Cargando…

Analysis of Body Composition in Individuals With High Bone Mass Reveals a Marked Increase in Fat Mass in Women But Not Men

CONTEXT: High bone mass (HBM), detected in 0.2% of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, is characterized by raised body mass index, the basis for which is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate why body mass index is elevated in individuals with HBM, we characterized body composition and examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregson, Celia L., Paggiosi, Margaret A., Crabtree, Nicola, Steel, Sue A., McCloskey, Eugene, Duncan, Emma L., Fan, Bo, Shepherd, John A., Fraser, William D., Smith, George Davey, Tobias, Jon H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Endocrine Society 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23337721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3342
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: High bone mass (HBM), detected in 0.2% of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, is characterized by raised body mass index, the basis for which is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate why body mass index is elevated in individuals with HBM, we characterized body composition and examined whether differences could be explained by bone phenotypes, eg, bone mass and/or bone turnover. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a case-control study of 153 cases with unexplained HBM recruited from 4 UK centers by screening 219 088 DXA scans. A total of 138 first-degree relatives (of whom 51 had HBM) and 39 spouses were also recruited. Unaffected individuals served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured fat mass, by DXA, and bone turnover markers. RESULTS: Among women, fat mass was inversely related to age in controls (P = .01), but not in HBM cases (P = .96) in whom mean fat mass was 8.9 [95% CI 4.7, 13.0] kg higher compared with controls (fully adjusted mean difference, P < .001). Increased fat mass in male HBM cases was less marked (gender interaction P = .03). Compared with controls, lean mass was also increased in female HBM cases (by 3.3 [1.2, 5.4] kg; P < .002); however, lean mass increases were less marked than fat mass increases, resulting in 4.5% lower percentage lean mass in HBM cases (P < .001). Osteocalcin was also lower in female HBM cases compared with controls (by 2.8 [0.1, 5.5] μg/L; P = .04). Differences in fat mass were fully attenuated after hip bone mineral density (BMD) adjustment (P = .52) but unchanged after adjustment for bone turnover (P < .001), whereas the greater hip BMD in female HBM cases was minimally attenuated by fat mass adjustment (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: HBM is characterized by a marked increase in fat mass in females, statistically explained by their greater BMD, but not by markers of bone turnover.