Cargando…

Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM

The present study investigated the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method to assess the energy cost in resistance exercises (RE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the aerobic and anaerobic energy release during resistance exercises performed at 80% 1-RM in four exercises (half squat, bench pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vianna, Jefferson M., Lima, Jorge P., Saavedra, Francisco J., Reis, Victor M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Versita, Warsaw 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23487002
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0061-6
_version_ 1782261654264741888
author Vianna, Jefferson M.
Lima, Jorge P.
Saavedra, Francisco J.
Reis, Victor M.
author_facet Vianna, Jefferson M.
Lima, Jorge P.
Saavedra, Francisco J.
Reis, Victor M.
author_sort Vianna, Jefferson M.
collection PubMed
description The present study investigated the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method to assess the energy cost in resistance exercises (RE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the aerobic and anaerobic energy release during resistance exercises performed at 80% 1-RM in four exercises (half squat, bench press, triceps extension and lat pull down), as well as the accuracy of its estimation. The sample comprised 14 men (age = 26.6 ± 4.9 years; height = 177.7 ± 0.1 cm; body mass = 79.0 ± 11.1 kg; and estimated fat mass = 10.5 ± 4.6%). Test and re-test of 1-RM were applied to every exercise. Low-intensity bouts at 12, 16, 20, and 24% of 1-RM were conducted. Energy cost was then extrapolated to 80% 1-RM exhaustive bout and relative energy contribution were assessed. By utilizing the AOD method, the results of the present study suggest a great proportion of anaerobic metabolism during exercise at 80% 1-RM in the four RE that were analyzed: Bench press = 77,66±6,95%; Half squat = 87,44±6,45%; Triceps extension = 63,91±9,22%; Lat pull down = 71,99±13,73 %. The results of the present study suggest that AOD during resistance exercises presents a pattern that does not match the reports in the literature for other types of exercise. The accuracy of the total energy demand estimation at 80% 1-RM was acceptable in the Bench press, in the Triceps extension and in the Lat pull down, but no in the Half squat. More studies are warranted to investigate the validity of this method in resistance exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3588899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Versita, Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35888992013-03-13 Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM Vianna, Jefferson M. Lima, Jorge P. Saavedra, Francisco J. Reis, Victor M. J Hum Kinet Research Article The present study investigated the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method to assess the energy cost in resistance exercises (RE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the aerobic and anaerobic energy release during resistance exercises performed at 80% 1-RM in four exercises (half squat, bench press, triceps extension and lat pull down), as well as the accuracy of its estimation. The sample comprised 14 men (age = 26.6 ± 4.9 years; height = 177.7 ± 0.1 cm; body mass = 79.0 ± 11.1 kg; and estimated fat mass = 10.5 ± 4.6%). Test and re-test of 1-RM were applied to every exercise. Low-intensity bouts at 12, 16, 20, and 24% of 1-RM were conducted. Energy cost was then extrapolated to 80% 1-RM exhaustive bout and relative energy contribution were assessed. By utilizing the AOD method, the results of the present study suggest a great proportion of anaerobic metabolism during exercise at 80% 1-RM in the four RE that were analyzed: Bench press = 77,66±6,95%; Half squat = 87,44±6,45%; Triceps extension = 63,91±9,22%; Lat pull down = 71,99±13,73 %. The results of the present study suggest that AOD during resistance exercises presents a pattern that does not match the reports in the literature for other types of exercise. The accuracy of the total energy demand estimation at 80% 1-RM was acceptable in the Bench press, in the Triceps extension and in the Lat pull down, but no in the Half squat. More studies are warranted to investigate the validity of this method in resistance exercise. Versita, Warsaw 2011-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3588899/ /pubmed/23487002 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0061-6 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Vianna, Jefferson M.
Lima, Jorge P.
Saavedra, Francisco J.
Reis, Victor M.
Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM
title Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM
title_full Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM
title_fullStr Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM
title_full_unstemmed Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM
title_short Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM
title_sort aerobic and anaerobic energy during resistance exercise at 80% 1rm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23487002
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0061-6
work_keys_str_mv AT viannajeffersonm aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm
AT limajorgep aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm
AT saavedrafranciscoj aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm
AT reisvictorm aerobicandanaerobicenergyduringresistanceexerciseat801rm