Cargando…

Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. METHODS: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornfield, Rachel, Donohue, Julie, Berndt, Ernst R., Alexander, G. Caleb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3587616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055504
_version_ 1782261421761888256
author Kornfield, Rachel
Donohue, Julie
Berndt, Ernst R.
Alexander, G. Caleb
author_facet Kornfield, Rachel
Donohue, Julie
Berndt, Ernst R.
Alexander, G. Caleb
author_sort Kornfield, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. METHODS: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($ and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies. RESULTS: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at US$36.1 billion (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to $27.7B (9.0% of sales). Between 2006 and 2010, similar declines were seen for promotion to providers and DTCA (both by 25%). DTCA’s share of total promotion increased from 12% in 2002 to 18% in 2006, but then declined to 16% and remains highly concentrated. Number of products promoted to providers peaked in 2004 at over 3000, and then declined 20% by 2010. In contrast to top-selling small molecule therapies having an average of $370 million (8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only $33 million (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001–2010. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3587616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35876162013-03-06 Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010 Kornfield, Rachel Donohue, Julie Berndt, Ernst R. Alexander, G. Caleb PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. METHODS: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($ and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies. RESULTS: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at US$36.1 billion (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to $27.7B (9.0% of sales). Between 2006 and 2010, similar declines were seen for promotion to providers and DTCA (both by 25%). DTCA’s share of total promotion increased from 12% in 2002 to 18% in 2006, but then declined to 16% and remains highly concentrated. Number of products promoted to providers peaked in 2004 at over 3000, and then declined 20% by 2010. In contrast to top-selling small molecule therapies having an average of $370 million (8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only $33 million (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001–2010. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies. Public Library of Science 2013-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3587616/ /pubmed/23469165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055504 Text en © 2013 Kornfield et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kornfield, Rachel
Donohue, Julie
Berndt, Ernst R.
Alexander, G. Caleb
Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_full Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_fullStr Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_full_unstemmed Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_short Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_sort promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001–2010
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3587616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055504
work_keys_str_mv AT kornfieldrachel promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010
AT donohuejulie promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010
AT berndternstr promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010
AT alexandergcaleb promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010