice for solitary vestibular schwannomas up to 30 mm in cisternal diameter. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3586173/ /pubmed/23435793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001345 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Wolbers, John G Dallenga, Alof HG Mendez Romero, Alejandra van Linge, Anne What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies |
title | What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies |
title_full | What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies |
title_fullStr | What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies |
title_full_unstemmed | What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies |
title_short | What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies |
title_sort | what intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? a systematic review of controlled studies |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23435793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolbersjohng whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies AT dallengaalofhg whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies AT mendezromeroalejandra whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies AT vanlingeanne whatinterventionisbestpracticeforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreviewofcontrolledstudies |