Cargando…

Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking

BACKGROUND: African Americans are disproportionately exposed to cigarette advertisements, particularly for menthol brands. Tobacco industry documents outline strategic efforts to promote menthol cigarettes to African Americans at the point of sale, and studies have observed more outdoor and retail m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dauphinee, Amanda L, Doxey, Juliana R, Schleicher, Nina C, Fortmann, Stephen P, Henriksen, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-170
_version_ 1782261289555329024
author Dauphinee, Amanda L
Doxey, Juliana R
Schleicher, Nina C
Fortmann, Stephen P
Henriksen, Lisa
author_facet Dauphinee, Amanda L
Doxey, Juliana R
Schleicher, Nina C
Fortmann, Stephen P
Henriksen, Lisa
author_sort Dauphinee, Amanda L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: African Americans are disproportionately exposed to cigarette advertisements, particularly for menthol brands. Tobacco industry documents outline strategic efforts to promote menthol cigarettes to African Americans at the point of sale, and studies have observed more outdoor and retail menthol advertisements in neighborhoods with more African-American residents. Little research has been conducted to examine the effect of this target marketing on adolescents’ recognition of cigarette brand advertising and on smoking uptake. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine racial differences in brand recognition and to assess the prospective relationship between brand recognition and smoking uptake. METHODS: School-based surveys assessing tobacco use and environmental and social influences to smoke were administered to 6th through 9th graders (ages 11 to 15) in an urban and racially diverse California school district. The primary outcome for the cross-sectional analysis (n = 2,589) was brand recognition, measured by students’ identification of masked tobacco advertisements from the point of sale. The primary outcome for the longitudinal analysis (n = 1,179) was progression from never to ever smoking within 12 months. RESULTS: At baseline, 52% of students recognized the Camel brand, 36% Marlboro, and 32% Newport. African-American students were three times more likely than others to recognize Newport (OR = 3.03, CI = 2.45, 3.74, p < 0.01) and less likely than others to recognize Marlboro (OR = 0.60, CI = 0.48, 0.73, p < 0.01). At follow-up, 17% of never smokers reported trying smoking. In this racially diverse sample, brand recognition of Camel and Marlboro did not predict smoking initiation. Regardless of race, students who recognized the Newport brand at baseline were more likely to initiate smoking at follow-up (OR = 1.49, CI = 1.04, 2.15, p < 0.05) after adjusting for shopping frequency and other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings illustrate that African-American youth are better able to recognize Newport cigarette advertisements, even after adjustment for exposure to smoking by parents and peers. In addition, recognition of Newport cigarette advertising predicted smoking initiation, regardless of race. This longitudinal study contributes to a growing body of evidence that supports a ban on menthol flavored cigarettes in the US as well as stronger regulation of tobacco advertising at the point of sale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3586353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35863532013-03-03 Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking Dauphinee, Amanda L Doxey, Juliana R Schleicher, Nina C Fortmann, Stephen P Henriksen, Lisa BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: African Americans are disproportionately exposed to cigarette advertisements, particularly for menthol brands. Tobacco industry documents outline strategic efforts to promote menthol cigarettes to African Americans at the point of sale, and studies have observed more outdoor and retail menthol advertisements in neighborhoods with more African-American residents. Little research has been conducted to examine the effect of this target marketing on adolescents’ recognition of cigarette brand advertising and on smoking uptake. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine racial differences in brand recognition and to assess the prospective relationship between brand recognition and smoking uptake. METHODS: School-based surveys assessing tobacco use and environmental and social influences to smoke were administered to 6th through 9th graders (ages 11 to 15) in an urban and racially diverse California school district. The primary outcome for the cross-sectional analysis (n = 2,589) was brand recognition, measured by students’ identification of masked tobacco advertisements from the point of sale. The primary outcome for the longitudinal analysis (n = 1,179) was progression from never to ever smoking within 12 months. RESULTS: At baseline, 52% of students recognized the Camel brand, 36% Marlboro, and 32% Newport. African-American students were three times more likely than others to recognize Newport (OR = 3.03, CI = 2.45, 3.74, p < 0.01) and less likely than others to recognize Marlboro (OR = 0.60, CI = 0.48, 0.73, p < 0.01). At follow-up, 17% of never smokers reported trying smoking. In this racially diverse sample, brand recognition of Camel and Marlboro did not predict smoking initiation. Regardless of race, students who recognized the Newport brand at baseline were more likely to initiate smoking at follow-up (OR = 1.49, CI = 1.04, 2.15, p < 0.05) after adjusting for shopping frequency and other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings illustrate that African-American youth are better able to recognize Newport cigarette advertisements, even after adjustment for exposure to smoking by parents and peers. In addition, recognition of Newport cigarette advertising predicted smoking initiation, regardless of race. This longitudinal study contributes to a growing body of evidence that supports a ban on menthol flavored cigarettes in the US as well as stronger regulation of tobacco advertising at the point of sale. BioMed Central 2013-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3586353/ /pubmed/23442215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-170 Text en Copyright ©2013 Dauphinee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dauphinee, Amanda L
Doxey, Juliana R
Schleicher, Nina C
Fortmann, Stephen P
Henriksen, Lisa
Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking
title Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking
title_full Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking
title_fullStr Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking
title_full_unstemmed Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking
title_short Racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking
title_sort racial differences in cigarette brand recognition and impact on youth smoking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-170
work_keys_str_mv AT dauphineeamandal racialdifferencesincigarettebrandrecognitionandimpactonyouthsmoking
AT doxeyjulianar racialdifferencesincigarettebrandrecognitionandimpactonyouthsmoking
AT schleicherninac racialdifferencesincigarettebrandrecognitionandimpactonyouthsmoking
AT fortmannstephenp racialdifferencesincigarettebrandrecognitionandimpactonyouthsmoking
AT henriksenlisa racialdifferencesincigarettebrandrecognitionandimpactonyouthsmoking