Cargando…

A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) determine the validity and reliability of the Nova Biomedical Lactate Plus portable analyzer, and quantify any fixed or proportional bias; (2) determine the effect of any bias on the determination of the lactate threshold and (3) determine the effect t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hart, Sarah, Drevets, Kathryn, Alford, Micah, Salacinski, Amanda, Hunt, Brian E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23449745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001899
_version_ 1782261283216687104
author Hart, Sarah
Drevets, Kathryn
Alford, Micah
Salacinski, Amanda
Hunt, Brian E
author_facet Hart, Sarah
Drevets, Kathryn
Alford, Micah
Salacinski, Amanda
Hunt, Brian E
author_sort Hart, Sarah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) determine the validity and reliability of the Nova Biomedical Lactate Plus portable analyzer, and quantify any fixed or proportional bias; (2) determine the effect of any bias on the determination of the lactate threshold and (3) determine the effect that blood sampling methods have on validity and reliability. DESIGN: In this method comparison study we compared blood lactate concentration measured using the Lactate Plus portable analyzer to lactate concentration measured by a reference analyzer, the YSI 2300. SETTING: University campus in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen active men and women performed a discontinuous graded exercise test to volitional exhaustion on a motorised treadmill. Blood samples were taken via finger prick and collected in microcapillary tubes for analysis by the reference instrument at the end of each stage. Duplicate samples for the portable analyzer were either taken directly from the finger or from the micro capillary tubes. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Ordinary least products regressions were used to assess validity, reliability and bias in the portable analyzer. Lactate threshold was determined by visual inspection. RESULTS: Though measurements from both instruments were correlated (r=0.91), the differences between instruments had large variability (SD=1.45 mM/l) when blood was sampled directly from finger. This variability was reduced by ∼95% when both instruments measured blood collected in the capillary tubes. As the proportional and fixed bias between instruments was small, there was no difference in estimates of the lactate threshold between instruments. Reliability for the portable instrument was strong (r=0.99, p<0.05) with no proportional bias (slope=1.02) and small fixed bias (−0.19 mM/l). CONCLUSIONS: The Lactate Plus analyzer provides accurate and reproducible measurements of blood lactate concentration that can be used to estimate workloads corresponding to blood lactate transitions or any absolute lactate concentrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3586176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35861762013-03-11 A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer Hart, Sarah Drevets, Kathryn Alford, Micah Salacinski, Amanda Hunt, Brian E BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) determine the validity and reliability of the Nova Biomedical Lactate Plus portable analyzer, and quantify any fixed or proportional bias; (2) determine the effect of any bias on the determination of the lactate threshold and (3) determine the effect that blood sampling methods have on validity and reliability. DESIGN: In this method comparison study we compared blood lactate concentration measured using the Lactate Plus portable analyzer to lactate concentration measured by a reference analyzer, the YSI 2300. SETTING: University campus in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen active men and women performed a discontinuous graded exercise test to volitional exhaustion on a motorised treadmill. Blood samples were taken via finger prick and collected in microcapillary tubes for analysis by the reference instrument at the end of each stage. Duplicate samples for the portable analyzer were either taken directly from the finger or from the micro capillary tubes. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Ordinary least products regressions were used to assess validity, reliability and bias in the portable analyzer. Lactate threshold was determined by visual inspection. RESULTS: Though measurements from both instruments were correlated (r=0.91), the differences between instruments had large variability (SD=1.45 mM/l) when blood was sampled directly from finger. This variability was reduced by ∼95% when both instruments measured blood collected in the capillary tubes. As the proportional and fixed bias between instruments was small, there was no difference in estimates of the lactate threshold between instruments. Reliability for the portable instrument was strong (r=0.99, p<0.05) with no proportional bias (slope=1.02) and small fixed bias (−0.19 mM/l). CONCLUSIONS: The Lactate Plus analyzer provides accurate and reproducible measurements of blood lactate concentration that can be used to estimate workloads corresponding to blood lactate transitions or any absolute lactate concentrations. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3586176/ /pubmed/23449745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001899 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Hart, Sarah
Drevets, Kathryn
Alford, Micah
Salacinski, Amanda
Hunt, Brian E
A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer
title A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer
title_full A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer
title_fullStr A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer
title_full_unstemmed A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer
title_short A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer
title_sort method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the lactate plus analyzer
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23449745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001899
work_keys_str_mv AT hartsarah amethodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT drevetskathryn amethodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT alfordmicah amethodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT salacinskiamanda amethodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT huntbriane amethodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT hartsarah methodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT drevetskathryn methodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT alfordmicah methodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT salacinskiamanda methodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer
AT huntbriane methodcomparisonstudyregardingthevalidityandreliabilityofthelactateplusanalyzer