Cargando…

Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training

The main goal of this research project was to retest the validity of a specifically designed judo field test (Santos Test) in a different group of judokas. Eight (n=8) national-level male judokas underwent laboratory and field testing. The mean data (mean +/− SD) obtained in the laboratory tests was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Luis, González, Vicente, Iscar, Marta, Brime, Juan I., Fernández-Río, Javier, Rodríguez, Blanca, Montoliu, Mª Ángeles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Versita, Warsaw 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23486994
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0048-3
_version_ 1782261599638126592
author Santos, Luis
González, Vicente
Iscar, Marta
Brime, Juan I.
Fernández-Río, Javier
Rodríguez, Blanca
Montoliu, Mª Ángeles
author_facet Santos, Luis
González, Vicente
Iscar, Marta
Brime, Juan I.
Fernández-Río, Javier
Rodríguez, Blanca
Montoliu, Mª Ángeles
author_sort Santos, Luis
collection PubMed
description The main goal of this research project was to retest the validity of a specifically designed judo field test (Santos Test) in a different group of judokas. Eight (n=8) national-level male judokas underwent laboratory and field testing. The mean data (mean +/− SD) obtained in the laboratory tests was: HR(max): 200 ± 4.0 beats × min(−1), VO(2 max): 52.8 ± 7.9 ± ml × kg(−1) × min(−1), lactate max: 12 ± 2.5 mmol × l(−1), HR at the anaerobic threshold: 174.2 ± 9.4 beats × min(−1), percentage of maximum heart rate at which the anaerobic threshold appears: 87 ± 3.6 %, lactate threshold: 4.0 ± 0.2 mmol × l(−1), and RPE: 17.2 ± 1.0. The mean data obtained in the field test (Santos) was: HR(max): 201.3 ± 4.1 beats × min(−1), VO(2 max): 55.6 ± 5.8 ml × kg(−1) × min(−1), lactate max: 15.6 ± 2.8 mmol × l(−1), HR at the anaerobic threshold: 173.2 ± 4.3 beats × min(−1), percentage of maximum heart rate at which the anaerobic threshold appears: 86 ± 2.5 %, lactate threshold: 4.0 ± 0.2 mmol × l(−1), and RPE: 16.7 ± 1.0. There were no significant differences between the data obtained on both tests in any of the parameters, except for maximum lactate concentration. Therefore, the Santos test can be considered a valid tool specific for judo training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3588626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Versita, Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35886262013-03-13 Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training Santos, Luis González, Vicente Iscar, Marta Brime, Juan I. Fernández-Río, Javier Rodríguez, Blanca Montoliu, Mª Ángeles J Hum Kinet Research Article The main goal of this research project was to retest the validity of a specifically designed judo field test (Santos Test) in a different group of judokas. Eight (n=8) national-level male judokas underwent laboratory and field testing. The mean data (mean +/− SD) obtained in the laboratory tests was: HR(max): 200 ± 4.0 beats × min(−1), VO(2 max): 52.8 ± 7.9 ± ml × kg(−1) × min(−1), lactate max: 12 ± 2.5 mmol × l(−1), HR at the anaerobic threshold: 174.2 ± 9.4 beats × min(−1), percentage of maximum heart rate at which the anaerobic threshold appears: 87 ± 3.6 %, lactate threshold: 4.0 ± 0.2 mmol × l(−1), and RPE: 17.2 ± 1.0. The mean data obtained in the field test (Santos) was: HR(max): 201.3 ± 4.1 beats × min(−1), VO(2 max): 55.6 ± 5.8 ml × kg(−1) × min(−1), lactate max: 15.6 ± 2.8 mmol × l(−1), HR at the anaerobic threshold: 173.2 ± 4.3 beats × min(−1), percentage of maximum heart rate at which the anaerobic threshold appears: 86 ± 2.5 %, lactate threshold: 4.0 ± 0.2 mmol × l(−1), and RPE: 16.7 ± 1.0. There were no significant differences between the data obtained on both tests in any of the parameters, except for maximum lactate concentration. Therefore, the Santos test can be considered a valid tool specific for judo training. Versita, Warsaw 2011-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3588626/ /pubmed/23486994 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0048-3 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Santos, Luis
González, Vicente
Iscar, Marta
Brime, Juan I.
Fernández-Río, Javier
Rodríguez, Blanca
Montoliu, Mª Ángeles
Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training
title Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training
title_full Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training
title_fullStr Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training
title_full_unstemmed Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training
title_short Retesting The Validity Of A Specific Field Test For Judo Training
title_sort retesting the validity of a specific field test for judo training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23486994
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0048-3
work_keys_str_mv AT santosluis retestingthevalidityofaspecificfieldtestforjudotraining
AT gonzalezvicente retestingthevalidityofaspecificfieldtestforjudotraining
AT iscarmarta retestingthevalidityofaspecificfieldtestforjudotraining
AT brimejuani retestingthevalidityofaspecificfieldtestforjudotraining
AT fernandezriojavier retestingthevalidityofaspecificfieldtestforjudotraining
AT rodriguezblanca retestingthevalidityofaspecificfieldtestforjudotraining
AT montoliumaangeles retestingthevalidityofaspecificfieldtestforjudotraining