Cargando…
Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer
ABSTRACT: Molecular classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently based on microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS or BRAF mutation and, occasionally, chromosomal instability (CIN). Whilst useful, these categories may not fully represent the underlying molecular subgroups. We screened 906 st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4139 |
_version_ | 1782261507900309504 |
---|---|
author | Domingo, Enric Ramamoorthy, Rajarajan Oukrif, Dahmane Rosmarin, Daniel Presz, Michal Wang, Haitao Pulker, Hannah Lockstone, Helen Hveem, Tarjei Cranston, Treena Danielsen, Havard Novelli, Marco Davidson, Brian Xu, Zheng-Zhou Molloy, Peter Johnstone, Elaine Holmes, Christopher Midgley, Rachel Kerr, David Sieber, Oliver Tomlinson, Ian |
author_facet | Domingo, Enric Ramamoorthy, Rajarajan Oukrif, Dahmane Rosmarin, Daniel Presz, Michal Wang, Haitao Pulker, Hannah Lockstone, Helen Hveem, Tarjei Cranston, Treena Danielsen, Havard Novelli, Marco Davidson, Brian Xu, Zheng-Zhou Molloy, Peter Johnstone, Elaine Holmes, Christopher Midgley, Rachel Kerr, David Sieber, Oliver Tomlinson, Ian |
author_sort | Domingo, Enric |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Molecular classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently based on microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS or BRAF mutation and, occasionally, chromosomal instability (CIN). Whilst useful, these categories may not fully represent the underlying molecular subgroups. We screened 906 stage II/III CRCs from the VICTOR clinical trial for somatic mutations. Multivariate analyses (logistic regression, clustering, Bayesian networks) identified the primary molecular associations. Positive associations occurred between: CIN and TP53 mutation; MSI and BRAF mutation; and KRAS and PIK3CA mutations. Negative associations occurred between: MSI and CIN; MSI and NRAS mutation; and KRAS mutation, and each of NRAS, TP53 and BRAF mutations. Some complex relationships were elucidated: KRAS and TP53 mutations had both a direct negative association and a weaker, confounding, positive association via TP53–CIN–MSI–BRAF–KRAS. Our results suggested a new molecular classification of CRCs: (1) MSI(+) and/or BRAF-mutant; (2) CIN(+) and/or TP53(–) mutant, with wild-type KRAS and PIK3CA; (3) KRAS- and/or PIK3CA-mutant, CIN(+), TP53-wild-type; (4) KRAS(–) and/or PIK3CA-mutant, CIN(–), TP53-wild-type; (5) NRAS-mutant; (6) no mutations; (7) others. As expected, group 1 cancers were mostly proximal and poorly differentiated, usually occurring in women. Unexpectedly, two different types of CIN(+) CRC were found: group 2 cancers were usually distal and occurred in men, whereas group 3 showed neither of these associations but were of higher stage. CIN(+) cancers have conventionally been associated with all three of these variables, because they have been tested en masse. Our classification also showed potentially improved prognostic capabilities, with group 3, and possibly group 1, independently predicting disease-free survival. Copyright © 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3588155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35881552013-03-11 Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer Domingo, Enric Ramamoorthy, Rajarajan Oukrif, Dahmane Rosmarin, Daniel Presz, Michal Wang, Haitao Pulker, Hannah Lockstone, Helen Hveem, Tarjei Cranston, Treena Danielsen, Havard Novelli, Marco Davidson, Brian Xu, Zheng-Zhou Molloy, Peter Johnstone, Elaine Holmes, Christopher Midgley, Rachel Kerr, David Sieber, Oliver Tomlinson, Ian J Pathol Original Paper ABSTRACT: Molecular classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently based on microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS or BRAF mutation and, occasionally, chromosomal instability (CIN). Whilst useful, these categories may not fully represent the underlying molecular subgroups. We screened 906 stage II/III CRCs from the VICTOR clinical trial for somatic mutations. Multivariate analyses (logistic regression, clustering, Bayesian networks) identified the primary molecular associations. Positive associations occurred between: CIN and TP53 mutation; MSI and BRAF mutation; and KRAS and PIK3CA mutations. Negative associations occurred between: MSI and CIN; MSI and NRAS mutation; and KRAS mutation, and each of NRAS, TP53 and BRAF mutations. Some complex relationships were elucidated: KRAS and TP53 mutations had both a direct negative association and a weaker, confounding, positive association via TP53–CIN–MSI–BRAF–KRAS. Our results suggested a new molecular classification of CRCs: (1) MSI(+) and/or BRAF-mutant; (2) CIN(+) and/or TP53(–) mutant, with wild-type KRAS and PIK3CA; (3) KRAS- and/or PIK3CA-mutant, CIN(+), TP53-wild-type; (4) KRAS(–) and/or PIK3CA-mutant, CIN(–), TP53-wild-type; (5) NRAS-mutant; (6) no mutations; (7) others. As expected, group 1 cancers were mostly proximal and poorly differentiated, usually occurring in women. Unexpectedly, two different types of CIN(+) CRC were found: group 2 cancers were usually distal and occurred in men, whereas group 3 showed neither of these associations but were of higher stage. CIN(+) cancers have conventionally been associated with all three of these variables, because they have been tested en masse. Our classification also showed potentially improved prognostic capabilities, with group 3, and possibly group 1, independently predicting disease-free survival. Copyright © 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2013-02 2013-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3588155/ /pubmed/23165447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4139 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Domingo, Enric Ramamoorthy, Rajarajan Oukrif, Dahmane Rosmarin, Daniel Presz, Michal Wang, Haitao Pulker, Hannah Lockstone, Helen Hveem, Tarjei Cranston, Treena Danielsen, Havard Novelli, Marco Davidson, Brian Xu, Zheng-Zhou Molloy, Peter Johnstone, Elaine Holmes, Christopher Midgley, Rachel Kerr, David Sieber, Oliver Tomlinson, Ian Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer |
title | Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer |
title_full | Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer |
title_short | Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer |
title_sort | use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domingoenric useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT ramamoorthyrajarajan useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT oukrifdahmane useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT rosmarindaniel useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT preszmichal useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT wanghaitao useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT pulkerhannah useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT lockstonehelen useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT hveemtarjei useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT cranstontreena useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT danielsenhavard useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT novellimarco useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT davidsonbrian useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT xuzhengzhou useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT molloypeter useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT johnstoneelaine useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT holmeschristopher useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT midgleyrachel useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT kerrdavid useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT sieberoliver useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer AT tomlinsonian useofmultivariateanalysistosuggestanewmolecularclassificationofcolorectalcancer |