Cargando…

A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression

OBJECTIVE: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy(®) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. DATA SOURCES AND ST...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berry, Scott M, Broglio, Kristine, Bunker, Mark, Jayewardene, Amara, Olin, Bryan, Rush, A John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482508
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S41017
_version_ 1782261808140124160
author Berry, Scott M
Broglio, Kristine
Bunker, Mark
Jayewardene, Amara
Olin, Bryan
Rush, A John
author_facet Berry, Scott M
Broglio, Kristine
Bunker, Mark
Jayewardene, Amara
Olin, Bryan
Rush, A John
author_sort Berry, Scott M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy(®) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Six outpatient, multicenter, clinical trials that have evaluated VNS + TAU or TAU in TRD, including two single-arm studies of VNS + TAU (n = 60 and n = 74), a randomized study of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 235), a randomized study of VNS + TAU comparing different VNS stimulation intensities (n = 331), a nonrandomized registry of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 636), and a single-arm study of TAU (n = 124) to provide longer-term, control data for comparison with VNS-treated patients. DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic review of individual patient-level data based on the intent-to-treat principle, including all patients who contributed more than one post-baseline visit. Response was based on the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale’s Improvement subscale (CGI-I), as these were the two clinician-rated measures common across all or most studies. Remission was based on the MADRS. RESULTS: Outcomes were compared from baseline up to 96 weeks of treatment with VNS + TAU (n = 1035) versus TAU (n = 425). The MADRS response rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 12%, 18%, 28%, and 32% versus 4%, 7%, 12%, and 14% for TAU. The MADRS remission rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 3%, 5%, 10%, and 14% versus 1%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, for TAU. Adjunctive VNS Therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of response (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12, 4.66) and remission (OR = 4.99, CI: 2.93, 7.76), compared with TAU. For patients who had responded to VNS + TAU at 24 weeks, sustained response was more likely at 48 weeks (OR = 1.98, CI: 1.34, 3.01) and at 96 weeks (OR = 3.42, CI: 1.78, 7.31). Similar results were observed for CGI-I response. CONCLUSION: For patients with chronic TRD, VNS + TAU has greater response and remission rates that are more likely to persist than TAU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3590011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35900112013-03-12 A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression Berry, Scott M Broglio, Kristine Bunker, Mark Jayewardene, Amara Olin, Bryan Rush, A John Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy(®) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Six outpatient, multicenter, clinical trials that have evaluated VNS + TAU or TAU in TRD, including two single-arm studies of VNS + TAU (n = 60 and n = 74), a randomized study of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 235), a randomized study of VNS + TAU comparing different VNS stimulation intensities (n = 331), a nonrandomized registry of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 636), and a single-arm study of TAU (n = 124) to provide longer-term, control data for comparison with VNS-treated patients. DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic review of individual patient-level data based on the intent-to-treat principle, including all patients who contributed more than one post-baseline visit. Response was based on the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale’s Improvement subscale (CGI-I), as these were the two clinician-rated measures common across all or most studies. Remission was based on the MADRS. RESULTS: Outcomes were compared from baseline up to 96 weeks of treatment with VNS + TAU (n = 1035) versus TAU (n = 425). The MADRS response rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 12%, 18%, 28%, and 32% versus 4%, 7%, 12%, and 14% for TAU. The MADRS remission rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 3%, 5%, 10%, and 14% versus 1%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, for TAU. Adjunctive VNS Therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of response (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12, 4.66) and remission (OR = 4.99, CI: 2.93, 7.76), compared with TAU. For patients who had responded to VNS + TAU at 24 weeks, sustained response was more likely at 48 weeks (OR = 1.98, CI: 1.34, 3.01) and at 96 weeks (OR = 3.42, CI: 1.78, 7.31). Similar results were observed for CGI-I response. CONCLUSION: For patients with chronic TRD, VNS + TAU has greater response and remission rates that are more likely to persist than TAU. Dove Medical Press 2013-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3590011/ /pubmed/23482508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S41017 Text en © 2013 Berry et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Berry, Scott M
Broglio, Kristine
Bunker, Mark
Jayewardene, Amara
Olin, Bryan
Rush, A John
A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
title A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
title_full A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
title_fullStr A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
title_full_unstemmed A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
title_short A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
title_sort patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482508
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S41017
work_keys_str_mv AT berryscottm apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT brogliokristine apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT bunkermark apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT jayewardeneamara apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT olinbryan apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT rushajohn apatientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT berryscottm patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT brogliokristine patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT bunkermark patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT jayewardeneamara patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT olinbryan patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression
AT rushajohn patientlevelmetaanalysisofstudiesevaluatingvagusnervestimulationtherapyfortreatmentresistantdepression