Cargando…
Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM
The present study investigated the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method to assess the energy cost in resistance exercises (RE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the aerobic and anaerobic energy release during resistance exercises performed at 80% 1-RM in four exercises (half squat, bench pres...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Versita, Warsaw
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23487002 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0061-6 |
_version_ | 1782261654264741888 |
---|---|
author | Vianna, Jefferson M. Lima, Jorge P. Saavedra, Francisco J. Reis, Victor M. |
author_facet | Vianna, Jefferson M. Lima, Jorge P. Saavedra, Francisco J. Reis, Victor M. |
author_sort | Vianna, Jefferson M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study investigated the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method to assess the energy cost in resistance exercises (RE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the aerobic and anaerobic energy release during resistance exercises performed at 80% 1-RM in four exercises (half squat, bench press, triceps extension and lat pull down), as well as the accuracy of its estimation. The sample comprised 14 men (age = 26.6 ± 4.9 years; height = 177.7 ± 0.1 cm; body mass = 79.0 ± 11.1 kg; and estimated fat mass = 10.5 ± 4.6%). Test and re-test of 1-RM were applied to every exercise. Low-intensity bouts at 12, 16, 20, and 24% of 1-RM were conducted. Energy cost was then extrapolated to 80% 1-RM exhaustive bout and relative energy contribution were assessed. By utilizing the AOD method, the results of the present study suggest a great proportion of anaerobic metabolism during exercise at 80% 1-RM in the four RE that were analyzed: Bench press = 77,66±6,95%; Half squat = 87,44±6,45%; Triceps extension = 63,91±9,22%; Lat pull down = 71,99±13,73 %. The results of the present study suggest that AOD during resistance exercises presents a pattern that does not match the reports in the literature for other types of exercise. The accuracy of the total energy demand estimation at 80% 1-RM was acceptable in the Bench press, in the Triceps extension and in the Lat pull down, but no in the Half squat. More studies are warranted to investigate the validity of this method in resistance exercise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3588899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Versita, Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35888992013-03-13 Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM Vianna, Jefferson M. Lima, Jorge P. Saavedra, Francisco J. Reis, Victor M. J Hum Kinet Research Article The present study investigated the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method to assess the energy cost in resistance exercises (RE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the aerobic and anaerobic energy release during resistance exercises performed at 80% 1-RM in four exercises (half squat, bench press, triceps extension and lat pull down), as well as the accuracy of its estimation. The sample comprised 14 men (age = 26.6 ± 4.9 years; height = 177.7 ± 0.1 cm; body mass = 79.0 ± 11.1 kg; and estimated fat mass = 10.5 ± 4.6%). Test and re-test of 1-RM were applied to every exercise. Low-intensity bouts at 12, 16, 20, and 24% of 1-RM were conducted. Energy cost was then extrapolated to 80% 1-RM exhaustive bout and relative energy contribution were assessed. By utilizing the AOD method, the results of the present study suggest a great proportion of anaerobic metabolism during exercise at 80% 1-RM in the four RE that were analyzed: Bench press = 77,66±6,95%; Half squat = 87,44±6,45%; Triceps extension = 63,91±9,22%; Lat pull down = 71,99±13,73 %. The results of the present study suggest that AOD during resistance exercises presents a pattern that does not match the reports in the literature for other types of exercise. The accuracy of the total energy demand estimation at 80% 1-RM was acceptable in the Bench press, in the Triceps extension and in the Lat pull down, but no in the Half squat. More studies are warranted to investigate the validity of this method in resistance exercise. Versita, Warsaw 2011-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3588899/ /pubmed/23487002 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0061-6 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vianna, Jefferson M. Lima, Jorge P. Saavedra, Francisco J. Reis, Victor M. Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM |
title | Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM |
title_full | Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM |
title_fullStr | Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM |
title_full_unstemmed | Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM |
title_short | Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM |
title_sort | aerobic and anaerobic energy during resistance exercise at 80% 1rm |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23487002 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0061-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viannajeffersonm aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm AT limajorgep aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm AT saavedrafranciscoj aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm AT reisvictorm aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm |