Cargando…

Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To describe how criteria for amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) have been operationalised in randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). DESIGN: Systematic review. INFORMATION SOURCES: EMBASE, PubMed and PSYCHInfo were searched from their inception to February 2012. Electronic cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christa Maree Stephan, Blossom, Minett, Thais, Pagett, Emma, Siervo, Mario, Brayne, Carol, McKeith, Ian G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23386579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001909
_version_ 1782261284341809152
author Christa Maree Stephan, Blossom
Minett, Thais
Pagett, Emma
Siervo, Mario
Brayne, Carol
McKeith, Ian G
author_facet Christa Maree Stephan, Blossom
Minett, Thais
Pagett, Emma
Siervo, Mario
Brayne, Carol
McKeith, Ian G
author_sort Christa Maree Stephan, Blossom
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe how criteria for amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) have been operationalised in randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). DESIGN: Systematic review. INFORMATION SOURCES: EMBASE, PubMed and PSYCHInfo were searched from their inception to February 2012. Electronic clinical trial registries were also searched (February 2012). STUDY SELECTION: RCTs were included where participant selection was made using Petersen et al-defined aMCI. There was no restriction on intervention type or the outcome tested. DATA EXTRACTION: For each trial, we extracted information on study design, demographics, exclusion criteria and the operationalisation strategy for the five aMCI diagnostic criteria including: (1) memory complaint, (2) normal general cognitive function, (3) memory impairment, (4) no functional impairment and (5) no dementia. RESULTS: 223 articles and 278 registered trials were reviewed, of which 22 met inclusion criteria. Various methods were applied for operationalising aMCI criteria resulting in variability in participant selection. Memory complaint and assessment of general cognitive function were the most consistently measured criteria. There was large heterogeneity in the neuropsychological methods used to determine memory impairment. It was not possible to assess the impact of these differences on case selection accuracy for dementia prediction. Further limitations include selective and unclear reporting of how each of the criteria was measured. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the urgent need for a standardised approach to map aMCI. Lack of uniformity in clinical diagnosis, however, is not exclusively a problem for MCI but also for other clinical states such as dementia including Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body, frontotemporal or vascular dementia. Defining a uniform approach to MCI classification, or indeed for any classification concept within the field of dementia, should be a priority if further trials are to be undertaken in the older aged population based on these concepts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3586181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35861812013-03-05 Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review Christa Maree Stephan, Blossom Minett, Thais Pagett, Emma Siervo, Mario Brayne, Carol McKeith, Ian G BMJ Open Neurology OBJECTIVE: To describe how criteria for amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) have been operationalised in randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). DESIGN: Systematic review. INFORMATION SOURCES: EMBASE, PubMed and PSYCHInfo were searched from their inception to February 2012. Electronic clinical trial registries were also searched (February 2012). STUDY SELECTION: RCTs were included where participant selection was made using Petersen et al-defined aMCI. There was no restriction on intervention type or the outcome tested. DATA EXTRACTION: For each trial, we extracted information on study design, demographics, exclusion criteria and the operationalisation strategy for the five aMCI diagnostic criteria including: (1) memory complaint, (2) normal general cognitive function, (3) memory impairment, (4) no functional impairment and (5) no dementia. RESULTS: 223 articles and 278 registered trials were reviewed, of which 22 met inclusion criteria. Various methods were applied for operationalising aMCI criteria resulting in variability in participant selection. Memory complaint and assessment of general cognitive function were the most consistently measured criteria. There was large heterogeneity in the neuropsychological methods used to determine memory impairment. It was not possible to assess the impact of these differences on case selection accuracy for dementia prediction. Further limitations include selective and unclear reporting of how each of the criteria was measured. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the urgent need for a standardised approach to map aMCI. Lack of uniformity in clinical diagnosis, however, is not exclusively a problem for MCI but also for other clinical states such as dementia including Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body, frontotemporal or vascular dementia. Defining a uniform approach to MCI classification, or indeed for any classification concept within the field of dementia, should be a priority if further trials are to be undertaken in the older aged population based on these concepts. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3586181/ /pubmed/23386579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001909 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Neurology
Christa Maree Stephan, Blossom
Minett, Thais
Pagett, Emma
Siervo, Mario
Brayne, Carol
McKeith, Ian G
Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review
title Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review
title_full Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review
title_short Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in clinical trials: a systematic review
title_sort diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (mci) in clinical trials: a systematic review
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23386579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001909
work_keys_str_mv AT christamareestephanblossom diagnosingmildcognitiveimpairmentmciinclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT minettthais diagnosingmildcognitiveimpairmentmciinclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT pagettemma diagnosingmildcognitiveimpairmentmciinclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT siervomario diagnosingmildcognitiveimpairmentmciinclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT braynecarol diagnosingmildcognitiveimpairmentmciinclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT mckeithiang diagnosingmildcognitiveimpairmentmciinclinicaltrialsasystematicreview