Cargando…

Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field

This study investigated gender, age group and locality differences in adolescent athletes’ self-determination motivation and goal orientations in track and field. It also examined the relationship between the self-determination theory and achievement goal theory. A total of 632 (349 boys, 283 girls)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin, Ngien-Siong, Khoo, Selina, Low, Wah-Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23486244
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0054-0
_version_ 1782261609958211584
author Chin, Ngien-Siong
Khoo, Selina
Low, Wah-Yun
author_facet Chin, Ngien-Siong
Khoo, Selina
Low, Wah-Yun
author_sort Chin, Ngien-Siong
collection PubMed
description This study investigated gender, age group and locality differences in adolescent athletes’ self-determination motivation and goal orientations in track and field. It also examined the relationship between the self-determination theory and achievement goal theory. A total of 632 (349 boys, 283 girls) adolescent athletes (aged 13–18 years) completed the Sports Motivation Scale and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire. Results indicated significant differences between gender on intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation (t(630) = 4.10, p < 0.05) and ego orientation (t(630) = 2.48, p < 0.05). Male students reported higher intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation and ego orientation. A significant difference was found between age groups on task orientation (t(630) = 1.94, p < 0.05) and locality on ego orientation (t(630) = 1.94, p < 0.05). Older athletes showed significantly higher task orientation. Rural athletes had higher ego orientation whereas urban athletes have higher intrinsic motivation. Task orientation was related to intrinsic motivation (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), extrinsic motivation (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), but weakly related to amotivation (r = 0.10, p < 0.01). Ego orientation was related to intrinsic motivation (r = 0.30, p < 0.01), extrinsic motivation (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) and amotivaion (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). Task orientation was related to ego orientation (r = 0.29, p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis showed intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation accounted for 30.5% of the variances in task orientation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3588670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35886702013-03-13 Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field Chin, Ngien-Siong Khoo, Selina Low, Wah-Yun J Hum Kinet Research Article This study investigated gender, age group and locality differences in adolescent athletes’ self-determination motivation and goal orientations in track and field. It also examined the relationship between the self-determination theory and achievement goal theory. A total of 632 (349 boys, 283 girls) adolescent athletes (aged 13–18 years) completed the Sports Motivation Scale and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire. Results indicated significant differences between gender on intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation (t(630) = 4.10, p < 0.05) and ego orientation (t(630) = 2.48, p < 0.05). Male students reported higher intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation and ego orientation. A significant difference was found between age groups on task orientation (t(630) = 1.94, p < 0.05) and locality on ego orientation (t(630) = 1.94, p < 0.05). Older athletes showed significantly higher task orientation. Rural athletes had higher ego orientation whereas urban athletes have higher intrinsic motivation. Task orientation was related to intrinsic motivation (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), extrinsic motivation (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), but weakly related to amotivation (r = 0.10, p < 0.01). Ego orientation was related to intrinsic motivation (r = 0.30, p < 0.01), extrinsic motivation (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) and amotivaion (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). Task orientation was related to ego orientation (r = 0.29, p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis showed intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation accounted for 30.5% of the variances in task orientation. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2012-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3588670/ /pubmed/23486244 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0054-0 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Chin, Ngien-Siong
Khoo, Selina
Low, Wah-Yun
Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field
title Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field
title_full Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field
title_fullStr Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field
title_full_unstemmed Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field
title_short Self-Determination and Goal Orientation in Track and Field
title_sort self-determination and goal orientation in track and field
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23486244
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0054-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chinngiensiong selfdeterminationandgoalorientationintrackandfield
AT khooselina selfdeterminationandgoalorientationintrackandfield
AT lowwahyun selfdeterminationandgoalorientationintrackandfield