Cargando…

Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is a technique for the assessment of hydration and nutritional status, used in the clinical practice. Specific BIVA is an analytical variant, recently proposed for the Italian elderly population, that adjusts bioelectrical values for body ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buffa, Roberto, Saragat, Bruno, Cabras, Stefano, Rinaldi, Andrea C., Marini, Elisabetta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058533
_version_ 1782261820214476800
author Buffa, Roberto
Saragat, Bruno
Cabras, Stefano
Rinaldi, Andrea C.
Marini, Elisabetta
author_facet Buffa, Roberto
Saragat, Bruno
Cabras, Stefano
Rinaldi, Andrea C.
Marini, Elisabetta
author_sort Buffa, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is a technique for the assessment of hydration and nutritional status, used in the clinical practice. Specific BIVA is an analytical variant, recently proposed for the Italian elderly population, that adjusts bioelectrical values for body geometry. OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the accuracy of specific BIVA in the adult U.S. population, compared to the ‘classic’ BIVA procedure, using DXA as the reference technique, in order to obtain an interpretative model of body composition. DESIGN: A cross-sectional sample of 1590 adult individuals (836 men and 754 women, 21–49 years old) derived from the NHANES 2003–2004 was considered. Classic and specific BIVA were applied. The sensitivity and specificity in recognizing individuals below the 5(th) and above the 95(th) percentiles of percent fat (FM(DXA)%) and extracellular/intracellular water (ECW/ICW) ratio were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Classic and specific BIVA results were compared by a probit multiple-regression. RESULTS: Specific BIVA was significantly more accurate than classic BIVA in evaluating FM(DXA)% (ROC areas: 0.84–0.92 and 0.49–0.61 respectively; p = 0.002). The evaluation of ECW/ICW was accurate (ROC areas between 0.83 and 0.96) and similarly performed by the two procedures (p = 0.829). The accuracy of specific BIVA was similar in the two sexes (p = 0.144) and in FM(DXA)% and ECW/ICW (p = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: Specific BIVA showed to be an accurate technique. The tolerance ellipses of specific BIVA can be used for evaluating FM% and ECW/ICW in the U.S. adult population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3590169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35901692013-03-12 Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population Buffa, Roberto Saragat, Bruno Cabras, Stefano Rinaldi, Andrea C. Marini, Elisabetta PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is a technique for the assessment of hydration and nutritional status, used in the clinical practice. Specific BIVA is an analytical variant, recently proposed for the Italian elderly population, that adjusts bioelectrical values for body geometry. OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the accuracy of specific BIVA in the adult U.S. population, compared to the ‘classic’ BIVA procedure, using DXA as the reference technique, in order to obtain an interpretative model of body composition. DESIGN: A cross-sectional sample of 1590 adult individuals (836 men and 754 women, 21–49 years old) derived from the NHANES 2003–2004 was considered. Classic and specific BIVA were applied. The sensitivity and specificity in recognizing individuals below the 5(th) and above the 95(th) percentiles of percent fat (FM(DXA)%) and extracellular/intracellular water (ECW/ICW) ratio were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Classic and specific BIVA results were compared by a probit multiple-regression. RESULTS: Specific BIVA was significantly more accurate than classic BIVA in evaluating FM(DXA)% (ROC areas: 0.84–0.92 and 0.49–0.61 respectively; p = 0.002). The evaluation of ECW/ICW was accurate (ROC areas between 0.83 and 0.96) and similarly performed by the two procedures (p = 0.829). The accuracy of specific BIVA was similar in the two sexes (p = 0.144) and in FM(DXA)% and ECW/ICW (p = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: Specific BIVA showed to be an accurate technique. The tolerance ellipses of specific BIVA can be used for evaluating FM% and ECW/ICW in the U.S. adult population. Public Library of Science 2013-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3590169/ /pubmed/23484033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058533 Text en © 2013 Buffa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Buffa, Roberto
Saragat, Bruno
Cabras, Stefano
Rinaldi, Andrea C.
Marini, Elisabetta
Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population
title Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population
title_full Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population
title_fullStr Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population
title_short Accuracy of Specific BIVA for the Assessment of Body Composition in the United States Population
title_sort accuracy of specific biva for the assessment of body composition in the united states population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058533
work_keys_str_mv AT buffaroberto accuracyofspecificbivafortheassessmentofbodycompositionintheunitedstatespopulation
AT saragatbruno accuracyofspecificbivafortheassessmentofbodycompositionintheunitedstatespopulation
AT cabrasstefano accuracyofspecificbivafortheassessmentofbodycompositionintheunitedstatespopulation
AT rinaldiandreac accuracyofspecificbivafortheassessmentofbodycompositionintheunitedstatespopulation
AT marinielisabetta accuracyofspecificbivafortheassessmentofbodycompositionintheunitedstatespopulation