Cargando…
A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
OBJECTIVE: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy(®) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. DATA SOURCES AND ST...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S41017 |
_version_ | 1782261808140124160 |
---|---|
author | Berry, Scott M Broglio, Kristine Bunker, Mark Jayewardene, Amara Olin, Bryan Rush, A John |
author_facet | Berry, Scott M Broglio, Kristine Bunker, Mark Jayewardene, Amara Olin, Bryan Rush, A John |
author_sort | Berry, Scott M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy(®) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Six outpatient, multicenter, clinical trials that have evaluated VNS + TAU or TAU in TRD, including two single-arm studies of VNS + TAU (n = 60 and n = 74), a randomized study of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 235), a randomized study of VNS + TAU comparing different VNS stimulation intensities (n = 331), a nonrandomized registry of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 636), and a single-arm study of TAU (n = 124) to provide longer-term, control data for comparison with VNS-treated patients. DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic review of individual patient-level data based on the intent-to-treat principle, including all patients who contributed more than one post-baseline visit. Response was based on the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale’s Improvement subscale (CGI-I), as these were the two clinician-rated measures common across all or most studies. Remission was based on the MADRS. RESULTS: Outcomes were compared from baseline up to 96 weeks of treatment with VNS + TAU (n = 1035) versus TAU (n = 425). The MADRS response rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 12%, 18%, 28%, and 32% versus 4%, 7%, 12%, and 14% for TAU. The MADRS remission rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 3%, 5%, 10%, and 14% versus 1%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, for TAU. Adjunctive VNS Therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of response (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12, 4.66) and remission (OR = 4.99, CI: 2.93, 7.76), compared with TAU. For patients who had responded to VNS + TAU at 24 weeks, sustained response was more likely at 48 weeks (OR = 1.98, CI: 1.34, 3.01) and at 96 weeks (OR = 3.42, CI: 1.78, 7.31). Similar results were observed for CGI-I response. CONCLUSION: For patients with chronic TRD, VNS + TAU has greater response and remission rates that are more likely to persist than TAU. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3590011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35900112013-03-12 A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression Berry, Scott M Broglio, Kristine Bunker, Mark Jayewardene, Amara Olin, Bryan Rush, A John Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy(®) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Six outpatient, multicenter, clinical trials that have evaluated VNS + TAU or TAU in TRD, including two single-arm studies of VNS + TAU (n = 60 and n = 74), a randomized study of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 235), a randomized study of VNS + TAU comparing different VNS stimulation intensities (n = 331), a nonrandomized registry of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 636), and a single-arm study of TAU (n = 124) to provide longer-term, control data for comparison with VNS-treated patients. DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic review of individual patient-level data based on the intent-to-treat principle, including all patients who contributed more than one post-baseline visit. Response was based on the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale’s Improvement subscale (CGI-I), as these were the two clinician-rated measures common across all or most studies. Remission was based on the MADRS. RESULTS: Outcomes were compared from baseline up to 96 weeks of treatment with VNS + TAU (n = 1035) versus TAU (n = 425). The MADRS response rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 12%, 18%, 28%, and 32% versus 4%, 7%, 12%, and 14% for TAU. The MADRS remission rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 3%, 5%, 10%, and 14% versus 1%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, for TAU. Adjunctive VNS Therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of response (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12, 4.66) and remission (OR = 4.99, CI: 2.93, 7.76), compared with TAU. For patients who had responded to VNS + TAU at 24 weeks, sustained response was more likely at 48 weeks (OR = 1.98, CI: 1.34, 3.01) and at 96 weeks (OR = 3.42, CI: 1.78, 7.31). Similar results were observed for CGI-I response. CONCLUSION: For patients with chronic TRD, VNS + TAU has greater response and remission rates that are more likely to persist than TAU. Dove Medical Press 2013-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3590011/ /pubmed/23482508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S41017 Text en © 2013 Berry et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Berry, Scott M Broglio, Kristine Bunker, Mark Jayewardene, Amara Olin, Bryan Rush, A John A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression |
title | A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression |
title_full | A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression |
title_fullStr | A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression |
title_full_unstemmed | A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression |
title_short | A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression |
title_sort | patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S41017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berryscottm apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT brogliokristine apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT bunkermark apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT jayewardeneamara apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT olinbryan apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT rushajohn apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT berryscottm patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT brogliokristine patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT bunkermark patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT jayewardeneamara patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT olinbryan patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression AT rushajohn patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression |