Cargando…
Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta
Species distribution modeling (SDM) is an important tool to assess the impact of global environmental change. Many species exhibit ecologically relevant intraspecific variation, and few studies have analyzed its relevance for SDM. Here, we compared three SDM techniques for the highly variable specie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23467191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.426 |
_version_ | 1782261337118736384 |
---|---|
author | Oney, Brian Reineking, Björn O'Neill, Gregory Kreyling, Juergen |
author_facet | Oney, Brian Reineking, Björn O'Neill, Gregory Kreyling, Juergen |
author_sort | Oney, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Species distribution modeling (SDM) is an important tool to assess the impact of global environmental change. Many species exhibit ecologically relevant intraspecific variation, and few studies have analyzed its relevance for SDM. Here, we compared three SDM techniques for the highly variable species Pinus contorta. First, applying a conventional SDM approach, we used MaxEnt to model the subject as a single species (species model), based on presence–absence observations. Second, we used MaxEnt to model each of the three most prevalent subspecies independently and combined their projected distributions (subspecies model). Finally, we used a universal growth transfer function (UTF), an approach to incorporate intraspecific variation utilizing provenance trial tree growth data. Different model approaches performed similarly when predicting current distributions. MaxEnt model discrimination was greater (AUC – species model: 0.94, subspecies model: 0.95, UTF: 0.89), but the UTF was better calibrated (slope and bias – species model: 1.31 and −0.58, subspecies model: 1.44 and −0.43, UTF: 1.01 and 0.04, respectively). Contrastingly, for future climatic conditions, projections of lodgepole pine habitat suitability diverged. In particular, when the species' intraspecific variability was acknowledged, the species was projected to better tolerate climatic change as related to suitable habitat without migration (subspecies model: 26% habitat loss or UTF: 24% habitat loss vs. species model: 60% habitat loss), and given unlimited migration may increase amount of suitable habitat (subspecies model: 8% habitat gain or UTF: 12% habitat gain vs. species model: 51% habitat loss) in the climatic period 2070–2100 (SRES A2 scenario, HADCM3). We conclude that models derived from within-species data produce different and better projections, and coincide with ecological theory. Furthermore, we conclude that intraspecific variation may buffer against adverse effects of climate change. A key future research challenge lies in assessing the extent to which species can utilize intraspecific variation under rapid environmental change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3586652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35866522013-03-05 Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta Oney, Brian Reineking, Björn O'Neill, Gregory Kreyling, Juergen Ecol Evol Original Research Species distribution modeling (SDM) is an important tool to assess the impact of global environmental change. Many species exhibit ecologically relevant intraspecific variation, and few studies have analyzed its relevance for SDM. Here, we compared three SDM techniques for the highly variable species Pinus contorta. First, applying a conventional SDM approach, we used MaxEnt to model the subject as a single species (species model), based on presence–absence observations. Second, we used MaxEnt to model each of the three most prevalent subspecies independently and combined their projected distributions (subspecies model). Finally, we used a universal growth transfer function (UTF), an approach to incorporate intraspecific variation utilizing provenance trial tree growth data. Different model approaches performed similarly when predicting current distributions. MaxEnt model discrimination was greater (AUC – species model: 0.94, subspecies model: 0.95, UTF: 0.89), but the UTF was better calibrated (slope and bias – species model: 1.31 and −0.58, subspecies model: 1.44 and −0.43, UTF: 1.01 and 0.04, respectively). Contrastingly, for future climatic conditions, projections of lodgepole pine habitat suitability diverged. In particular, when the species' intraspecific variability was acknowledged, the species was projected to better tolerate climatic change as related to suitable habitat without migration (subspecies model: 26% habitat loss or UTF: 24% habitat loss vs. species model: 60% habitat loss), and given unlimited migration may increase amount of suitable habitat (subspecies model: 8% habitat gain or UTF: 12% habitat gain vs. species model: 51% habitat loss) in the climatic period 2070–2100 (SRES A2 scenario, HADCM3). We conclude that models derived from within-species data produce different and better projections, and coincide with ecological theory. Furthermore, we conclude that intraspecific variation may buffer against adverse effects of climate change. A key future research challenge lies in assessing the extent to which species can utilize intraspecific variation under rapid environmental change. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-02 2013-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3586652/ /pubmed/23467191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.426 Text en © 2013 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Oney, Brian Reineking, Björn O'Neill, Gregory Kreyling, Juergen Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta |
title | Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta |
title_full | Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta |
title_fullStr | Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta |
title_short | Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta |
title_sort | intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on pinus contorta |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23467191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oneybrian intraspecificvariationbuffersprojectedclimatechangeimpactsonpinuscontorta AT reinekingbjorn intraspecificvariationbuffersprojectedclimatechangeimpactsonpinuscontorta AT oneillgregory intraspecificvariationbuffersprojectedclimatechangeimpactsonpinuscontorta AT kreylingjuergen intraspecificvariationbuffersprojectedclimatechangeimpactsonpinuscontorta |