Cargando…

Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows non-invasive manipulation of brain activity during active task performance. Because every TMS pulse is accompanied by non-neural effects such as a clicking sound and somato-sensation on the head, control conditions are required to ensure that changes in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duecker, Felix, Sack, Alexander T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3587629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057765
_version_ 1782261426032738304
author Duecker, Felix
Sack, Alexander T.
author_facet Duecker, Felix
Sack, Alexander T.
author_sort Duecker, Felix
collection PubMed
description Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows non-invasive manipulation of brain activity during active task performance. Because every TMS pulse is accompanied by non-neural effects such as a clicking sound and somato-sensation on the head, control conditions are required to ensure that changes in task behavior are indeed due to the induced neural effects. However, the non-neural effects of TMS in the context of a given task performance are largely unknown and, consequently, it is unclear what constitutes a valid control condition. We explored the non-neural effects of TMS on visual target detection. Participants received single pulse sham TMS to each hemisphere at different time points prior to target appearance during a visual target detection task. It was hypothesized that the clicking sound of a sham TMS pulse differentially affects performance depending on the location of the coil and the timing of the pulse.Our results show that, first, sham TMS caused a facilitation of reaction times when preceding the target stimulus by 150, 200, and 250 ms, whereas earlier and later time windows were not effective. Second, positioning the TMS coil ipsilateral instead of contralateral relative to the target stimulus improved reaction times. Third, infrequent noTMS trials that were interleaved with sham TMS trials had oddball-like properties resulting in increased reaction times during noTMS. The clicking sound produced by sham TMS influences task performance in multiple ways. These non-neural effects of TMS need to be controlled for in TMS research and the present findings provide an empirical basis for deciding what constitutes a valid control condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3587629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35876292013-03-06 Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection Duecker, Felix Sack, Alexander T. PLoS One Research Article Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows non-invasive manipulation of brain activity during active task performance. Because every TMS pulse is accompanied by non-neural effects such as a clicking sound and somato-sensation on the head, control conditions are required to ensure that changes in task behavior are indeed due to the induced neural effects. However, the non-neural effects of TMS in the context of a given task performance are largely unknown and, consequently, it is unclear what constitutes a valid control condition. We explored the non-neural effects of TMS on visual target detection. Participants received single pulse sham TMS to each hemisphere at different time points prior to target appearance during a visual target detection task. It was hypothesized that the clicking sound of a sham TMS pulse differentially affects performance depending on the location of the coil and the timing of the pulse.Our results show that, first, sham TMS caused a facilitation of reaction times when preceding the target stimulus by 150, 200, and 250 ms, whereas earlier and later time windows were not effective. Second, positioning the TMS coil ipsilateral instead of contralateral relative to the target stimulus improved reaction times. Third, infrequent noTMS trials that were interleaved with sham TMS trials had oddball-like properties resulting in increased reaction times during noTMS. The clicking sound produced by sham TMS influences task performance in multiple ways. These non-neural effects of TMS need to be controlled for in TMS research and the present findings provide an empirical basis for deciding what constitutes a valid control condition. Public Library of Science 2013-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3587629/ /pubmed/23469232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057765 Text en © 2013 Duecker, Sack http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duecker, Felix
Sack, Alexander T.
Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection
title Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection
title_full Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection
title_fullStr Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection
title_full_unstemmed Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection
title_short Pre-Stimulus Sham TMS Facilitates Target Detection
title_sort pre-stimulus sham tms facilitates target detection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3587629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23469232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057765
work_keys_str_mv AT dueckerfelix prestimulusshamtmsfacilitatestargetdetection
AT sackalexandert prestimulusshamtmsfacilitatestargetdetection