Cargando…

End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments

BACKGROUND: Making treatment decisions in anticipation of possible future incapacity is an important part of patient participation in end-of-life decision-making. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of GP-patient end-of-life treatment discussions and patients’ appointment of surrogate d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Natalie, Pasman, H. Roeline, Vega Alonso, Tomás, Van den Block, Lieve, Miccinesi, Guido, Van Casteren, Viviane, Donker, Gé, Bertolissi, Stefano, Zurriaga, Oscar, Deliens, Luc, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje, EUROIMPACT, on behalf of
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23472122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057965
_version_ 1782261740272091136
author Evans, Natalie
Pasman, H. Roeline
Vega Alonso, Tomás
Van den Block, Lieve
Miccinesi, Guido
Van Casteren, Viviane
Donker, Gé
Bertolissi, Stefano
Zurriaga, Oscar
Deliens, Luc
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje
EUROIMPACT, on behalf of
author_facet Evans, Natalie
Pasman, H. Roeline
Vega Alonso, Tomás
Van den Block, Lieve
Miccinesi, Guido
Van Casteren, Viviane
Donker, Gé
Bertolissi, Stefano
Zurriaga, Oscar
Deliens, Luc
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje
EUROIMPACT, on behalf of
author_sort Evans, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Making treatment decisions in anticipation of possible future incapacity is an important part of patient participation in end-of-life decision-making. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of GP-patient end-of-life treatment discussions and patients’ appointment of surrogate decision-makers in Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands and examines associated factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted with representative GP networks in four countries. GPs recorded the health and care characteristics in the last three months of life of 4,396 patients who died non-suddenly. Prevalences were estimated and logistic regressions were used to examine between country differences and country-specific associated patient and care factors. RESULTS: GP-patient discussion of treatment preferences occurred for 10%, 7%, 25% and 47% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and of Dutch patients respectively. Furthermore, 6%, 5%, 16% and 29% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and Dutch patients had a surrogate decision-maker. Despite some country-specific differences, previous GP-patient discussion of primary diagnosis, more frequent GP contact, GP provision of palliative care, the importance of palliative care as a treatment aim and place of death were positively associated with preference discussions or surrogate appointments. A diagnosis of dementia was negatively associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed a higher prevalence of treatment preference discussions and surrogate appointments in the two northern compared to the two southern European countries. Factors associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments suggest that delaying diagnosis discussions impedes anticipatory planning, whereas early preference discussions, particularly for dementia patients, and the provision of palliative care encourage participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3589464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35894642013-03-07 End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments Evans, Natalie Pasman, H. Roeline Vega Alonso, Tomás Van den Block, Lieve Miccinesi, Guido Van Casteren, Viviane Donker, Gé Bertolissi, Stefano Zurriaga, Oscar Deliens, Luc Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje EUROIMPACT, on behalf of PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Making treatment decisions in anticipation of possible future incapacity is an important part of patient participation in end-of-life decision-making. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of GP-patient end-of-life treatment discussions and patients’ appointment of surrogate decision-makers in Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands and examines associated factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted with representative GP networks in four countries. GPs recorded the health and care characteristics in the last three months of life of 4,396 patients who died non-suddenly. Prevalences were estimated and logistic regressions were used to examine between country differences and country-specific associated patient and care factors. RESULTS: GP-patient discussion of treatment preferences occurred for 10%, 7%, 25% and 47% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and of Dutch patients respectively. Furthermore, 6%, 5%, 16% and 29% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and Dutch patients had a surrogate decision-maker. Despite some country-specific differences, previous GP-patient discussion of primary diagnosis, more frequent GP contact, GP provision of palliative care, the importance of palliative care as a treatment aim and place of death were positively associated with preference discussions or surrogate appointments. A diagnosis of dementia was negatively associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed a higher prevalence of treatment preference discussions and surrogate appointments in the two northern compared to the two southern European countries. Factors associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments suggest that delaying diagnosis discussions impedes anticipatory planning, whereas early preference discussions, particularly for dementia patients, and the provision of palliative care encourage participation. Public Library of Science 2013-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3589464/ /pubmed/23472122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057965 Text en © 2013 Evans et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Evans, Natalie
Pasman, H. Roeline
Vega Alonso, Tomás
Van den Block, Lieve
Miccinesi, Guido
Van Casteren, Viviane
Donker, Gé
Bertolissi, Stefano
Zurriaga, Oscar
Deliens, Luc
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje
EUROIMPACT, on behalf of
End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments
title End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments
title_full End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments
title_fullStr End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments
title_full_unstemmed End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments
title_short End-of-Life Decisions: A Cross-National Study of Treatment Preference Discussions and Surrogate Decision-Maker Appointments
title_sort end-of-life decisions: a cross-national study of treatment preference discussions and surrogate decision-maker appointments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23472122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057965
work_keys_str_mv AT evansnatalie endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT pasmanhroeline endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT vegaalonsotomas endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT vandenblocklieve endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT miccinesiguido endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT vancasterenviviane endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT donkerge endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT bertolissistefano endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT zurriagaoscar endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT deliensluc endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT onwuteakaphilipsenbregje endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments
AT euroimpactonbehalfof endoflifedecisionsacrossnationalstudyoftreatmentpreferencediscussionsandsurrogatedecisionmakerappointments